On Thu 17 Jul 2025 at 15:26:15 (-0400), Šarūnas Burdulis wrote:
> On 2025-07-17 2:46 PM, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
>
> > My internet service is by way of a dish out in the yard, and I have
> > no idea where the base station is for the uplink to that particular
> > satellites. How best to deal w
On 2025-07-17 2:46 PM, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
My internet service is by way of a dish out in the yard, and I have
no idea where the base station is for the uplink to that particular
satellites. How best to deal with that, I wonder?
Not sure about the base station, but traceroute to a kn
On Wednesday 16 July 2025 05:45:28 pm Andy Smith wrote:
> The "easy route" through that set of dialogs has you say where you are
> located and then it offers a few different Debian mirrors that make
> sense for that location, however it does also let you type in your own.
My internet service is b
On 7/16/25 15:03, Titus Newswanger wrote:
for Debian 12 I do a minimal install from the unmodified net install
iso without network cable plugged in.
I forgot to mention, it will want to connect to the network but the
cable is unplugged (intentionally). I allow it to try connecting. After
a
For number of years, my local mirror has been running approx, without
problems. All of my installs are netinst, using a USB stick.
RLH
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:51:54PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> what would be the easiest way to do an install from my local mirror
> would getting a copy of netinst.iso and modify it be practical
>
As someone else has pointed out, if you just need to install once on one
s
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:51:54PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> what would be the easiest way to do an install from my local mirror
> would getting a copy of netinst.iso and modify it be practical
I typically use the netinstall and unless you set it to be fully
automated i
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Titus Newswanger wrote:
>
> On 7/16/25 14:51, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
>> what would be the easiest way to do an install from my local mirror
>> would getting a copy of netinst.iso and modify it be practical
> for Debian 12 I do a minimal install fr
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 19:51:54 +
fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> what would be the easiest way to do an install from my local mirror
> would getting a copy of netinst.iso and modify it be practical
I'm not sure you mean by "local mirror". If you mean the one close
On 7/16/25 14:51, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
what would be the easiest way to do an install from my local mirror
would getting a copy of netinst.iso and modify it be practical
for Debian 12 I do a minimal install from the unmodified net install iso
without network cable plugged in. After
what would be the easiest way to do an install from my local mirror
would getting a copy of netinst.iso and modify it be practical
>
> I just installed pyspread on my Debian 12 system and when I ran it
> there were two missing packages:-
>
> chris$ pyspread
> Warning: Required module setuptools not found.
> Warning: Required module markdown2 not found.
> chris$
>
> So should this be reported to Debian maintaine
Chris Green wrote:
> I just installed pyspread on my Debian 12 system and when I ran it
> there were two missing packages:-
>
> chris$ pyspread
> Warning: Required module setuptools not found.
> Warning: Required module markdown2 not found.
> chris$
>
> So should this be reported t
I just installed pyspread on my Debian 12 system and when I ran it
there were two missing packages:-
chris$ pyspread
Warning: Required module setuptools not found.
Warning: Required module markdown2 not found.
chris$
So should this be reported to Debian maintainers somewhere or i
ot;foo", "bar", "baz"].
My guess is that it should be a list as it is described in the "SYNTAX"
section of the man page.
Conclusion: there is nothing at all in the environment or arguments
passed to the Post-Invoke script(s) that indicate what has been done.
On Sun 15 Jun 2025 at 13:33:41 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 12:14:30 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Well, I just plagiarised /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99needrestart:
> >
> > $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99redogrub
> > DPkg::Post-Invoke {"test -x /var/local/bin/redo && /var/l
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 12:14:30 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Well, I just plagiarised /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99needrestart:
>
> $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99redogrub
> DPkg::Post-Invoke {"test -x /var/local/bin/redo && /var/local/bin/redo ||
> true"; };
> $
>
> and wrote /var/local/bin/redo
> >
> > 2) I created the script /usr/local/sbin/dpkg-experiment with the following
> > contents:
> >
> > ====
> > #!/bin/sh
> > exec > /var/tmp/dpkg-experiment
> >
"
> if test "$#" != 0; then
> printf :
> printf ' <%s>' "$@"
> fi
> echo; echo
> ps -fp "$$,$PPID"
> echo
> env
>
>
> and gave it 755 permi
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 06:08:08PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> Aaah. I guess they mean Perl-y lists, like ["foo", "bar", "baz"].
