Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

On 2024-12-16, Poon Weng Chee wrote: > > Dear Debian, > > We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is u= > sed to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious I= > P address on http://brightcloud.com/support/lookup.php. >

Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 5:12 PM Poon Weng Chee wrote: > > Dear Debian, > > We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is > used to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP > address on http://brightcloud.com/

Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 20:12 +, Andy Smith wrote: > deb.debian.org is hosted by the Fastly CDN as are literally millions of > other sites, because that is the point of a CDN. Furthermore, it is not a single IP address, but there is some geolocation going on, so deb.debian.org resol

Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

On 17/12/24 03:29, George at Clug wrote: On Tuesday, 17-12-2024 at 06:08 Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote: On Monday 16 December 2024 08:09:08 am Poon Weng Chee wrote: Dear Debian, We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is used to access the Debian repositories

Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

Hi Poon, [Note that you have emailed a large number of Debian addresses, most of which are read by volunteers who do not speak for Debian. I'm one of those.] On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 01:09:08PM +, Poon Weng Chee wrote: > We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.or

Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

On Tuesday, 17-12-2024 at 06:08 Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote: > On Monday 16 December 2024 08:09:08 am Poon Weng Chee wrote: > > Dear Debian, > > > > We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is > > used to access the Debian repositorie

Re: Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

On Monday 16 December 2024 08:09:08 am Poon Weng Chee wrote: > Dear Debian, > > We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is > used to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP > address on http://brightcloud.com/sup

Debian Repositories "deb.debian.org" Listed as a Threat or Malicious IP.

Dear Debian, We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is used to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP address on http://brightcloud.com/support/lookup.php. Despite attempting to submit this IP address for removal from the threat

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 10:50:26AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > It isn't Debian. It's that netblock. Try 191.97.36.54. I suspect that works because you are asking a LACNIC whois server for an IP in its own database, so it's not having to contact RIPE's whois, where th

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 11:34:52AM -0500, vi...@wlcr.net wrote: > On 2024/11/27 01:57 AM, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > I get a similar but slightly different error message. > > > > tmb@hp-debian:~$ whois 191.96.36.56 > > % IP Client: 2607:fb90:d

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 12:38:23PM -0500, vi...@wlcr.net wrote: > No idea how to troubleshoot that one. What specifically do you want to troubleshoot? My question would be: whois in Debian 11 seems to consistently receive the blocked query error showing a LACNIC IP while whois

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

It isn't Debian. It's that netblock. Try 191.97.36.54. Also try whois -r 191.96.36.54 -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

On 2024/12/02 12:02 PM, Andy Smith wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 11:34:52AM -0500, vi...@wlcr.net wrote: On 2024/11/27 01:57 AM, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: I get a similar but slightly different error message. tmb@hp-debian:~$ whois 191.96.36.56 % IP Client: 2607:fb90

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

: Can anyone explain why whois on a Debian server gets a rejection as if through a proxy server? Does the Debian command "whois" not connect directly to the various databases: $whois 191.96.36.56 % IP Client: 64.25x.xx.xx

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

vi...@wlcr.net writes: > here's a new one of the same problem: > $ whois 191.96.36.52 It's anything in 191.96. 190.112.52.14 seems to belong to LACNIC. Seems unlikely but it looks like RIPE is blocking them. I don't know why the query goes first to LACNIC and then to RIPE. I don't think it's

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

On Sat 30 Nov 2024 at 21:20:15 (+), Andy Smith wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 04:03:05PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > >> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 3:05 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > >> > > To make it permanent, either add a line to /etc/sysctl.conf or add a > > >> > > new file in /et

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

Hi, On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 04:03:05PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > >> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 3:05 PM Greg Wooledge > >> wrote: > >> > > To make it permanent, either add a line to /etc/sysctl.conf or add a > >> > > new file in /etc/sysctl.d/ (check the README.sysctl file in there). >

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

t 3:05 PM Greg Wooledge >> wrote: >> > >> > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 14:55:01 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: >> > > > I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It used >> to be >> > > > setup in /etc/sysctl

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

t; > > I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It used > to be > > > > setup in /etc/sysctl but that file is no longer present. > > > > > > > > I used the sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 command and it seems > to > > &g

