On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 07:34:59PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
I am surprised of the disapperance of javaws, since many mangement
console use them... And I do not count on hardware (or SOC) vendors to
upgrade them to whatever the new scheme will be.
It's better in the long term to keep around a d
>> this...
> I hope it's not something based on Webstart? Because Webstart will no
> longer be part of Java 11. So I guess at least some of us will have to
> keep a copy of a JRE with javaws around for some time.
> That is also the reason why the Java 8 support in the current ja
omething based on Webstart? Because Webstart will no
>longer be part of Java 11. So I guess at least some of us will have to
>keep a copy of a JRE with javaws around for some time.
>That is also the reason why the Java 8 support in the current
>java-package
>shipped in Debian is kind of s
se Webstart will no
longer be part of Java 11. So I guess at least some of us will have to
keep a copy of a JRE with javaws around for some time.
That is also the reason why the Java 8 support in the current java-package
shipped in Debian is kind of sufficient. Java 9 and 10 are only short
term release
d on a case by case basis I guess.
> There will still be reference binary OpenJDK builds published on
> jdk.java.net but I'm not sure if it's worth to provide support for them
> in java-package.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Sven
Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN
storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for
this...
--
Erwan
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:30:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
> Incidentally, it has been a long time since I encountered any Java that
> would run on the Oracle JVM but not on OpenJDK. Are you sure you need
> to even bother with the Oracle JVM?
The main point so far was to aid debugg
. If it's the one shipped by your distro or 3rd parties like
Azul needs to be determined on a case by case basis I guess.
There will still be reference binary OpenJDK builds published on
jdk.java.net but I'm not sure if it's worth to provide support for them
in java-package.
Cheers,
Sven
o uses
> oracle JRE on debian ?
>
I don't know about java-package, as I have not used it many years.
However, you can download the .tar.gz and just unpack it (I would think
/opt is a good choice of target location). Or you can download the .rpm
and use alien to turn it into a .deb.
I
Hi,
This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java
9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the
packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses
oracle JRE on debian ?
--
Erwan
Hello,
I think you all are aware of the recent news for Oracle's java binaries
that will be removed from almost every linux distribution repositories¹
because of the new Oracle's policy for redistributing this packages
(sigh...).
So far so good but I can foresee there will be several users (me
>It's avaible in contrib in all Debian flavours. Remember that the
>command you've to call is make-jpkg.
Hmm. Perhaps that's the problem. Maybe I don't have contrib listed in my
repositories. I'll check that when I'm back to work on Monday.
Thanks,
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 10:32:21PM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> Hello. I tried to install java-package, so that, via fakeroot, I could
> install sun's java runtime environment. Java-package did not exist, however.
> Has something new happened that I'm not aware of?
It&#
Hello. I tried to install java-package, so that, via fakeroot, I could install
sun's java runtime environment. Java-package did not exist, however. Has
something new happened that I'm not aware of?
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
>
> I test on stable and testing.
>
> I do :
>
> fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
>
> I've this :
>
> """
> /ho
2006/10/13, KLEIN Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I test on stable and testing.
I do :
fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I've this :
"""
/home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 419: /etc/mailcap:
Permi
Hi,
I would like build debian package for jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I test on stable and testing.
I do :
fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin
I've this :
"""
/home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i586.bin: line 419: /etc/mailcap:
Permission denied
/home/stephane/jdk-1_5_0_09-linux-i5
Mark Grieveson wrote:
The Debian package has been created in the current directory. You can
install the package as root (e.g. dpkg -i
sun-j2sdk1.5_1.5.0+update08_i386.deb).
Removing temporary directory: done
So, after
The Debian package has been created in the current directory. You can
install the package as root (e.g. dpkg -i
sun-j2sdk1.5_1.5.0+update08_i386.deb).
Removing temporary directory: done
So, after the last step, if my de
To install the Java from Sun, I was following the steps given here:
http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/debianjava.htm
When I do the fakeroot command to make the deb package out of the java
bin file I had previously downloaded, I get this kind of output:
---
* Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What's the name of a Java package for Mozilla?
Check j2se-package on http://z42.de/debian/
--
Kai Weber
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.glorybox.de gpg-key: 0x594D4132
icq: 102024972
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Em Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:40:06 +0200, Otto Wyss escreveu:
> What's the name of a Java package for Mozilla?
Depends on what you want. Runtime, SDK?
Check http://apt-get.org./ and http://blackdown.org./
--
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (44) 3028 7467 e
What's the name of a Java package for Mozilla?
O. Wyss
--
How to enhance your code, see "http://freshmeat.net/projects/wxguide/";
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I installed java-package from unstable and downloaded the sun sdk1.4.
Using make-jpkg I created a .deb file which I then installed. How do I
now get my system to see this version of java? No links were created in
/etc/alternatives. On a different system in the past I used a tool from
http://z42.de
--- Christian Schoenebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi!
>
> I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails:
>
> Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ...
> update-alternatives: unable to make
> /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.so.dpk
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:24:17PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails:
>
> Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ...
> update-alternatives: unable to make
> /usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.s
Hi!
I tried to install the Blackdown Java packages, but setting up j2re1.4 fails:
Setting up j2re1.4 (1.4.0.99beta-1) ...
update-alternatives: unable to make
/usr/lib/mozilla-cvs/plugins/javaplugin_oji.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to
/etc/alternatives/javaplugin_oji-mozil
I've installed the following packages:
jdk-apidocs 1.0.2-1Java 1.0.2 API.
jdk-common 1.0.2-3JDK (Java Development Kit)
jdk-static 1.0.2-3JDK (Java Development Kit) - Static part
I keep getting an error like:
java was not found in /usr/lib/jdk/i486/bin/java
an
27 matches
Mail list logo
