Re: kernal-package in stable not including config in /boot

1997-08-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Unfortunately, providing the config file, and getting rid of the psdatabase* files, and also the symlink /Sytem.{map,old} are features of the unstable kernel-package. Firstly, I think that there is a dependency on dpkg-dev >= 1.4.0.9, which (if I remember correctly) is not in 1.3.1

Re: kernal-package in stable not including config in /boot

1997-08-12 Thread Scott K. Ellis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > I see that the Debian `way' of placing kernels is: > > /vmlinuz -> boot/vmlinuz-2.0.30 > /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.30 > /boot/psdatabase-2.0.30 > /boot/psdatabase -> /boot/psdatabase-2.0.30 > /boot/System.map-2.0.30 > >

Re: kernal-package in stable not including config in /boot

1997-08-12 Thread Peter S Galbraith
As a side question... I don't use this package to compile kernels, I do it by hand the old Slackware way. When I'm done compiling, I simply: cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/zImage /zImage-someName Somehow, a `map' file also gets created as /boot/map I then edit lilo.conf, adding an entry for

kernal-package in stable not including config in /boot

1997-08-12 Thread Donovan Baarda
G'day deb's Someone (Manoj?) mentioned that the new kernel-package creates kernel-image deb's that put the kernel config file in /boot. I just created a kernel-image using the kernel-package that comes in the stable distribution of debian 1.3.1, and it definitely didn't do this. Is this a feature