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 15:12:01 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 3:05 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 14:55:01 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > > I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 3:05 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 14:55:01 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It used to be > > setup in /etc/sysctl but that file is no longer present. > > >

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

Hi, On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 02:55:01PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It used to be > setup in /etc/sysctl but that file is no longer present. > > I used the sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 command and it se

Re: Persistent IP Forwarding

On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 14:55:01 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It used to be > setup in /etc/sysctl but that file is no longer present. > > I used the sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 command and it seems to

Persistent IP Forwarding

Hello, I'm trying to configure persistent IP Forwarding on Trixie. It used to be setup in /etc/sysctl but that file is no longer present. I used the sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 command and it seems to work but where is the setting stored at? Thanks -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 4:27 AM George at Clug wrote: > > Curiosity got the better of me, so I installed "whois" and gave it a try. > > Below are the responses I get, for "$whois 191.96.36.56" and I tried a whois > on the ip in "%ERROR:201: access denied f

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Curiosity got the better of me, so I installed "whois" and gave it a try. Below are the responses I get, for "$whois 191.96.36.56"  and I tried a whois on the ip in "%ERROR:201: access denied for 190.112.52.14" I wonder what this information might mean to anyone?

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

t; >> Does the Debian command "whois" not connect directly to the various >> databases? >> >> >> $whois 191.96.36.56 >> % IP Client: 64.25x.xx.xx >> % This is the RIPE Database query service. >> % The objects are in RPSL format. >>

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 4:02 PM vi...@wlcr.net wrote: > Can anyone explain why whois on a Debian server gets a rejection as if > through a proxy server? > > Does the Debian command "whois" not connect directly to the various > databases? > > > $whois 191.96

Re: WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

On Tuesday, 26 November 2024 17:52:51 -03 vi...@wlcr.net wrote: > Can anyone explain why whois on a Debian server gets a rejection as if > through a proxy server? > > Does the Debian command "whois" not connect directly to the various > databases? > > >

WHOIS rejection from strange IP address

Can anyone explain why whois on a Debian server gets a rejection as if through a proxy server? Does the Debian command "whois" not connect directly to the various databases? $whois 191.96.36.56 % IP Client: 64.25x.xx.xx  % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects a

Re: IP Masquerade failing

On Thu 31 Oct 2024 at 10:06:42 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:48:52AM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote: > > Timothy M Butterworth writes: > > > > > As you can see here pinging google from eth0 fails. If masquerading was > > > working then ping would be successful. > > I'm

Re: IP Masquerade failing

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:48:52AM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote: > Timothy M Butterworth writes: > > > As you can see here pinging google from eth0 fails. If masquerading was > > working then ping would be successful. I'm late to the party, but did you take into account that masquerading ICMP (ping

Re: IP Masquerade failing

Timothy M Butterworth writes: > As you can see here pinging google from eth0 fails. If masquerading was > working then ping would be successful. Well, if it helps, I don't have external accress on my router via the inside interface either. Works from the LAN hosts though

Re: IP Masquerade failing

:11:f1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Note " cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 Why do you need to do it manually? I would think that the front-end that you use would do that. sudo firewall-cmd --zone=drop --query-masquerade yes ip addr 4: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group de

IP Masquerade failing

hello, I am trying to get ip masquerading working with no luck. Interface wlo1 is in the drop zone and is the internet facing network interface. Interface eth0 is in the public zone and is the internal facing interface. ip link 2: wlo1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DORMANT group default

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

Hello, On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:49:32PM +0200, Detlef Vollmann wrote: > The only thing that's always annoying is that too many programs > believe they have to overwrite /etc/resolv.conf... chattr +i # immutable still works :)

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 2024-07-06, George at Clug wrote: >> What I really need is a good book >> or document that explains the design >> and implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on >> modern Debian GNU/Linux systems.  Recommendations? > > Sadly I have not found any documentation (or books) f

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

ed to "eno1", or a PCI ethernet interface may be renamed to something like "enp2s0" based on the PCI slot. Or, if you don't want the kernel to assign names, you may choose your own names for your interfaces, by configuring systemd.link(5) files. To learn what your in

