Russell L. Carter wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Russell L. Carter wrote:
> >> Ok, I need to do some experimenting here. I've broken out a long patch
> >> cable to bypass the switch
> >
> > I would really be surprised if the switch has broken down. Not impossible
> > of course. But what are the
On 12/05/2013 06:04 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Russell L. Carter wrote:
>> Ok, I need to do some experimenting here. I've broken out a long patch
>> cable to bypass the switch
>
> I would really be surprised if the switch has broken down. Not impossible
> of course. But what are the odds? I thi
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> Ok, I need to do some experimenting here. I've broken out a long
> patch cable to bypass the switch
I would really be surprised if the switch has broken down. Not
impossible of course. But what are the odds? I think it very
unlikely. If I were to guess I would guess
Greetings Bob,
On 12/05/2013 04:27 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Russell L. Carter wrote:
>> I've got an internal net with several dual-homed jessie boxen.
>
> I see that you have 10.0.10.0/24 on one and 10.0.11.0/24 on the other. Is
> that correct? And you only want dhcpd to serve DHCP requests on t
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> I've got an internal net with several dual-homed jessie boxen.
I see that you have 10.0.10.0/24 on one and 10.0.11.0/24 on the
other. Is that correct? And you only want dhcpd to serve DHCP
requests on the 10.0.10.0/24 network?
> I would like to get isc-dhcp-server up
Hi,
After wearing out the google I'm going to foist my problem onto you
good folk.
I've got an internal net with several dual-homed jessie boxen. I
would like to get isc-dhcp-server up so I can configure my new UniFi
toy. The server has two statically configured interfaces, eth0 and
eth1.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
