In clearing out my older archives, deduplicating the redundant, etc.
I still found many Debian files missing from or not present in official
Debian locations. Some of these may also be older than what Debian may
wish to preserve. I believe they all date from slink (2.1) through
woody (3.0). I be
Use the email addresses/URLs to subscribe, if you wish.
mint-users Discussion of the Mint Linux distribution
mint-users-requ...@firemountain.net
http://www.firemountain.net/mailman/listinfo/mint-users
(independent, not affiliated with the Mint L
chael Fothergill wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Paul,
>>>
>>> I have agreed a meeting with the executive from Calysta at the Wilton
>>> site in February.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Climostat Ltd
>&g
with
> > > increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main
> > > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
> > >
> > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict
> > > voting rights for members who ha
On 10/16/2014 11:30 PM, Marty wrote:
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can
do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around
a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and
reasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's
>>> my main concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
>>>
>>> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict
>>> voting rights for members who have a financial interes
gt; > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
> >
> > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the publ
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can
do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around
a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and
now they are worth billions, by start
hing"
Do you mean, job-related ethics?
to do there just as we do on this list.
I'm glad you replied because you're just the person to query.
When you discussed job-related ethics at lunchtime, did the subject of
conflict of interest ever come up, regarding voting in Debian?
as I consider recent trends.
> >
> > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
>
> Conflicts of i
ers consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid developer should
probably not be voting as a technical comm
Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Conflicts of interest are not just financial. Even an unpaid developer should
probably not be
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:06:00 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/16 5:46 "Ric Moore" :
> >
> > On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> >> We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
> >> Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean).
> >> Wonderful L
On 16/10/14 00:14, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
>> On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wro
e "Right Thing"
Do you mean, job-related ethics?
to do there just as we do on this list.
I'm glad you replied because you're just the person to query.
When you discussed job-related ethics at lunchtime, did the subject of
conflict of interest ever come up, regarding vot
On 10/15/2014 05:06 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
2014/10/16 5:46 "Ric Moore" mailto:wayward4...@gmail.com>>:
>
> On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>
>> We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
>> Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean).
>>
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 22:44:18 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are
> > there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks?
>
> http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
>
> No, that's
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 21:37:57, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> As far as I'm aware Debian has *never* been sold anywhere, nor are
> there plans to - did I miss another meeting down the docks?
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
No, that's not meant as a joke. As far as I understand, this is about
the only w
2014/10/16 5:46 "Ric Moore" :
>
> On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>
>> We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
>> Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean).
>> Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly accepted
>> money
On 10/15/2014 12:39 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
We've actually been in this place before. Wonderful Linux company
Caldera became SCO (oversimplification, but you know what I mean).
Wonderful Linux company Corel changed their CEO, and promptly accepted
money from Microsoft and dropped all their Windows
On 10/15/2014 07:08 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>>Check ou
g people to work on Debian is one way of getting
> more contributors and keeping existing contributors happy.
>
>> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
>> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
>> project used by D
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 12:53:52 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900
> Joel Rees wrote:
>
> > 2014/10/15 1:47 "Brian" :
> > >
>
> > > Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted
> > > character assassination of a group dedicated workers.
> >
> > Do you
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:37:37 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/15 1:47 "Brian" :
> >
> > Give me swearing in posts rather than innuendo and attempted
> > character assassination of a group dedicated workers.
>
> Do you realize that a lot of your posts, jumping on anti-systemd
> topics, might app
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:11:10 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
> > surprise.
>
> Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe
> betide any compa
Ahoj,
Dňa Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:09:53 +0100 Brian
napísal:
> On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
> wrote:
>
> > Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
> > >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > >>Check out what single company has
ser, as I consider recent trends.
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > > > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > > > > project used by Debian, to
Steve Litt writes:
> Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
> surprise.
