On Monday 02 December 2019 04:35:26 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 01 dec 19, 22:28:43, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > It, iptables, did not get restarted on the fresh boot, so obviously
> > the systemd manager hasn't been informed to start iptables,
> > reloading from /etc/iptables/saved-rules.
>
> To
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Gururajan Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think iptables may be blocking SMTP. I cannot figure
> out how. Could you tell me if I am correct and how I
> can fix it?
>
> Two NICs: eth0 is the LAN and eth1 is the WAN
When asking for he
Hello,
I think iptables may be blocking SMTP. I cannot figure
out how. Could you tell me if I am correct and how I
can fix it?
Two NICs: eth0 is the LAN and eth1 is the WAN
Here are my iptables-save and iptables -L -n outputs:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.2.9 on Sun Sep 5
12:43:05 2004
*na
Title: RE: Iptables help ..
From: David Bokan
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 1:56 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Iptables help ..
I think that you'd have to use the FORWARD chain instead of INPUT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -I eth0 -s 0/0 -d ! 10.0.0.0/8 --dpor
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 10:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the following iptables rules for the NAT, but i also want to
> block outgoing port 25 traffic from the LAN clients. INAT works fine but
> the outgoing port 25 is still open
>
> /sbin/iptables -F -t nat
> /sbin/iptables -
Hi,
I am using the following iptables rules for the NAT, but i also want to
block outgoing port 25 traffic from the LAN clients. INAT works fine but
the outgoing port 25 is still open
/sbin/iptables -F -t nat
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -s 0/0 -d ! 10.0.0.0/8
--dport 25
-j REJECT
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:38:39AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:34:39PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > It would be very useful to have some script that would ask you what
> > services you intended to run, and generated scripts for iptables etc.
> > that ensured that only the mi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:34:39PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> It would be very useful to have some script that would ask you what
> services you intended to run, and generated scripts for iptables etc.
> that ensured that only the minimum necessary services were available.
Don't we have this kind of t
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0500, jereme wrote:
> Let me reidirate, this is a _very_bad_ way to conscruct a firewall. A
> better arpproach would be to tell us what services you do want to
> provide, and to whom, the number of interfaces and their connections,
> etc.
>
> Then you set the d
* GBV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030213 10:08]:
> I have an webserver on port 3321
> how I can use iptables to deny(drop) all packages coming from internet??
iptables -P INPUT DROP
will drop all incoming packets period.
>
> my inet interface is eth0
iptables -A INPUT -j DROP -i eth0
will drop all p
"GBV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an webserver on port 3321
>
> how I can use iptables to deny(drop) all packages coming from internet??
[...]
> Deny any request coming from eth0, destinated to this host on port
> 3321
I had a bit of trouble interpretting what you really wanted answer
I have an webserver on port 3321
how I can use iptables to deny(drop) all packages
coming from internet??
my inet interface is eth0
something like
Deny any request coming from eth0, destinated to
this host on port 3321
thks..
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:30:26 -0400
From: Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [[IPTABLES HELP (fwd)]]
OK, 1 more time. If you don't get this, go to the archives.
- Forwarded message from Wayne Topa <[E
Subject: IPTABLES HELP
Date: Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:05:33AM -0400
In reply to:dude
Quoting dude([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> If this is the wrong list, please tell
> me where i should post this.
>
debian-firewall
--
Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue...
___
If this is the wrong list, please tell
me where i should post this.
Here is my iptables setup.
As you can see I want a very secure firewall (and gateway)
but i do want to have the ability to ssh from the outside
and i am still not sure how to go about it.
Anyway, here is my setup and
i would a
a billion thanks
you sure you dont want that kid?
hehe
thanks again
ill try that
adios
tom
Quoting \"Jonathan D. Proulx\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:04:30PM +1000, Tom Tsaknakis wrote:
> :i will give anyone my first born if you can help me with converting this
> :\\\'/sbin/
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:04:30PM +1000, Tom Tsaknakis wrote:
:i will give anyone my first born if you can help me with converting this
:\'/sbin/ipchains -A input -s 10.96.8.1 -p IGMP -j ACCEPT\'
I have all the kids I need :)
But I have this working:
iptables -A INPUT --proto icmp -s 10.9.1.1/32
i will give anyone my first born if you can help me with converting this
\'/sbin/ipchains -A input -s 10.96.8.1 -p IGMP -j ACCEPT\'
to an iptables line
thanx in advance
Tom
-
This mail sent through IMP on IGN WebMail.
http://webmail.ign.com.au
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> I am confused...
Sorry about my noise. I found it was due to two reasons:
1. IN/OUT rules are used unless the packet is delivered to the local
computer (ie not used if the packet is being forwarded). This seems
to be a difference
Hello,
I thought that these iptables rules:
snoopy:~# iptables -v -L ppp0-out
Chain ppp0-out (1 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 LOGall -- anyany 192.168.0.0/16 anywhere
LOG level w
20 matches
Mail list logo