old Debian files, of possible interest to Debian archivists/historians, others

2025-06-07 Thread Michael Paoli
In clearing out my older archives, deduplicating the redundant, etc. I still found many Debian files missing from or not present in official Debian locations. Some of these may also be older than what Debian may wish to preserve. I believe they all date from slink (2.1) through woody (3.0). I be

Four new mailing lists of possible interest

2019-02-07 Thread Rich Kulawiec
Use the email addresses/URLs to subscribe, if you wish. mint-users Discussion of the Mint Linux distribution mint-users-requ...@firemountain.net http://www.firemountain.net/mailman/listinfo/mint-users (independent, not affiliated with the Mint L

Re: a potential investor and collaborator has shown a little interest in Climostat

2018-01-26 Thread Michael Fothergill
chael Fothergill wrote: >>> >>> Dear Paul, >>> >>> I have agreed a meeting with the executive from Calysta at the Wilton >>> site in February. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> Climostat Ltd >&g

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Steve Litt
with > > > increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main > > > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. > > > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict > > > voting rights for members who ha

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/16/2014 11:30 PM, Marty wrote: On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote: But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Scott Ferguson
reasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's >>> my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. >>> >>> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict >>> voting rights for members who have a financial interes

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-17 Thread Henning Follmann
gt; > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the publ

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Marty
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote: But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and now they are worth billions, by start

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Ric Moore
hing" Do you mean, job-related ethics? to do there just as we do on this list. I'm glad you replied because you're just the person to query. When you discussed job-related ethics at lunchtime, did the subject of conflict of interest ever come up, regarding voting in Debian?

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Brian
as I consider recent trends. > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. > > Conflicts of i

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
ers consider an amendment to restrict voting rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid developer should probably not be voting as a technical comm

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-16 Thread Rob Owens
Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid developer should probably not be

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:06:00 +0900 Joel Rees wrote: > 2014/10/16 5:46 "Ric Moore" : > > > > On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > > >> We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company > >> Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean). > >> Wonderful L

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 16/10/14 00:14, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > > Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit : >> On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wro

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Marty
e "Right Thing" Do you mean, job-related ethics? to do there just as we do on this list. I'm glad you replied because you're just the person to query. When you discussed job-related ethics at lunchtime, did the subject of conflict of interest ever come up, regarding vot

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 05:06 PM, Joel Rees wrote: 2014/10/16 5:46 "Ric Moore" mailto:wayward4...@gmail.com>>: > > On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > >> We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company >> Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean). >>

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 22:44:18 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are > > there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks? > > http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ > > No, that's

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote: > As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are > there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks? http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ No, that's not meant as a joke. As far as I understand, this is about the only w

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Joel Rees
2014/10/16 5:46 "Ric Moore" : > > On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > >> We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company >> Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean). >> Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly accepted >> money

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote: We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean). Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly accepted money from Microsoft and dropped all their Windows

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 10/15/2014 07:08 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >>Check ou

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Keith Peter
g people to work on Debian is one way of getting > more contributors and keeping existing contributors happy. > >> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting >> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any >> project used by D

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Brian
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 12:53:52 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900 > Joel Rees wrote: > > > 2014/10/15 1:47 "Brian" : > > > > > > > Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted > > > character assassination of a group dedicated workers. > > > > Do you

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900 Joel Rees wrote: > 2014/10/15 1:47 "Brian" : > > > > Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted > > character assassination of a group dedicated workers. > > Do you realize that a lot of your posts, jumping on anti-systemd > topics, might app

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:11:10 +0100 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, > > surprise. > > Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe > betide any compa

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:09:53 +0100 Brian napísal: > On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org > wrote: > > > Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : > > >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > >>Check out what single company has

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Joel Rees
ser, as I consider recent trends. > > > > > > > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > > > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > > > > project used by Debian, to

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread John Hasler
Steve Litt writes: > Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, > surprise. Better Red Hat than just about anybody else. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread berenger . morel
Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Mike McGinn
Comments inline below: On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 06:37:57 Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : > >> On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org > >> > >> wrote: > >>> Le 15.10.2014 09:

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > > Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : >> On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org >> wrote: >> >>> Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >>> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrot

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread berenger . morel
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit : On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >>Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Brian
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : > >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > >>Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, > >>surprise. > > > >Damned for their