Better Red Hat than just about anybody else.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Le 15.10.2014 12:37, Scott Ferguson a écrit :
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12
Comments inline below:
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 06:37:57 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
> >> On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Le 15.10.2014 09:
On 15/10/14 22:08, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
>> On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
>>> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrot
Le 15.10.2014 12:09, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>>Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers.
Surprise,
On Wed 15 Oct 2014 at 10:41:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> >>Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
> >>surprise.
> >
> >Damned for their
On Mi, 15 oct 14, 10:41:12, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> Maybe you want.
> But I think that most users just want it to work fine and efficiently, which
> does not necessarily imply being sold massively around the world.
>
> The fact is, that linux is actually a success, but it has nev
Le 15.10.2014 09:11, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe
betide any
company that actually gets
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:51:07AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
> surprise.
Damned for their success. We want Linux to be successful, but woe betide any
company that actually gets us there...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-u
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:35:54 -0400
Marty wrote:
>
> http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/whos-writing-linux
>
> Say hello to our new bosses?
Check out what single company has 30% of the gatekeepers. Surprise,
surprise.
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.co
consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Why, what is the reason for that? Explain
butors and keeping existing contributors happy.
I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Everyone who contributes to Debian has an intere
t Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > > > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > > > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
On 14/10/14 16:05, Scott Ferguson wrote:
And how should we interpret that in light of your signature and constant
plugging of your business on the list?
Perhaps Joey Hess's signature holds the answer?
I presume you mean Joel Rees (yes, I get their names mixed up
occasionally too), since Joey H
rs happy.
> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
Everyone who contributes to Debian has an interest in what the proj
ty and technical quality. It's my main
>>> concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
>>>
>>> I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
>>> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in
ncreasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main
> > > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
> > >
> > > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > > rights for members who have a financial
; > concern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
> > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
>
ern as a Debian user, as I consider recent trends.
> >
> > I hope that Debian members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> > rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> > project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
> &
for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
>
>
--
David Guyot
Administrateur système, réseau et télécom / Sysadmin
Europe Camions Interactive / Stockway
Moulin Collot
F-88500 Ambacourt
03 29 30 47 85
si
members consider an amendment to restrict voting
> rights for members who have a financial interest in Debian or in any
> project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
>
>
Why, what is the reason for that? Explain why they are less objective or
anyone having no fina
ave a financial interest in Debian or in any
project used by Debian, to promote and protect the public interest.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.or
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> A simple question:
> from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory)
> than "traditionnal" nfs ?
AutoFS is simply a automated mount service for NFS. AutoFS doesn't
replace NFS. The autofs simply gets nfs going by mounting remote nfs
filesystems on
Hello,
A simple question:
from a server point of view does autofs costs less (cpu, io, memory) than
"traditionnal" nfs ?
From a client point of view I think the fact to unmount directories frees
ressources?
But does a moint point consumes so much (memory ?)
And concerning the network
Thank
on Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:18:27PM +0200 Andrei Popescu mumbled:
> A more primitive hack is to configure your MUA to save outgoing mail to
> the same folder. This way you can still follow the thread correctly,
> but you have to check in the archives if your message reached the list.
>
Nah. If g
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:42:59 -0500
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ:
> >
> > Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts.
> > But I receive other po
On Mon January 8 2007 08:42, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ:
> >
> > Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts.
> > But I receive other posts and even answers to my ow
On Sunday 07 January 2007 04:27, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I think this gmail quirk should go to Raju's FAQ:
>
> Q: I posted from my gmail account, but I don't receive my own posts.
> But I receive other posts and even answers to my own posts.
>
> A: gmail will discard your own posts because they co
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:20:08 -0500
"Patrick Wiseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2007 15:16:56 -0800, wurong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was rejected for my first one so I want to try again
> >
>
> Unless someone replies to a gmail email, it doesn't show up in your
> inbox. Perh
On 6 Jan 2007 15:16:56 -0800, wurong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was rejected for my first one so I want to try again
Unless someone replies to a gmail email, it doesn't show up in your inbox.