Gah, no. That'd make an array ref. I wanted to write ("foo", "bar", "baz").
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec > /var/tmp/dpkg-experiment
> printf '%s args' "$#"
> if test "$#" != 0; then
> printf :
> printf ' <%s>' "$@"
> fi
&
=
> #!/bin/sh
> exec > /var/tmp/dpkg-experiment
> printf '%s args' "$#"
> if test "$#" != 0; then
> printf :
> printf ' <%s>' "$@"
> fi
> echo; echo
> ps -fp "$$,$PPID"
> echo
> env
> ===
"$#"
if test "$#" != 0; then
printf :
printf ' <%s>' "$@"
fi
echo; echo
ps -fp "$$,$PPID"
echo
env
and gave it 755 permissions.
3) I installed a package by running "sudo apt-ge
grub/config changed:
/usr/bin/sh clean_up_grub
```
which certainly would work, but also dances around the issue.
wanderer also brings up issues of changing the packages locally on my
install, which (in my case) is a recipe for pain.
Darac Marjal suggested looking at locally configuring grub, which
On Sun 15 Jun 2025 at 06:23:20 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2025-06-15 at 04:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > OK, here is the screwdriver (from man apt.conf(5)):
> >
> >Pre-Invoke, Post-Invoke
> >This is a list of shell commands to run before/after
> >invoking
l but one drives can fail and the machine will
still boot (to something...). To this end, after I see apt has
updated grub, I manually run something like:
```
sudo update-grub
sudo grub-install /dev/sda
sudo grub-install /dev/sdb
sudo update-grub
```
I'd like to automate this; if grub is changed
On 2025-06-15 at 04:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 09:31:45AM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 7:45 AM Nicholas Geovanis
>> wrote:
>>> You could easily do this with ansible. In perhaps 30 lines of
>>> YAML y
at all but one drives can fail and the machine will
> >> still boot (to something...). To this end, after I see apt has
> >> updated grub, I manually run something like:
> >> ```
> >> sudo update-grub
> >> sudo grub-install /dev/sda
> >> sudo gru
pdated grub, I manually run something like:
>> ```
>> sudo update-grub
>> sudo grub-install /dev/sda
>> sudo grub-install /dev/sdb
>> sudo update-grub
>> ```
>> I'd like to automate this; if grub is changed, run this script automatically.
>
>
> Yo
to *every* drive, with the
> expectation that all but one drives can fail and the machine will
> still boot (to something...). To this end, after I see apt has
> updated grub, I manually run something like:
> ```
> sudo update-grub
> sudo grub-install /dev/sda
> sudo grub-install
will
still boot (to something...). To this end, after I see apt has
updated grub, I manually run something like:
```
sudo update-grub
sudo grub-install /dev/sda
sudo grub-install /dev/sdb
sudo update-grub
```
I'd like to automate this; if grub is changed, run this script automatically.
Thanks k
On 05/06/2025 01:09, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
Unfortunately, Debian text Installer and even Camalares installer do not
cooperate with my UEFI firmware.
I think, installer assumes default use case with loaders for all OSes
installed to the same EFI System Partition.
Create another EFI System
On 6/4/25 11:09, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
Dear advanced users and developers,
Debian is making so big joy to Me that I want to install it to my USB
external SSD harddisk.
Unfortunately, Debian text Installer and even Camalares installer do not
cooperate with my UEFI firmware.
So Grub is being
Dear advanced users and developers,
Debian is making so big joy to Me that I want to install it to my USB
external SSD harddisk.
Unfortunately, Debian text Installer and even Camalares installer do not
cooperate with my UEFI firmware.
