on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:25:20PM -0900, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:17:17PM +0100, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> > sounds interesting to any other newbies, just do the following:
> >
> > $su
> > Password:
> > lynx -source http://go-gnome.com/ | sh
>
>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:17:17PM +0100, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> sounds interesting to any other newbies, just do the following:
>
> $su
> Password:
> lynx -source http://go-gnome.com/ | sh
this is the most horrifying thing i have ever seen suggested. this is
even worse then Microsoft's
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> > Your 2nd suggestion worked OK, but I wonder if it wouldn't be
> > possible to define a new (unused) runlevel that doesn't start X
> > (say 7) and then 'init 7' whenever I feel like shutting down X?
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 06:16:10PM +0200, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> So I guess I have no Linux system now. Scratch everything and try again in a
> month or so.
> Maybe 2.2 will install OK, but I must admit I'm beginning to doubt it. I've
> been trying, on
> and off, to get Linux working for
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:59:51AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> No need to define a new runlevel, just use update-rc.d. Debian sets up
> runlevels 2-5 as identical to each other with the expectation that users who
> want to use them for process/daemon control will customize the runlevels to
>
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> > Your 2nd suggestion worked OK, but I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to
> > define a new
> > (unused) runlevel that doesn't start X (say 7) and then 'init 7' whenever I
> > feel like
> > shutting
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> Your 2nd suggestion worked OK, but I wonder if it wouldn't be possible to
> define a new
> (unused) runlevel that doesn't start X (say 7) and then 'init 7' whenever I
> feel like
> shutting down X? Does this sound possible,
Colin Watson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'm running debian 2.0, and thinking about upgrading to 2.1.
>
> Hmm, you should probably go for 2.2 now, if you can ...
Well, first things first - upgrade 2.0 to 2.2 isn't supported!
> >I want to shut down X, so that I can do some upgrading of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm running debian 2.0, and thinking about upgrading to 2.1.
Hmm, you should probably go for 2.2 now, if you can ...
>I want to shut down X, so that I can do some upgrading of X-related
>stuff, without sawing off the branch I'm standing on, so to speak.
>
>I was advised
I'm running debian 2.0, and thinking about upgrading to 2.1.
I want to shut down X, so that I can do some upgrading of X-related
stuff, without sawing off the branch I'm standing on, so to speak.
I was advised to try 'init 3', but this does nothing. I also tried 'init
0' to check if 'init' does
10 matches
Mail list logo