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 10:41:12, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > Maybe you want. > But I think that most users just want it to work fine and efficiently, which > does not necessarily imply being sold massively around the world. > > The fact is, that linux is actually a success, but it has nev

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread berenger . morel
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide any company that actually gets

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-15 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, > surprise. Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide any company that actually gets us there... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-u

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:35:54 -0400 Marty wrote: > > http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/whos-writing-linux > > Say hello to our new bosses? Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise, surprise. SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.co

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Marty
consider an amendment to restrict voting > > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. > > > > > > > > > > Why, what is the reason for that? Explain

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Marty
butors and keeping existing contributors happy. I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. Everyone who contributes to Debian has an intere

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Brian
t Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Martin Read
On 14/10/14 16:05, Scott Ferguson wrote: And how should we interpret that in light of your signature and constant plugging of your business on the list? Perhaps Joey Hess's signature holds the answer? I presume you mean Joel Rees (yes, I get their names mixed up occasionally too), since Joey H

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Don Armstrong
rs happy. > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. Everyone who contributes to Debian has an interest in what the proj

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Scott Ferguson
ty and technical quality. It's my main >>> concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. >>> >>> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting >>> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Henning Follmann
ncreasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main > > > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. > > > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > > rights for members who have a financial

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Rusi Mody
; > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. >

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Steve Litt
ern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends. > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. > &

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread David Guyot
for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. > > -- David Guyot Administrateur système, réseau et télécom / Sysadmin Europe Camions Interactive / Stockway Moulin Collot F-88500 Ambacourt 03 29 30 47 85 si

Re: Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Henning Follmann
members consider an amendment to restrict voting > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. > > Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less objective or anyone having no fina

Conflict of interest in Debian

2014-10-14 Thread Marty
ave a financial interest in Debian or in any project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.or

Re: autofs interest ?

2011-09-27 Thread Bob Proulx
Stephane Durieux wrote: > A simple question: > from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory) > than "traditionnal" nfs ? AutoFS is simply a automated mount service for NFS. AutoFS doesn't replace NFS. The autofs simply gets nfs going by mounting remote nfs filesystems on

autofs interest ?

2011-09-27 Thread Stephane Durieux
Hello, A simple question: from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory) than "traditionnal" nfs ? From a client point of view I think the fact to unmount directories frees ressources? But does a moint point consumes so much (memory ?) And concerning the network Thank

Re: [OT: of interest only to new Gmail users] Re: test message

2007-01-08 Thread sdpatt2
on Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:18:27PM +0200 Andrei Popescu mumbled: > A more primitive hack is to configure your MUA to save outgoing mail to > the same folder. This way you can still follow the thread correctly, > but you have to check in the archives if your message reached the list. > Nah. If g

Re: [OT: of interest only to new Gmail users] Re: test message

2007-01-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:42:59 -0500 Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ: > > > > Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts. > > But I receive other po

Re: [OT: of interest only to new Gmail users] Re: test message

2007-01-08 Thread Alan Ianson
On Mon January 8 2007 08:42, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ: > > > > Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts. > > But I receive other posts and even answers to my ow

Re: [OT: of interest only to new Gmail users] Re: test message

2007-01-08 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote: > I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ: > > Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts. > But I receive other posts and even answers to my own posts. > > A: gmail will discard your own posts because they co

Re: [OT: of interest only to new Gmail users] Re: test message

2007-01-07 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:20:08 -0500 "Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6 Jan 2007 15:16:56 -0800, wurong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I was rejected for my first one so I want to try again > > > > Unless someone replies to a gmail email, it doesn't show up in your > inbox. Perh

[OT: of interest only to new Gmail users] Re: test message

2007-01-06 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 6 Jan 2007 15:16:56 -0800, wurong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was rejected for my first one so I want to try again Unless someone replies to a gmail email, it doesn't show up in your inbox. Perhaps that's why you thought your message was "rejected"? Patrick

FINANCIAL PROPOSAL OF $32M WITH YOUR DEFINITE DETAILS OF INTEREST FROM JULIAN P FOERSTER LONDON

2006-07-10 Thread JulianPThurston Thurston
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]FINANCIAL PROPOSAL OF $32M WITH YOUR DEFINITE DETAILS OF INTEREST FROM JULIAN P FOERSTER LONDON- JulianPThurston Thurston

Any interest in Debian packages of Geant 4?

