Re: insmod tun fails. modprobe tun succeeds.

2003-09-13 Thread Shaul Karl
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 01:33:43 +0200 (CEST), Roberto Sanchez wrote: > No bug, just the behavior of the program. You probably want to stick to > modprobe anyway. Turns out that with the version of insmod that is for kernels 2.5.48 and above, one should either specify the path or use modprobe.

Re: insmod tun fails. modprobe tun succeeds.

2003-09-07 Thread Shaul Karl
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:33:43AM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > > From the modprobe man page: > > Modprobe will automatically load all base modules needed in a module > stack, as described by the dependency file modules.dep. > > Basically, modprobe automatically resolves module dependenci

Re: insmod tun fails. modprobe tun succeeds.

2003-09-06 Thread Roberto Sanchez
--- Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > # insmod tun > Can't open 'tun': No such file or directory > # lsmod |grep tun > # modprobe tun > # lsmod |grep tun > tun 7776 0 > > And /dev/net/tun do exists. > > Am I doing something wrong or is i

insmod tun fails. modprobe tun succeeds.

2003-09-06 Thread Shaul Karl
# insmod tun Can't open 'tun': No such file or directory # lsmod |grep tun # modprobe tun # lsmod |grep tun tun 7776 0 And /dev/net/tun do exists. Am I doing something wrong or is it a bug? -- Shaul Karl,shaulk @ actcom . net . il --