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/6/24 06:51, David Christensen wrote: The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console network administration skills have been rendered obsolete by systemd and NetworkManager. I don't think that these skills are obsolete. I still use /etc/network/interfaces for everythi

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/6/24 06:37, jeremy ardley wrote: As I said in my earlier post, it's not necessary to disable dhcpd and in fact it is likely undesirable. Note that the warning in the wiki talks about dhcpcd, not about dhcpd. Though as a pointed out before, your machine very likely will have NetworkManag

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

an attempt to configure static has IP failed. The assumption is that a reader is either aware what network management tools are installed on their machine or is able to review installed packages, active services, running processes. DHCP client activity may appear in logs. I think this warni

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

work-bridge_configuring-and-managing-networking#configuring-a-network-bridge-using-nmcli-commands_configuring-a-network-bridge https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/linux-on-systems?topic=choices-kvm-default-nat-based-networking https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Libvirtd_and_dnsmasq https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Network

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

, this tutorial to configure it nmtui is good. NetworkManager supports static IP addresses and you can configure them in nmtui. https://www.tecmint.com/nmtui-configure-network-connection/ Remember if you use NetworkManager you have to remove your static entries in /etc/network/interfaces

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/5/24 19:06, Max Nikulin wrote: On 7/5/24 21:14, George at Clug wrote: Thank you for your replies. The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console network administration skills have been rendered obsolete by systemd and NetworkManager. I typically install Xfce whe

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 6/7/24 09:16, David Christensen wrote: I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding disabling DHCP when using a static IP: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/sect.network-config.en.html#sect.interface-ethernet As I said in my earlier

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

David, How are your efforts toward setting a static IP address going? Have you succeeded. I set up a lot of test servers (for fun and no profit), and hence work with Hypervisors (KVM more than Virtual Box), and have some experience in this area. But at this point I am not sure if you need

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 06/07/2024 08:16, David Christensen wrote: I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding disabling DHCP when using a static IP: [...] https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration?action=info The following sentence: "Make sure to disable all DHCP ser

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 7/4/24 21:08, Felix Miata wrote: On 7/4/24 21:10, jeremy ardley wrote: On 7/5/24 11:44, Franco Martelli wrote: Thank you all for the replies. I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding disabling DHCP when using a static IP: https://www.debian.or

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

method to "disable all DHCP services"? You can also keep your virtual machine configured to request an IP address from your DHCP server and configure the server to send the IP address that you wish. All you need to know it's the NIC's MAC address of your virtual machine,

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

r "manages" /etc/resolv.conf, and create a regular file of your own design. I don't use VMs, but I did several hours ago instruct several hours ago using systemd-network to setup static IP service for a *buntu user who couldn't get netplan sorted: There seems to be some

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

and create a regular file of your own design. I don't use VMs, but I did several hours ago instruct several hours ago using systemd-network to setup static IP service for a *buntu user who couldn't get netplan sorted: There seems to be some misunderstanding here. dhcpd services for

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

On 5/7/24 10:06, David Christensen wrote: The Debian wiki also says: "Make sure to disable all DHCP services, e.g. dhcpcd." What is the correct method to "disable all DHCP services"? The instruction is not necessary. It doesn't matter if there is a dhcp server anywhere if the client -

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

ist-unit-files output, and if it's not just a symlink to something in the /run/ tree. /etc/resolv.d/ might be another place to look. I've been using systemd-network so long I don't remember the hodgepodge of old ways to "manage" this file that normally needs no management wit

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

r "manages" /etc/resolv.conf, How do I determine what manages /etc/resolv.conf? and create a regular file of your own design. I don't use VMs, but I did several hours ago instruct several hours ago using systemd-network to setup static IP service for a *buntu user who could

Re: Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

owns the unit(s): systemctl list-unit-files | egrep 'net|dhcp' Do the same with whatever "manages" /etc/resolv.conf, and create a regular file of your own design. I don't use VMs, but I did several hours ago instruct several hours ago using systemd-network to s