Perhaps that's why you thought your message was "rejected"?
Patrick
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]FINANCIAL PROPOSAL OF $32M WITH YOUR DEFINITE DETAILS OF INTEREST FROM JULIAN P FOERSTER LONDON- JulianPThurston Thurston
27;ve spent some time over the last few days
Debianizing it. The packages are still very rough so I'm not making
them public (yet), but I am curious to know whether there is enough
interest in Geant 4 on Debian to make it worthwhile to eventually have
it in the official archive.
The total inst
Something that some might find of interest...
The MINIMUM PRIZE 2005 to Richard Stallman
Cittadellarte Fondazione Pistoletto gives the prize, in Tunis, to Richard
Stallman for the GNU/Linux project. The prize will be delivered by Minister
Gilberto Gil.
_
minimum prize
The
8:29, Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo wrote:
> May be:
>
> 1.- Interest
> 2.- Time
> 3.- Read, read, read, read :-D
>
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <
>
gt; wrote:
> May be:
>
> 1.- Interest
> 2.- Time
> 3.- Read, read, read, read :-D
>
>
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <
> >>
> > Sent: Sunda
May be:
1.- Interest
2.- Time
3.- Read, read, read, read :-D
> Thanks
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <
>>
> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to joi
I'm returning discussion to the mailing list. Debian list policy is that
private replies are discouraged unless requested.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:22:37AM -0700, Eduardo wrote:
> Thanks for answering.
>
> I want to program real time applications, like a robot using PC-104
> platforms, so I'm
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Eduardo wrote:
> Thanks
you will need a real-time distro that supports the resolution and
hardware you need vs a generic linux distro
google/yahoo for your hardware you want to support and linux
to come up with suitable distro ... or tweek/change any existing
distro to be w
The best way of learning it (to the extent that means anything) is to do it.
If you could be just a bit more specific on what you want to learn, people
might be more helpful.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you attempt to fix something that isn't broken,
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
>
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:11 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Ready to join the club..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Your request has been entered into our tracking system. A sales representative will be
contacting you shortly to answer all of your questions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is Jashwant Joseph and my phone number is 310 542-7758.
I am applying for Accounts Payable jobs in your company. If you have
any openings in this field please contact me. I am sending my resume.
Thank you.
First: Ahum?
Second: Isn't "*ACHEIVMENTS*" actually writt
My name is Jashwant Joseph and my phone number is 310 542-7758.
I am applying for Accounts Payable jobs in your company. If you have any openings in this field please contact me. I am sending my resume.
Thank you.
Joseph3.doc
Description: Binary data
become available.
We appreciate your interest in joining the Lakeshore team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Would anyone be interested in a bzedit package? It's the world
editor for the bzflag game. I'm doing a quick pole to see if anyone
has interest, and if so, the bzflag maintainer may consider creating
a package.
I'm not subscribed to the list - please send/Cc: replies
If you're using make-kpkg, I think you'll have to set CONCURRENCY_LEVEL.
The option is documented in the kernel-pkg.conf man page.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 05:13:19AM +0300, Egor Tur wrote:
> grep MAKE conf.vars
> MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3
>
> time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6
Hi.
$ uname -a
Linux pupkin 2.4.19 #1 SMP Mon Sep 16 08:45:01 EEST 2002 i686 unknown
I have 2 processors, 256 memory, 256 swap
cd /usr/src/linux
see Documentation/smp.txt;
grep MAKE conf.vars
MAKE = /usr/bin/make -j3
time make-kpkg --revision=pupkin.0.6 kernel_image
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Btw, I'm doing this mainly because I needed it for a project. If you want
> to be the official maintainer be my guest. I can send you my work when it
> is finished.
Well, I am packaging cyrus 2.1, and all packages are named cyrus21-*, not
cyrus2-*. Y
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> How did you get it to work with the currently broken SASL v2 which is what
> is holding my packages from being uploaded?