So Grub is being always installed automatically to my ATA
mesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
?? No one suggested trying to do bind mounts from inside the chroot.
Clearly that is not going to work. Bind mounts are normally done from
outside before you enter the chroot.
If you want a step by step tutorial on how to install Debian b
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Haines Brown wrote:
I try as you sugggest abd run within chroot. But this is what
I get:?
/# mount -o bind /sys/ /mnt/debinst/sys
mount: /mnt/debinst/sys: mount point does not exist.
dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 06:23:05AM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> the UUIDs are copied and pasted from # blkid and so should be without
> error.
Can you show us the output of blkid?
> I did the chroot command again (while in chroot) nd it reported an error:
chroot from inside a chroot is ob
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 09:30:39PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 21 Apr 2025 at 15:38:45 (-0400), Haines Brown wrote:
> > I am doing a cross install from my current Debian daedalus systm to a
> > target disk /dev/nvme1n1.
> >
> > I enter chroot, and create /etc/
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025, Haines Brown wrote:
I am doing a cross install from my current Debian daedalus systm to a target
disk /dev/nvme1n1.
I enter chroot, and create /etc/festab on the target. I use the UUIDs repored
by # blkid for
the target disk,
Then I attemt to mount these partitions
On Mon 21 Apr 2025 at 15:38:45 (-0400), Haines Brown wrote:
> I am doing a cross install from my current Debian daedalus systm to a target
> disk /dev/nvme1n1.
>
> I enter chroot, and create /etc/festab on the target. I use the UUIDs repored
> by # blkid for
> the target
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:38:45 -0400
Haines Brown wrote:
> I enter chroot, and create /etc/festab on the target. I use the UUIDs
> repored by # blkid for the target disk,
>
> Then I attemt to mount these partitions
>
> /:# mount -a
>
> Mount cann't find the UIIDs. For eample:
>
> mount
I am doing a cross install from my current Debian daedalus systm to a target
disk /dev/nvme1n1.
I enter chroot, and create /etc/festab on the target. I use the UUIDs repored
by # blkid for
the target disk,
Then I attemt to mount these partitions
/:# mount -a
Mount cann't fin
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:48:28 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Marco Möller wrote:
> > I am about to make an installation of Trixie to a Laptop.
> > If it is expected that new install media are to become published
> > soon, hen I wait for testing them, after the current ones are
&g
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 5:56 PM Charles Curley <
charlescur...@charlescurley.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:48:28 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > Marco Möller wrote:
> > > I am about to make an installation of Trixie to a Laptop.
> > > If it is expect
are you aware of:
https://get.debian.org/images/
which offers daily snapshots of the trixie installer?
I just installed the latest weekly build to an AMD64 virtual machine
with no issues, so you should be OK with it on your laptop.
I missed the daily builds. They are obviously what I am inte
Marco Möller wrote:
> I am about to make an installation of Trixie to a Laptop.
> If it is expected that new install media are to become published soon, hen I
> wait for testing them, after the current ones are likely to have been tested
> a lot already.
> Would anybody know ab
I am about to make an installation of Trixie to a Laptop.
If it is expected that new install media are to become published soon,
hen I wait for testing them, after the current ones are likely to have
been tested a lot already.
Would anybody know about when a next version of Trixie installation
, installer isn't fool-proof for me
your advanced technique of booting very old laptop is too complex to me
perhaps trixie is about to become stable, i will install it from scratch
.
> >
> Thank Wright! i have solved it on my own
>
> i am new user of gpt, fatal error is caused by my failure to create efi
> partition
>
Make it simple for yourself. If you are at all unsure when you install,
just take guided partitioning.
That should set up a 512M partit
On Sun 30 Mar 2025 at 11:50:52 (+0800), hlyg wrote:
> i install with debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> during final stage of installation, it fails to install grub
>
> "Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed."
> "This is a fatal error."
>
&g
On 4/1/25 05:20, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Make it simple for yourself. If you are at all unsure when you install,
just take guided partitioning.
