Christian Britz wrote:
> On 2022-02-15 17:26 UTC+0100, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > It's probably a disagreement on screen dpi settings. Check your
> > native setting and then replicate it on your headless server's
> > KDE config?
>
> Wouldn't this mainly/exclusively affect the fonts?
> I set dpi in bot
On 2022-02-15 17:26 UTC+0100, Dan Ritter wrote:
> It's probably a disagreement on screen dpi settings. Check your
> native setting and then replicate it on your headless server's
> KDE config?
Wouldn't this mainly/exclusively affect the fonts?
I set dpi in both systemsettings5 tool explicitly to 9
in vertical size. It seems to depend on
> the used toolkit, I noticed it only for KDE/QT apps. Any idea?
It's probably a disagreement on screen dpi settings. Check your
native setting and then replicate it on your headless server's
KDE config?
-dsr-
noticed it only for KDE/QT apps. Any idea?
Both the desktop and the server are running Bullseye currently.
Regards,
Christian
--
http://www.cb-fraggle.de
Alvin Oga ha scritto:
>
> hi ya andrea
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Andrea Ballatore wrote:
[...]
>>
>>What's the difference? How can I fix the problem?
>
>
> google/yahoo for answers
> utf8 UTF-8
>
> localedef -f UTF-8 -i en_US en_US.utf8
> ( use the your locales )
I found the
hi ya andrea
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Andrea Ballatore wrote:
> > what is the environment variables defined as:
> >
> > set | egrep -i "LANG|LC_"
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you have a broken "internalization" environment
you should also have LC_ variables defined
> > locale -a -> should li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alvin Oga ha scritto:
> 1;2c
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, belbo wrote:
>
>
>>This is probably a unicode-related problem on KDE, but I didn't find any
>>solution. I've already googled the problem, with no results...
>
>
> what is the environment variab
1;2c
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, belbo wrote:
> This is probably a unicode-related problem on KDE, but I didn't find any
> solution. I've already googled the problem, with no results...
what is the environment variables defined as:
set | egrep -i "LANG|LC_"
locale -a -> should list y
Hi,
when I type a special character (àòèéçìù) in a Gnome/GTK1.2/GTK2 application, it
works fine, as on the mozilla-based application. On the contrary, on the KDE/QT
I've got 2 special characters instead of the right one, for instance:
è => Ú
ç => ç
and so on.
This is probabl
On Monday 10 December 2001 20:43, xbud wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been having problems getting kde* ,base,libs,network,etc.. to get
> passed the configure on my box because of the Qt libraries.. The problem is
> I compile and install the Qt libraries fine... I even went as far as
> compiling them on ano
Hi,
I have been having problems getting kde* ,base,libs,network,etc.. to get
passed the configure on my box because of the Qt libraries.. The problem is I
compile and install the Qt libraries fine... I even went as far as compiling
them on another box and just transfering all files over to the
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 08:27:30PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joost Kooij) writes:
>
> > Other people will say that I'm violently wrong
>
> Actually, I'd say you were on crack. What's a soldering iron going to
> teach you that a breadboard couldn't?
Well, that's funny? T
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:57:47PM -0500, Rich Puhek wrote:
| And ignore the abacus and the slide rule? For shame! we must remember to
| study our roots!
Of course!
| Remember "heck week" from one of the later Revenge of the Nerds movies?
No, I never saw any of those.
-D
D-Man wrote:
> That's a good idea, but we really ought to start with vacuum tubes,
> now shouldn't we <.5 wink>?
BOFH would suggest Leyden jars and kites... ;-)*1.0
And ignore the abacus and the slide rule? For shame! we must remember to
study our roots!
Remember "heck week" from one of the later Revenge of the Nerds movies?
--Rich
D-Man wrote:
>
>
> That's a good idea, but we really ought to start with vacuum tubes,
> now shouldn't we <.5 wink>?
>
> -D
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 08:27:30PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joost Kooij) writes:
|
| > Other people will say that I'm violently wrong
|
| Actually, I'd say you were on crack. What's a soldering iron going to
I'd say it was a very fun read! Thanks! Alan, you know he wasn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joost Kooij) writes:
> Other people will say that I'm violently wrong
Actually, I'd say you were on crack. What's a soldering iron going to
teach you that a breadboard couldn't? And how often will work at that
level help the average coder? It hasn't in either of the two sof
On Friday 29 June 2001 00:57, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> > what did you start with when learning C++?