>
> Cyrus 2.1 CVS REQUIRES SASL2 to work. Or are you packaging 2.0.x ?
>
Yes this is 2.0.16 which I believe is the late
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> > Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2:
>
> Yes I know but they are taking their time about it. I have a mostly
> functioning package now, I just need to tidy it up some more before making
> anoth
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
>
> Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2:
>
Yes I know but they are taking their time about it. I have a mostly
functioning package now, I just need to tidy it up some more before making
another announcement.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Looks like someone is already working on cyrus2:
http://people.debian.org/~hmh/cyrus2/
and in wnpp:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=108942&repeatmerged=yes
I currently use my own cyrus2 and will do so until there is a cyrus2
in the debian arc
Nigel Pauli wrote:
>
> On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > [Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of
> > days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
> >
> > The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer
> > seems to be M
On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> [Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of
> days ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
>
> The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer
> seems to be MIA so I'm thinking of doing a pack
I would love to see a cyrus2 package!
Sean
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 01:58, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> [Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of days
> ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
>
> The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer seems
> to
[Apologies if you're seeing this the second time, I post a couple of days
ago but it doesnt seem to have shown up.]
The Debian package of cyrus-imapd is rather old and the maintainer seems
to be MIA so I'm thinking of doing a package for cyrus2. The limiting
factor right now is my little girl is
existingbusiness model in a huge way.If there
is significant interest please contact me at once.
Best Regards,Linda
Perrotti
MarketShareAdvisory
sosresources services.com
631-592-1360
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> i'm not an expert in these things, but i would send the changes to the
> upstream maintainers from aureal.
Are there any upstream maintainers? I've heard stuff about them
abandoning Linux development and possibly going out of business
altogether.
Also interested...
- Original Message -
> Interested. VERY.
>
> Didi Damian wrote:
>
> > Sure there's interest.
> >
> > * Alan Sobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100]
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald B
Interested. VERY.
Didi Damian wrote:
> Sure there's interest.
>
> * Alan Sobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100]
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > Subject says it all, I made this for my own ne
Sure there's interest.
* Alan Sobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27-04-2000 10:08 PM +0100]
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:18:51PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
> > > people might be interested.
30. i386 platform
> > only.
> >
Yes, there's interest here.
> Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
> people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5 tarball
> and compiles into .debs for au8810, au8820, and au8830. i386 platform
> only.
>
i'm not an expert in these things, but i would send the changes to
Subject says it all, I made this for my own needs and I thought other
people might be interested. It is a source diff to Aureals 1.0.5 tarball
and compiles into .debs for au8810, au8820, and au8830. i386 platform
only.
I'll put it up somewhere if there is interest.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas &l
If anyone is interested...
I've posted an experimental (unofficial) package of mrtg-2.4.1 at:
http://www.mindspring.com/~stk3/debian/mrtg.html
or
ftp://ftp.mindspring.com/users/stk3/debian/mrtg/mrtg_2.4.1-2_i386.deb
--==_Exmh_-19745690190
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Steve Koste
Ed Donovan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
[snip]
> It might still be a good candidate for some work; the package is
> version 2.2, and MRTG 2.3 has been out for a while now.
[snip]
Looks like we have the inevitable bit of duplication going on...
I've got a (~) package of MRTG-2.4 that I made for m
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> R. Chris Ross wrote:
>> For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called
>> MRTG.
Joey> It's already a debian package:
(snip)
It might still be a good candidate for some work; the package is version
2.2,
R. Chris Ross wrote:
> For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called
> MRTG.
It's already a debian package:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>dpkg -s mrtg
Package: mrtg
Status: install ok installed
Priority: extra
Section: contrib/net
Installed-Size: 223
Maintainer: Dermot Bradley <[EMA
For the past couple of weeks I have been using a package called
MRTG. Both the current release and the beta for the next release are
running nicely, showing html graphic display of SNMP data. The package is
set up for monitoring network traffic but can be easily modified to monitor
other
96 matches
Mail list logo