That should set up a 512M partition for boot, a 1G partition for swap
and the rest of the disk for /
Unless you *really have* to partition things
Thank Nikulin! i read wiki page you mention, it is too technical, as end
user, i am not expected to worry such details
it seems to me that efi isn't very mature
at present it doesn't offer any benefits to me though it is superior to mbr
On Tue 01 Apr 2025 at 04:09:31 (+0800), hlyg wrote:
> On 3/31/25 10:50, David Wright wrote:
> > Presumably that error message was from the screen. Have you looked
> > at /var/log/installer/syslog for more expansive error messages?
> >
> Thank Wright! i have solved it on my own
>
> i am new user o
On 01/04/2025 03:09, hlyg wrote:
in the end i use mbr, as one of my PCs doesn't support gpt
It depends on firmware, but I expect that UEFI spec describes
requirements for ESP in the case of MBR partitions.
btw what is recommended size of efi partition?
default size is 512M
sgdisk(8)
On 3/31/25 10:50, David Wright wrote:
Presumably that error message was from the screen. Have you looked
at /var/log/installer/syslog for more expansive error messages?
Cheers,
David.
Thank Wright! i have solved it on my own
i am new user of gpt, fatal error is caused by my failure to creat
i install with debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso
during final stage of installation, it fails to install grub
"Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed."
"This is a fatal error."
how to solve it?
i bet it is caused by other bootloader in installation target disk
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:27 AM Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
> Nicolas George writes:
>
> > Barry Newberger (HE12025-03-24):
> >> package: dpkg
> >> version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
> >>
> >> Using Discover update following error occurred:
> >>
> >> Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
> >>
Nicolas George writes:
> Barry Newberger (HE12025-03-24):
>> package: dpkg
>> version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
>>
>> Using Discover update following error occurred:
>>
>> Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
>> installed linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 package post-installation script
1.0-31-amd64.
> > /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
> > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.1.0-31-amd64
> > cpio: write error: No space left on device
> ...
>
> It's not uncommon that one discovers he has let freespace get too low by
> encou
t; cpio: write error: No space left on device
...
It's not uncommon that one discovers he has let freespace get too low by
encountering a failure to install that leaves the new package's contents on disk
taking up valuable space without completing associated setup tasks. One then
logicall
Barry Newberger (HE12025-03-24):
> package: dpkg
> version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
>
> Using Discover update following error occurred:
>
> Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
> installed linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 package post-installation script
> subprocess returned error exit s
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 08:05:32 -0500, Barry Newberger wrote:
> Setting up linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 (6.1.129-1) ...
> /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms:
> dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-32-amd64.
> dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.0-32-amd64.
> /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initram
package: dpkg
version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
Using Discover update following error occurred:
Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
installed linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 package post-installation script
subprocess returned error exit status 1
Ran following:
uname -r
6.1.0-31-amd64
Le 3/3/25 à 16:40, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
gdebi will.
So will apt-get and apt. It's just undocumented.
apt install ./filename.deb
apt-get install ./filename.deb
The pathname
On 03/03/2025 11:49, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Counter Proposal: Ask whomever is providing you the packge, to offer it
as a Debian Repository. That way, your custom application is just a
"extrepo enable " away.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
> > You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...]
>
> dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
> gdebi will.
So will apt-get and apt. It&#x
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial task.
I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple.
So I'd say it depends on the software.
Sometimes you're missing header files,
in which case configure kin
On 3/3/25 15:42, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial
task.
I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple.
So I'd say it depends on the software.
Sometimes you're missing
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...]
dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
gdebi will.
Best,
--
yassine -- sysadm
http://about.me/ychaouche
Looking for side gigs.
configured to
> allow users to use sudo to install packages from configured and trusted
> repositories. If apt can install some random package from a random place
> on the internet, the approach with sudo apt/apt-get is doomed.
> So, please, no.
++. Don't turn Apt into Compose
On 3/3/25 7:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is
empowered to do what you ask.
The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlis
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.
