Re: intel_pstate vs acpi-cpufreq freq scale

2017-01-17 Thread Julian Brooks
After some discussion with Liquorix people (who are still not convinced by intel_pstate) http://techpatterns.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=12509#12509 I'm going to try out the new 'schedutils' option with acpi-cpufreq See how it goes eh. Regards, Julian On 16 January 2017 at 23:49, Julian Brooks

Re: intel_pstate vs acpi-cpufreq freq scale

2017-01-16 Thread Julian Brooks
Dear Luis, Many thanks for your input and guidance here. 'Have you tried to see if this happens with debian's official kernel?' Doh! Of course. Yes I have now, and intel_pstate is active - yay. Complete newb with any kind of kernel config/tweaking/rebuilding - need to do some reading-up. Thanks

Re: intel_pstate vs acpi-cpufreq freq scale

2017-01-16 Thread Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso
On lunes, 16 de enero de 2017 1:13:09 (CET) Julian Brooks wrote: > Hi all, Hi Julian, > Fresh install of Sid, with > liquorix 4.9-3 (2017-01-07) x86_64 kernel (for RT audio work). > Have also installed linrunner's TLP. Have you tried to see if this happens with debian's official kernel? > My un

intel_pstate vs acpi-cpufreq freq scale

2017-01-15 Thread Julian Brooks
Hi all, I've got a new machine: LENOVO ThinkPad X230 i5 23252GG To replace my ol' trusty x61s. Fresh install of Sid, with liquorix 4.9-3 (2017-01-07) x86_64 kernel (for RT audio work). Have also installed linrunner's TLP. My understanding is that the x230's Ivy Bridge processor should make use o