2005-12-22 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
27;ve spent some time over the last few days Debianizing it. The packages are still very rough so I'm not making them public (yet), but I am curious to know whether there is enough interest in Geant 4 on Debian to make it worthwhile to eventually have it in the official archive. The total inst

General Interest

2005-11-20 Thread Katipo
Something that some might find of interest... The MINIMUM PRIZE 2005 to Richard Stallman Cittadellarte Fondazione Pistoletto gives the prize, in Tunis, to Richard Stallman for the GNU/Linux project. The prize will be delivered by Minister Gilberto Gil. _ minimum prize The

Re: Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-26 Thread peter colton
8:29, Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo wrote: > May be: > > 1.- Interest > 2.- Time > 3.- Read, read, read, read :-D > > > Thanks > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: < >

Re: Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-24 Thread Christian Convey
gt; wrote: > May be: > > 1.- Interest > 2.- Time > 3.- Read, read, read, read :-D > > > > Thanks > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: < > >> > > Sent: Sunda

Re: Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-24 Thread Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo
May be: 1.- Interest 2.- Time 3.- Read, read, read, read :-D > Thanks > > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: < >> > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM > Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to joi

Re: Re: Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-24 Thread Carl Fink
I'm returning discussion to the mailing list. Debian list policy is that private replies are discouraged unless requested. On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:22:37AM -0700, Eduardo wrote: > Thanks for answering. > > I want to program real time applications, like a robot using PC-104 > platforms, so I'm

Re: Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-23 Thread Alvin Oga
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Eduardo wrote: > Thanks you will need a real-time distro that supports the resolution and hardware you need vs a generic linux distro google/yahoo for your hardware you want to support and linux to come up with suitable distro ... or tweek/change any existing distro to be w

Re: Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-23 Thread Carl Fink
The best way of learning it (to the extent that means anything) is to do it. If you could be just a bit more specific on what you want to learn, people might be more helpful. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you attempt to fix something that isn't broken,

Hello I'm new to Linux, anybody can tell me the best way of learning it. I'm interest in realtime applications

2005-10-23 Thread Eduardo
Thanks - Original Message - From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: < > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to join the club.. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

[serverbeach.com #138693] Thanks for your interest in ServerBeach

2004-09-23 Thread sales
Your request has been entered into our tracking system. A sales representative will be contacting you shortly to answer all of your questions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Thank You for Your Interest in Lakeshore

2004-02-02 Thread Mark Maas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My name is Jashwant Joseph and my phone number is 310 542-7758. I am applying for Accounts Payable jobs in your company. If you have any openings in this field please contact me. I am sending my resume. Thank you. First: Ahum? Second: Isn't "*ACHEIVMENTS*" actually writt

Re: Thank You for Your Interest in Lakeshore

2004-02-02 Thread FeejeeJoe
My name is Jashwant Joseph and my phone number is 310 542-7758. I am applying for Accounts Payable jobs in your company. If you have any openings  in this field please contact me. I am sending my resume. Thank you. Joseph3.doc Description: Binary data

Thank You for Your Interest in Lakeshore

2003-09-09 Thread Human Resources
become available. We appreciate your interest in joining the Lakeshore team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bzedit (for bzflag) package interest?

2003-01-17 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, Would anyone be interested in a bzedit package? It's the world editor for the bzflag game. I'm doing a quick pole to see if anyone has interest, and if so, the bzflag maintainer may consider creating a package. I'm not subscribed to the list - please send/Cc: replies

Re: Interest of SMP kernel :)

2002-09-19 Thread Michael Heironimus
If you're using make-kpkg, I think you'll have to set CONCURRENCY_LEVEL. The option is documented in the kernel-pkg.conf man page. On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 05:13:19AM +0300, Egor Tur wrote: > grep MAKE conf.vars > MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3 > > time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6

Interest of SMP kernel :)

2002-09-19 Thread Egor Tur
Hi. $ uname -a Linux pupkin 2.4.19 #1 SMP Mon Sep 16 08:45:01 EEST 2002 i686 unknown I have 2 processors, 256 memory, 256 swap cd /usr/src/linux see Documentation/smp.txt; grep MAKE conf.vars MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3 time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6 kernel_image

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-06 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Btw, I'm doing this mainly because I needed it for a project. If you want > to be the official maintainer be my guest. I can send you my work when it > is finished. Well, I am packaging cyrus 2.1, and all packages are named cyrus21-*, not cyrus2-*. Y