Debian 11 and IPv4 static IP address

debian-user: I have built a VirtualBox virtual machine and installed Debian 11 with SSH server and standard system utilities only. I plan to use the VM to run the UniFi Network Controller to manage the UniFi equipment on my SOHO LAN: root@unifi:~# cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a 11.10 Li

Re: IPv6, ip token, NetworkManager and accept_ra

On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, Ralph Aichinger wrote: Hi fellow Debian users! In my quest to advance the IPv6 preparedness of my home LAN I want to find a solution to use IP tokens on all my clients. IP tokens (keeping the host part of the IPv6 address static while getting the subnet part by SLAAC) seem

Re: IPv6, ip token, NetworkManager and accept_ra

On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 15:31 +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > It should be if you enter "save" in the nmcli. Thanks, I did not realize this was possible. I probably will use nmcli more often in the future. Ralph

Re: IPv6, ip token, NetworkManager and accept_ra

Am 02.02.2024 schrieb Ralph Aichinger : > On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 14:28 +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > > # nmcli c mod enp4s0 ipv6.addr-gen-mode eui64 > > # nmcli c mod enp4s0 ipv6.token ::deca:fbad:c0:ffee > > This is not permanent, is it? It should be if you enter "save" in the nmcli.

Re: IPv6, ip token, NetworkManager and accept_ra

available in the RA). Thanks! > > But what is the correct way to do this "ip token set" with > > NetworkManager (or in spite of NetworkManager ;)? > > # nmcli c mod enp4s0 ipv6.addr-gen-mode eui64 > # nmcli c mod enp4s0 ipv6.token ::deca:fbad:c0:ffee This is not perma

Re: IPv6, ip token, NetworkManager and accept_ra

Am 02.02.2024 schrieb Ralph Aichinger : > In my quest to advance the IPv6 preparedness of my home LAN I want to > find a solution to use IP tokens on all my clients. IP tokens (keeping > the host part of the IPv6 address static while getting the subnet part > by SLAAC) seem very e

IPv6, ip token, NetworkManager and accept_ra

Hi fellow Debian users! In my quest to advance the IPv6 preparedness of my home LAN I want to find a solution to use IP tokens on all my clients. IP tokens (keeping the host part of the IPv6 address static while getting the subnet part by SLAAC) seem very elegant to me, because it avoids DHCPv6

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 1/29/24, David Wright wrote: > On Sat 27 Jan 2024 at 14:50:25 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote: >> On 1/19/24, David Wright wrote: >> > On Fri 19 Jan 2024 at 22:19:21 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote: >> >> Package dependencies to me are just DAGs, >> > Are they? No circular dependencies? >> >>

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On Sat 27 Jan 2024 at 14:50:25 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote: > On 1/19/24, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 19 Jan 2024 at 22:19:21 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote: > >> Package dependencies to me are just DAGs, > > Are they? No circular dependencies? > > The way I see them, "circular dependen

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 1/19/24, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 19 Jan 2024 at 22:19:21 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote: >> Package dependencies to me are just DAGs, > Are they? No circular dependencies? The way I see them, "circular dependencies" are "cultural". "organizational" issues not essentially technical ones

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

On 24/01/2024 04:18, Geert Stappers wrote: |root@nero:~# nmcli device | grep -e wifi -e gsm |ttyACM1 gsm unavailable -- |wlp2s0wifi unavailable -- If the devices are hard-blocked then you may need to enable them in firmware (BIOS) setup. Old lap

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:36:57AM +0200, Anssi Saari wrote: > Geert Stappers writes: > > > > Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device, > > but `nmcli device` does not. > > And you're sure wwx028037ec0200 is a WIFI device? My WWAN device > sometim

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

David Wright writes: > On Mon 22 Jan 2024 at 06:36:57 (+0200), Anssi Saari wrote: >> And you're sure wwx028037ec0200 is a WIFI device? My WWAN device >> sometimes comes up with a wwx ID like that, sometimes wwan0. I even >> explicitly rename it to wwan0 if that happens to make life easier. > > I

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

On Mon 22 Jan 2024 at 06:36:57 (+0200), Anssi Saari wrote: > Geert Stappers writes: > > > > Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device, > > but `nmcli device` does not. > > And you're sure wwx028037ec0200 is a WIFI device? My WWAN device > sometim