On 3/3/25 6:56 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
This is why I advise people NOT to put the de
On 3/3/25 12:49, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
This is a disaster feature from my point of view. Debian packages are
installed with root privileges, however, many systems are configured to
allow users to use sudo to install packages from configured and trusted
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote:
> I would like this feature in apt-get.
Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is
empowered to do what you ask.
The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlist bug on apt-get
in the Debian bug trac
Le 3/3/25 à 13:14, Richard Owlett a écrit :
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.
Happy now?
Look how angry you made Steven Speek now.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
> > I would like this feature in apt-get.
> >
>
> Exactly *WHAT* feature??
> You supply *NO* context.
This is why I advise people NOT to put the details of their request only
in
Steven Speek wrote:
> I would like this feature in apt-get.
Until then, you can use wget to retrieve the URL and apt install
to install from the filename.
In general, this is rather dangerous, and should probably be
avoided. There may be better solutions, depending on the context
of where th
I would like this feature in apt-get.
On Sun 02 Feb 2025 at 12:14:08 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 10:31:02PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 01 Feb 2025 at 15:29:13 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > I'm not sure this is a bug per se: if what you want is a fully offline
"open", and xdg-open just use some of these options.
> >
> > There's also all the MIME confguration.
>
> Maybe you can see exactly what's going on by examining Epiphany's post install
> script in /var/lib/dpkg/info/.
>
> For firefox-esr, it's
7;s also all the MIME confguration.
Maybe you can see exactly what's going on by examining Epiphany's post install
script in /var/lib/dpkg/info/.
For firefox-esr, it's
#!/bin/sh -e
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] ; then
On 13/02/2025 09:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
I have realized that I do not have an example of an application that
determines https: scheme handler from mailcap (it is
Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
> - *browser alternatives
> - BROWSER
On Wed 12 Feb 2025 at 16:40:24 (+), Chris Green wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
> > > M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
> > >
> > > HP LaserJet M15w (
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Now Debian has*two* completely separate
ways to specify a default application for a role.
I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
particular applications)
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
r-xr-x 1 root root 1290 Jan 14 2023 /usr/bin/sensible-browser*
... it's NOT a symlink to /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser??
hobbit:~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/sensible-browser
sensible-utils: /usr/bin/sensible-browser
Package: sensible-utils
Status: install ok installed
Priority: important
[...]
Ver
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg (HE12025-02-12):
>> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
>
> No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
> avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
> suggestions to uninstall and ran
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
suggestions to uninstall and randomly fiddle with the order are
polluting the go
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> The only way to achieve a reliable result is to understand what is going
> on. I am flabbergasted that so many people on this list do not start
What is going on? You suggested examining the source code. For the end
user, this might be arduous task at best.
On 2025-02-12, David Wright wrote:
>> > >
>> > Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
>> > universal standard. If there was, this thread would've stopped ages
>> > ago.
>>
>> I am really surprised that this thread is so long. However I am still
>> curious whether xf
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
> most direct and easiest solution.
It might achieve the result. A solution…
What will the OP do if they install another browser to try something and
it becomes the default one? Uninstall them a
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
> > M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
> >
> > HP LaserJet M15w (FD27B6) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
> > HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (HP L
On Wed 12 Feb 2025 at 22:54:15 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
> > On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
> > > Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
> > > (XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
> > >
> > Unfort
On 2025-02-12, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
> Greg wrote:
>
> Hello Greg,
>
>>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>>default browser to Vivaldi.
>
> Yes, but as has been explained, there are multiple ways in which a
> browser c
Chris Green wrote:
> Anssi Saari wrote:
> > Chris Green writes:
> >
> > > Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> > > configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
> >
> > Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
> > define
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>default browser to Vivaldi.
Yes, but as has been explained, there are multiple ways in which a
browser can be chosen. Some, most notably, circumventing sys
On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
universal standard.
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
> >> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
> >
> > At worst, the source code is the documentation.
>
> I think Chris had the right idea. Install Epiphan
1 - 100 of 9564 matches
Mail list logo