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > How did you get it to work with the currently broken SASL v2 which is what > is holding my packages from being uploaded? > > Cyrus 2.1 CVS REQUIRES SASL2 to work. Or are you packaging 2.0.x ? > Yes this is 2.0.16 which I believe is the late

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-06 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rupa Schomaker wrote: > > Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2: > > Yes I know but they are taking their time about it. I have a mostly > functioning package now, I just need to tidy it up some more before making > anoth

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rupa Schomaker wrote: > > Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2: > Yes I know but they are taking their time about it. I have a mostly functioning package now, I just need to tidy it up some more before making another announcement. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-05 Thread Rupa Schomaker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2: http://people.debian.org/~hmh/cyrus2/ and in wnpp: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=108942&repeatmerged=yes I currently use my own cyrus2 and will do so until there is a cyrus2 in the debian arc

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-05 Thread Erik Steffl
Nigel Pauli wrote: > > On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > [Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of > > days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.] > > > > The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer > > seems to be M

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-04 Thread Nigel Pauli
On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > [Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of > days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.] > > The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer > seems to be MIA so I'm thinking of doing a pack

Re: Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-02 Thread Sean
I would love to see a cyrus2 package! Sean On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 01:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > [Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of days > ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.] > > The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer seems > to

Any interest in a cyrus2 package

2002-02-02 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
[Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.] The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer seems to be MIA so I'm thinking of doing a package for cyrus2. The limiting factor right now is my little girl is

interest

2001-06-25 Thread linda perrotti
existingbusiness model in a huge way.If there is significant interest please contact me at once. Best Regards,Linda Perrotti MarketShareAdvisory sosresources services.com 631-592-1360 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-29 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > i'm not an expert in these things, but i would send the changes to the > upstream maintainers from aureal. Are there any upstream maintainers? I've heard stuff about them abandoning Linux development and possibly going out of business altogether.

Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-28 Thread Steve
Also interested... - Original Message - > Interested. VERY. > > Didi Damian wrote: > > > Sure there's interest. > > > > * Alan Sobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100] > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald B

Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-28 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
Interested. VERY. Didi Damian wrote: > Sure there's interest. > > * Alan Sobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100] > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > > Subject says it all, I made this for my own ne

Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-28 Thread Didi Damian
Sure there's interest. * Alan Sobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100] > On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > > Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other > > > people might be interested.

Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-27 Thread Alan Sobey
30. i386 platform > > only. > > Yes, there's interest here.

Re: Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-27 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other > people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5 tarball > and compiles into .debs for au8810, au8820, and au8830. i386 platform > only. > i'm not an expert in these things, but i would send the changes to

Any interest in an Aureal Vortex soundcard driver .debs?

2000-04-27 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5 tarball and compiles into .debs for au8810, au8820, and au8830. i386 platform only. I'll put it up somewhere if there is interest. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas &l

Re: Any interest in SNMP web based network monitor?

1997-10-30 Thread Steve Kostecke
If anyone is interested... I've posted an experimental (unofficial) package of mrtg-2.4.1 at: http://www.mindspring.com/~stk3/debian/mrtg.html or ftp://ftp.mindspring.com/users/stk3/debian/mrtg/mrtg_2.4.1-2_i386.deb --==_Exmh_-19745690190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Steve Koste

Re: Any interest in SNMP web based network monitor?

1997-10-28 Thread Steve Kostecke
Ed Donovan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: [snip] > It might still be a good candidate for some work; the package is > version 2.2, and MRTG 2.3 has been out for a while now. [snip] Looks like we have the inevitable bit of duplication going on... I've got a (~) package of MRTG-2.4 that I made for m

Re: Any interest in SNMP web based network monitor?

1997-10-19 Thread Ed Donovan
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> R. Chris Ross wrote: >> For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called >> MRTG. Joey> It's already a debian package: (snip) It might still be a good candidate for some work; the package is version 2.2,

Re: Any interest in SNMP web based network monitor?

1997-10-17 Thread Joey Hess
R. Chris Ross wrote: > For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called > MRTG. It's already a debian package: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>dpkg -s mrtg Package: mrtg Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: contrib/net Installed-Size: 223 Maintainer: Dermot Bradley <[EMA

Any interest in SNMP web based network monitor?

1997-10-17 Thread R. Chris Ross
For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called MRTG. Both the current release and the beta for the next release are running nicely, showing html graphic display of SNMP data. The package is set up for monitoring network traffic but can be easily modified to monitor other