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

Geert Stappers writes: > Hello, > > > > Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device, > but `nmcli device` does not. And you're sure wwx028037ec0200 is a WIFI device? My WWAN device sometimes comes up with a wwx ID like that, sometimes wwan0. I even explicitly ren

Re: Regarding: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 18:24:53 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 05:34:53PM +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > > Am 21.01.2024 um 17:21:13 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers privat: > > > > > It was a firmware thing. > > > > How did you solve it? > > > > In the private[1] message was, b

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI firmware related

On Mon 22 Jan 2024 at 00:05:08 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote: > On 21/01/2024 23:33, Geert Stappers wrote: > > The repair: > > > > wget > > http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb > > > > sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb > >

Re: Regarding: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 05:34:53PM +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 21.01.2024 um 17:21:13 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers privat: > > > It was a firmware thing. > > How did you solve it? > In the private[1] message was, besides 'Hello Marco': } } Will reporting also to the ML That report became ht

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI firmware related

On 21/01/2024 23:33, Geert Stappers wrote: The repair: wget http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb sudo dpkg -i firmware-iwlwifi_20210315-3_all.deb https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#n

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI firmware related

On Sun 21 Jan 2024 at 17:33:57 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote: > [7.854942] iwlwifi :02:00.0: reporting RF_KILL (radio disabled) > [7.860452] iwlwifi :02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio. > [8.356275] iwlwifi :02:00.0 wlp2s0: renamed from wlan0 Run rfkill and, if i

Re: Regarding: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

Am 21.01.2024 um 17:21:13 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers: > It was a firmware thing. How did you solve it?

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI firmware related

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 03:58:18PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device, > but `nmcli device` does not. > > How to make NetworkManager aware of a WIFI device? > Have the firmware for WIFI card ins

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

Am 21.01.2024 um 16:36:09 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers: > Even better :-) > > It doesn't exist in /etc/network Is system-networkd being used? How did you configure it in the past?

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 04:26:46PM +0100, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 21.01.2024 um 15:58:18 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers: > > > How to make NetworkManager aware of a WIFI device? > > Is the device commented out in /etc/network? > Even better :-) It doesn't exist in /etc/network |root@nero:/etc/n

Re: ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

Am 21.01.2024 um 15:58:18 Uhr schrieb Geert Stappers: > How to make NetworkManager aware of a WIFI device? Is the device commented out in /etc/network?

ip link versus nmcli device, WIFI

Hello, Here on a laptop does `ip link` see a WIFI device, but `nmcli device` does not. How to make NetworkManager aware of a WIFI device? root@nero:~# ip --brief link show lo UNKNOWN00:00:00:00:00:00 enp8s0 UP 04:7d:7b:d4:3d:68

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On Fri 19 Jan 2024 at 22:19:21 (+), Albretch Mueller wrote: > Package dependencies to me are just DAGs, Are they? No circular dependencies? > [ … ] I haven’t found a book yet, explaining it all. > At times I have found great explanations about single aspects. What sales figures would you e

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 1/19/24, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:22:52PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote: >> On 1/19/24, Max Nikulin wrote: >> > Precise steps >> > depend on degree of your paranoia. >> ... and mine is of the totally irrevocable, even joyful kind; so, >> where are the steps? >> I

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 1/19/24, Max Nikulin wrote: When adding a third-party repository, evaluate that GPG key you are going to add really belongs to repository maintainers. The sentence above is important to get the next phrase right. On 19/01/2024 22:22, Albretch Mueller wrote: On 1/19/24, Max Nikulin wrote:

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:22:52PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote: > On 1/19/24, Max Nikulin wrote: > > Precise steps > > depend on degree of your paranoia. > > ... and mine is of the totally irrevocable, even joyful kind; so, > where are the steps? > > I have always believe that Debian’s basic

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 1/19/24, Max Nikulin wrote: > Precise steps > depend on degree of your paranoia. ... and mine is of the totally irrevocable, even joyful kind; so, where are the steps? I have always believe that Debian’s basic assumptions about using the Internet as a relatively secure, “private” venue are