> >
> > any suggestions are appreciated.
>
> No suggestions, but you get a free ticket to a gratuitous rant:
woohoo! ;)
> Start with a soldering iron
Joost Kooij wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> > what did you start with when learning C++?
>
> > any suggestions are appreciated.
>
> No suggestions, but you get a free ticket to a gratuitous rant:
>
> Start with a soldering iron and develop a practical feeling fo
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> what did you start with when learning C++?
> any suggestions are appreciated.
No suggestions, but you get a free ticket to a gratuitous rant:
Start with a soldering iron and develop a practical feeling for
electronics. The basics are v
On Tuesday 26 June 2001 05:06, Brendon wrote:
> This summer holiday I took on the task of learning C++ with (shamefully :)
> the help of C++ For Dummies.
>
> Having tried to learn C++ in the past I'm now reasonably familar with it's
> synax so i thought i'd also try learning QT/KDE programming at t
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:12:56PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
| On Tuesday 26 June 2001 19:14, D-Man wrote:
| > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
| > | Does anyone know of a good site where QT/KDE programming is explained?
| > | And what did you start with when learning C++?
| >
|
On Tuesday 26 June 2001 20:16, you wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Brendon wrote:
> > This summer holiday I took on the task of learning C++ with (shamefully
> > :) the help of C++ For Dummies.
> >
> > Having tried to learn C++ in the past I'm now reasonably familar with
> > it's synax so i thought i
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Brendon wrote:
> This summer holiday I took on the task of learning C++ with (shamefully :)
> the help of C++ For Dummies.
>
> Having tried to learn C++ in the past I'm now reasonably familar with it's
> synax so i thought i'd also try learning QT/KDE programming at the same t
On Tuesday 26 June 2001 19:14, D-Man wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
> | Does anyone know of a good site where QT/KDE programming is explained?
> | And what did you start with when learning C++?
>
> I don't use KDE and I don't like Qt's LnF so I don't know about th
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Brendon wrote:
| This summer holiday I took on the task of learning C++ with (shamefully :)
| the help of C++ For Dummies.
|
| Having tried to learn C++ in the past I'm now reasonably familar with it's
| synax so i thought i'd also try learning QT/KDE p
This summer holiday I took on the task of learning C++ with (shamefully :)
the help of C++ For Dummies.
Having tried to learn C++ in the past I'm now reasonably familar with it's
synax so i thought i'd also try learning QT/KDE programming at the same time.
But the tutorials I've been through o
I get the following error when I attempt to run kmedia in KDE:
libkfile.so.2:undefined symbol: __pure_virtual
According to the kde-user list archives, this is the fault of the Debian
package, which apparently does not support any version of Qt other than
that in the 1.42-1 .deb package.(I have 1
Date sent: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 05:11:27 -0400
From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE/Qt Status in Debian dists
> Just b
On Wed, 07 Apr 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> > install.
>
> Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
> source to install outside the p
J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> > install.
>
> Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
> source to install outside the package manager contro
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 00:45:31 +, Terry Hancock wrote:
> On the Hamm CDs, the "Qt" library required by KDE is not included for
> licensing reasons.
> However, the Troll Tech website claims the newer versions of Qt are "free"
> software,
Qt 2.0 will be licensed under the QPL 1.0, which is a
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> install.
Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
source to install outside the package manager controlled directories, e.g.
by --prefi
Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and install.
This way when you decide to upgrade you won't have to worry about qt-kde getting
broken unless some of their support libraries change. And even if that does
happen,
it would just mean that you would need to recompile
Hi,
I've installed the "Hamm" (=2.0) distribution of Debian Linux from CD,
and I intended from the
start to install KDE as quickly as I could, but Debian has since gone to
"Slink" (=2.1).
On the Hamm CDs, the "Qt" library required by KDE is not included for
licensing reasons.
However, the Troll Te
35 matches
Mail list logo
