Olav wrote:
> The same solution is true for everyone who wants to keep with sarge
> when it becomes the stable release.
Yes, but only if you don't use apt-pinning (I think most sarge users do)
because the codenames can't be used in /etc/apt/preferences, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:04:16PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> <#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Olav Lavell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Op di 28-09-2004, om 11:45 schreef Clive Menzies:
> >
> >> On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
On (28/09/04 21:18), Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 21:01, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > I don't think there is any non-free stuff on them. Time to google to verify
> > that.
>
> Take a look at the Virtual Richard M. Stallman:
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/vrms
Incoming from Justin Guerin:
>
> Are you sure this isn't just an aptitude problem? Aptitude doesn't seem to
> like it when you change sources.list. Have you tried apt-get update first?
That is nuts. Not only that, it worked! Thank you very much.
> I find that when I add a new source, I ha
Incoming from Joost Witteveen:
> Clive Menzies wrote:
>
> >># this doesn't:
> >>deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security woody/updates main contrib
> >>non-free
> >
> >Ah! Well this does here:
> >deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main
>
> [snip]
> Anyway http://www.debian.org
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olav Lavell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Op di 28-09-2004, om 11:45 schreef Clive Menzies:
>
>> On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>> > How do I set it up to make sure I stay with woody and do not
>> >
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How do I set it up to make sure I stay with woody and do not automatically
> upgrad to the new stable?
In /etc/apt/sources.list, change everything that says stable to woody.
-BEGIN PGP S
Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 21:01, Clive Menzies wrote:
I don't think there is any non-free stuff on them. Time to google to verify
that.
Take a look at the Virtual Richard M. Stallman:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/vrms
Brilliant!
However,
# dpkg --purge unra
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:52:47AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> > On (28/09/04 10:02), s. keeling wrote:
> > > Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> > > > On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When th
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 21:01, Clive Menzies wrote:
> I don't think there is any non-free stuff on them. Time to google to verify
> that.
Take a look at the Virtual Richard M. Stallman:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/vrms
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Max Moritz Sievers
On (28/09/04 18:50), Joost Witteveen wrote:
> Clive Menzies wrote:
>
> >Ah! Well this does here:
> >deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main
>
> Reminds me of the time my box was rooted. Must have been 1997 or
> thereabouts, and I was constantly keeping my box uptodate with
> the lat
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:11:21 -0600
Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (0) root /root_ aptitude update
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree
> > Reading extended state information... Done
> > W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org
> > wood
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 10:52, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> > On (28/09/04 10:02), s. keeling wrote:
> > > Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> > > > On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When
> > > >
Clive Menzies wrote:
# this doesn't:
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security woody/updates main contrib non-free
Ah! Well this does here:
deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main
Reminds me of the time my box was rooted. Must have been 1997 or
thereabouts, and I was constantly
Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> On (28/09/04 10:02), s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> > > On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When the
> > > > big switchover comes, I want the woody machine to continue r
On (28/09/04 10:02), s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> > On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When the
> > > big switchover comes, I want the woody machine to continue running
> > > woody and not follow stabl
Incoming from Clive Menzies:
> On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When the
> > big switchover comes, I want the woody machine to continue running
> > woody and not follow stable to a big change to sarge. Oh -- I will
>
> In
Op di 28-09-2004, om 11:45 schreef Clive Menzies:
> On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How do I set it up to make sure I stay with woody and do not
> > automatically upgrad to the new stable?
> In your /etc/apt/sources.list change references from "stable" to
> "woody" and then y
On (28/09/04 05:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When the
> big switchover comes, I want the woody machine to continue running
> woody and not follow stable to a big change to sarge. Oh -- I will
> eventually change to sarge, but at a time
I have a machine running woody and another running sargs. When the
big switchover comes, I want the woody machine to continue running
woody and not follow stable to a big change to sarge. Oh -- I will
eventually change to sarge, but at a time of my choosing, and with
suitable parallel operation:
20 matches
Mail list logo