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 18/01/2024 12:45, Albretch Mueller wrote: On 1/14/24, Max Nikulin wrote: Generally just pay attention that GPG keys for repositories are obtained through trusted channels. How do you functionally (that is, give me the step-by-step command line statements, ... in order to) do that? Verif

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

48.2 kB] Get:5 file:/run/live/medium bookworm/non-free-firmware amd64 Packages [30.4 kB] Err:6 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease 302 Found [IP: 151.101.162.132 80] Reading package lists... Done E: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/InRelease 302 Fou

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 14/01/2024 04:43, Jeffrey Walton wrote: And use of HTTP in other fetches is dangerous, and HTTPS should be used. See . https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-3462 states that this particular

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

unexpected size (7009 != 20884). Mirror sync in progress? > > [IP: 184.31.10.246 443] > >Hashes of expected file: > > - > > SHA256:eac7c87ae7118d29d55d497c8a3873dd1c0c062dd3df06ca74a4710ddcb950d9 > > - MD5Sum:40029a8ea9aa7a6c9ddf3aa60404c17a [weak] > >

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

h Javascript enabled) and go *anywhere*. Once you get your IP "logged in" to the portal, apt-get might start working again. Until the next time it wants you to re-authenticate anyway. Don't think "But these 11 URLs worked, why does the 12th one not work?" Nobody knows. Don't try to figure it out. Just submit, or get a real Internet connection.

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 06:19:06PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote: > My access to the Internet seems to be fine. I tested various urls: In that case, I'm out. Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

rote: >> > On 13 Jan 2024 13:44 +, from lbrt...@gmail.com (Albretch Mueller): >> >> E: Failed to fetch >> >> https://myattwg.att.com/olam/jsp/login/uverse/VS/UverseAccount.html >> >> File has unexpected size (7009 != 20884). Mirror sync in progress? >>

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

.att.com/olam/jsp/login/uverse/VS/UverseAccount.html > >> File has unexpected size (7009 != 20884). Mirror sync in progress? > >> [IP: 184.31.10.246 443] > >>Hashes of expected file: > >> - > >> SHA256:eac7c87ae7118d29d55d497c8a3873dd1c0c062dd3d

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

4). Mirror sync in progress? >> [IP: 184.31.10.246 443] >>Hashes of expected file: >> - >> SHA256:eac7c87ae7118d29d55d497c8a3873dd1c0c062dd3df06ca74a4710ddcb950d9 >> - MD5Sum:40029a8ea9aa7a6c9ddf3aa60404c17a [weak] >> - Filesize:20884 [weak] > >

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

009 != 20884). Mirror sync in progress? > > [IP: 184.31.10.246 443] > >Hashes of expected file: > > - > > SHA256:eac7c87ae7118d29d55d497c8a3873dd1c0c062dd3df06ca74a4710ddcb950d9 > > - MD5Sum:40029a8ea9aa7a6c9ddf3aa60404c17a [weak] > > - Filesize:20884

Re: File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

On 13 Jan 2024 13:44 +, from lbrt...@gmail.com (Albretch Mueller): > E: Failed to fetch > https://myattwg.att.com/olam/jsp/login/uverse/VS/UverseAccount.html > File has unexpected size (7009 != 20884). Mirror sync in progress? > [IP: 184.31.10.246 443] >Hashes o

File has unexpected size (x != y). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: ...] ...

(7009 != 20884). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 184.31.10.246 443] Hashes of expected file: - SHA256:eac7c87ae7118d29d55d497c8a3873dd1c0c062dd3df06ca74a4710ddcb950d9 - MD5Sum:40029a8ea9aa7a6c9ddf3aa60404c17a [weak] - Filesize:20884 [weak] Err:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64

Re: dedicated IP

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:03:04PM -, Curt wrote: >> NordVPN advertises very heavily in France on television and claims to >> provide safety against bad actors (personified as villainous figures >> observing your every move) when using it. It

Re: dedicated IP

Hello, On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:03:04PM -, Curt wrote: > NordVPN advertises very heavily in France on television and claims to > provide safety against bad actors (personified as villainous figures > observing your every move) when using it. It's their only selling point. And obviously th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >