-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 07:25:01PM -0200, moises wrote:
> Boa tarde. Alguém sabe informar onde foi parar esses deamons? No
> Mint não achei.
Ha um paquete para inetd: inetutils-inetd e para xinetd: xinetd.
Consulta la lista para Debian en por
Boa tarde. Alguém sabe informar onde foi parar esses deamons? No Mint
não achei.
Valeu
Hello all,
I recently discover the inetd utility and install the openbsd-inetd
package. It works well for starting vsftpd after a few configuration
but it doesn't work for cupsd which give me the message "cupsd: Child
exited with status 2!". Is it possible to start cupsd wit
Nothing in the syslog indicates that the target
system receives a daytime request or a telnet request
from another system and I wonder whether
"inetutils-inetd --debug" might help.
Appears that I might
interactively "inetutils-inetd --debug restart"
or somehow put
please also check here
/etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf
set
net.ipv6.bindv6only = 0
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Monique Y. Mudama
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28 at 12:57, Monique Y. Mudama penned:
>>
>> Apparently, the problem is that inetd has leafnode listening on
>> IPv6
On Wed, Apr 28 at 12:57, Monique Y. Mudama penned:
>
> Apparently, the problem is that inetd has leafnode listening on
> IPv6, but not on IPv4. I think I need to either get slrn to work
> with IPv6, or get leafnode listening on IPv4. Actually I'd like to
> know how to do
ntly, the problem is that inetd has leafnode listening on IPv6,
but not on IPv4. I think I need to either get slrn to work with IPv6,
or get leafnode listening on IPv4. Actually I'd like to know how to do
both. I'd very much appreciate any pointers you can give me.
$ netstat -l |
Chris Jackson wrote:
Looks to me like Debian doesn't have that specific file, as far as I can
make out. It does have a pretty well standard /usr/sbin/inetd in the
package inetutils-inetd, which is started in turn by
/etc/init.d/inetutils-inetd. If it's important to be called t
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
When I execute, this search non of them is actually *exactly*
/etc/init.d/inetd. So no I do not think this was so trivial.
Looks to me like Debian doesn't have that specific file, as far as I can
make out. It does have a pretty well standard /usr/sbin/inetd i
;> Celejar wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0100
>>>> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd ? I am on a debian stable
>>>> system.
>>>>
Malaterre wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd ? I am on a debian stable
>>> system.
>>>
>>> You have a few choices, including openbsd-inetd and xinetd
>>>
>>> In general, you should
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0100
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd ? I am on a debian stable system.
>
> You have a few choices, including openbsd-inetd and xinetd
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Nick Douma wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Celejar wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0100
>> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0100
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd ? I am on a debian stable
> system.
>
> You have a few choices, including op
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0100
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
...
> Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd ? I am on a debian stable system.
You have a few choices, including openbsd-inetd and xinetd
In general, you should install and learn to use 'apt-file&#x
Hi,
I am reading:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s05.html
And it says:
On Debian GNU/Linux, you can run update-inetd --enable bootps, then
/etc/init.d/inetd reload to do so.
Which package provides /etc/init.d/inetd ? I am on a debian stable system.
$ cat /etc
Paul Dufresne wrote:
> 2008/8/30 Thomas Weinbrenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, it is more than just a name. man inetd says:
> "inetd should be run at boot time by /etc/rc (see rc(8)). It then
> listens
> for connections on certain internet sockets.
Forgot to add, if it wasn't clear enough:
man inetd doesn't necessarily have _anything_ to do with
/etc/services, totally depends on which inetd you use and wether your
inetd even cares about information in /etc/services (netstat can use
this information as someone else alread
Hi,
2008/8/30 Paul Dufresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/8/30 Thomas Weinbrenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, it is more than just a name. man inetd says:
It's simply the information that says:
smtp is on port 25
ssh is on port ...
...
nothing more nothing less.
It dep
hat are actually running.
>>
>> Yes, I know. But as I see it, each mapping is like a *possible* door
>> to the Internet.
>
> No, each *port* is like a possible door to the internet. /etc/services
> is just a way to give ports names, regards if those ports are used or
Paul Dufresne wrote:
> Yes, I know. But as I see it, each mapping is like a *possible* door
> to the Internet.
> When there is so much, it become too hard to look at each door to see
> if there is a program behind,
> and if it does what it should.
>
> Taken from http://en.wik
Paul Dufresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> From: Paul Dufresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Looking to /etc/services, I found that Debian seems to like to have a
>>> very big file with all known services rather than just add the
>>> services needed. I don't even knows if other distributions does just
> From: Paul Dufresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For myself, rkhunter give warning about inetd.
>> Looking to /etc/services, I found that Debian seems to like to have a
>> very big file with all known services rather than just add the
>> services needed. I don't
If the file "/etc/inetd.conf" contains only comment or empty lines, with
the package "openbsd-inetd" installed inetd is not started at boot-up.
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11.09.06 19:51, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> But I wonder why netbase depends on inetd.
because many packages depending on netbase depends on it because of inetd
(inetd was some time ago in netbase). See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=154441;archive=yes
However they imho sho
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS: Funnily enough `apt-get remove openbsd-inetd' says that a whole bunch of
> packages depend on it:
> Looks like bugs in the dependencies in `testing'.
I don't think they depend directly on inetd. It seems netbase d
Please look at
#385320: Users of xinetd can't remove openbsd-inetd
Bye,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
I would say that the choice between the two is defined not by how
'professional' your host is, but rather by the hostility of the
networking environment. Xinetd can limit the number
has a more
> extensive logging. There are other improvements over inetd (see xinetd
> faq [0], for example, or this article [1]). So, if your network is not
> well protected, you may want to replace inetd with xinetd (and don't
> forget to configure it properly :))
> [0]
On 9/8/06, Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also for a
professional setup. xinetd is far more featured, though, and it's been
the default for Red Hat systems for years.
I would say that the choice between
T escribe:
> On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:12:48 +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
>
> >> ...I'd like to know whether
> >> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
> >
> > inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also f
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:12:48 +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
>> ...I'd like to know whether
>> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
>
> inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also for a
> professional setup.
Thanks Ism
> > On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:56, T wrote:
> > > Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know
> > > whether inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
I prefer xinetd anywhere. IT's better configurable, even if so
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:58:49 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:56, T wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know
> > whether inetd or xinetd is preferred for a
T escribe:
> Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know whether
> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
inetd is more than ok for a personal environment, why not also for a
professional setup. xinetd is far more featured, though, a
On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:56, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know whether
> inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
I like openbsd-inetd because it's straightforward, lightweight and got the
O
T:
>
> # /etc/init.d/inetd has been diverted by the xinetd package.
> # The inetd service is provided by xinetd, which means inetd
> # doesn't need to be run.
> #
> # See /etc/init.d/xinetd, or /etc/init.d/inetd.real.
>
> exit 0
> -
Hi
Hope I'm not starting a religious war here, but I'd like to know whether
inetd or xinetd is preferred for a *personal environment*.
In my current system:
$ cat /etc/init.d/inetd
#!/bin/sh
# /etc/init.d/inetd has been diverted by the xinetd pack
John L Fjellstad wrote:
> Dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I know inetd forwards a programms (servers) stdout to the client... but
>>where does it forward the requests from a client to? It's not stdin..
>>
>>
>>It there any simple exampl
John L Fjellstad wrote:
> Dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I know inetd forwards a programms (servers) stdout to the client... but
>>where does it forward the requests from a client to? It's not stdin..
>>
>>
>>It there any simple exampl
Dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know inetd forwards a programms (servers) stdout to the client... but
> where does it forward the requests from a client to? It's not stdin..
>
>
> It there any simple example server available that was written to work
> with in
My understanding is that it depends upon the type of connection. A dgram
("nowait") server is spawned separately and the socket is passed, while a
wait server is passed stdin, stdout, and stderr and managed through inetd.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbo
I know inetd forwards a programms (servers) stdout to the client... but
where does it forward the requests from a client to? It's not stdin..
It there any simple example server available that was written to work
with inetd?
Dirk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
I know inetd forwards a programms (servers) stdout to the client... but
where does it forward the requests from a client to? It's not stdin..
It there any simple example server available that was written to work
with inetd?
Dirk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On 2006-04-26, Steve Lamb penned:
>
> Yeah, knew that but was doing 3 things at once. Lemme just say
> never play MMORPG and admin at the same time. :D
For several years, that would have effectively prevented me from
admin'ing =P
(But I'm feeling much better now ...)
--
monique
Help
Greg Folkert wrote:
> update-rc.d -f ssh remove
Not true, that's the first thing I tried and none of the links were
removed. :/
Oh, wait, maybe the -f makes a world of difference. *blush*
> Never logout of said machine completely until you can login back in
Yeah, knew that
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 14:58 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Joey Hess wrote:
> >> Many embedded systems don't have swap. ssh in inetd worked ok last time
> >> I used it as long as speed was not important.
>
> > Thanks, Joey, I'll
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Many embedded systems don't have swap. ssh in inetd worked ok last time
>> I used it as long as speed was not important.
> Thanks, Joey, I'll give it a whirl later on and let everyone know. Was
> just hoping that it was
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 13:59 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> ssh stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sshd
>> For the record, -i at the end.
> Sort of why I put the comment:
> Now, since I have not tested this at all... it should really
>
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 13:59 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Why would one want sshd to run from inetd?
>
> Machine with low RAM that I rarely access via ssh. I do need access from
> time to time via ssh however. 500k of a resident ssh is 500k I could f
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 13:59 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Why would one want sshd to run from inetd?
>
> Machine with low RAM that I rarely access via ssh. I do need access from
> time to time via ssh however. 500k of a resident ssh is 500k I could f
At 1146000792 past the epoch, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ah, thanks. It's a 96 from unixshell.com. Trying to fit exim,
> apache(-ssl), SA, clamav all in 96Mb is rough. :(
I have 80MB RAM and I've given up running spamassassin. I quite
comfortably run exim4, crm114, apache, ssh, bind, a popd, an im
Joey Hess wrote:
> Many embedded systems don't have swap. ssh in inetd worked ok last time
> I used it as long as speed was not important.
Thanks, Joey, I'll give it a whirl later on and let everyone know. Was
just hoping that it was a question on dpkg-reconfigure th
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> If a process is unused for any length the time it will get swapped out
> and will use very little, if any, real memory until it's woken up.
Limited swap as well. I just rather it be well and gone and only
loaded when required.
--
Steve C. Lamb | B
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> It generates the host-specific keys at install time, but the v1 ssh
> protocol requires a second smaller RSA key generated that's not used for
> more than an hour, whereas the v2 protocol uses Diffie-Hellman.
Ah, thanks for the explination!
--
Steve C.
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> Depending on how RAM limited the system is, you might also take a look
> at dropbear; it's a lightweight ssh server available in Debian.
Ah, thanks. It's a 96 from unixshell.com. Trying to fit exim,
apache(-ssl), SA, clamav all in 96Mb is rough. :(
--
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:59:10PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Machine with low RAM that I rarely access via ssh. I do need access from
> time to time via ssh however.
Depending on how RAM limited the system is, you might also take a look
at dropbear; it's a lightweight ssh server available i
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> If a process is unused for any length the time it will get swapped out
> and will use very little, if any, real memory until it's woken up.
Many embedded systems don't have swap. ssh in inetd worked ok last time
I used it as long as speed was not importa
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Uh, does this seem right? I recall sshd generating the key when it is
> first installed and don't recall the key changing every reboot which is when
> sshd would shutdown/startup like it would from inetd. :/
It gene
On 2006-04-25, Steve Lamb penned:
>
> Uh, does this seem right? I recall sshd generating the key when
> it is first installed and don't recall the key changing every
> reboot which is when sshd would shutdown/startup like it would
> from inetd. :/
It seems l
Steve Lamb wrote:
Machine with low RAM that I rarely access via ssh. I do need access from
time to time via ssh however. 500k of a resident ssh is 500k I could free up
by moving it to inetd.
If a process is unused for any length the time it will get swapped out
and will use very little
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> -i Specifies that sshd is being run from inetd(8). sshd is normally
> not run from inetd because it needs to generate the server key
> before it can respond to the client, and this may take tens of
> seco
Greg Folkert wrote:
> Why would one want sshd to run from inetd?
Machine with low RAM that I rarely access via ssh. I do need access from
time to time via ssh however. 500k of a resident ssh is 500k I could free up
by moving it to inetd.
> ssh stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbi
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:45 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Is there some automated method of placing sshd into inetd? I've attempted
> to dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server to no avail.
Why would one want sshd to run from inetd?
sshd should typically be run as a daemon.
As far as I
On 2006-04-25, Steve Lamb penned:
>
> Is there some automated method of placing sshd into inetd? I've atte=
> mpted
> to dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server to no avail.
I don't know about automated, but I found this warning in `man sshd`:
-i Specifies that
Steve Lamb wrote:
Is there some automated method of placing sshd into inetd? I've attempted
to dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server to no avail.
You almost certainly don't want to run sshd from inetd. Bad idea.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam &a
Is there some automated method of placing sshd into inetd? I've attempted
to dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server to no avail.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream
description available)
after modifying inetd.conf, nothing is listening to port 79
Thanks,
Vadim
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Quoting Vadim Kutsyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For some reason I have inetd listening to port 79 (finger). Are
there any reason why it should be listening to p
Quoting Vadim Kutsyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For some reason I have inetd listening to port 79 (finger). Are
there any reason why it should be listening to port 79?
#lsof | grep finger
inetd 11048 root4u IPv4 827103602 TCP
*:finger (LISTEN)
Thanks,
For some reason I have inetd listening to port 79 (finger). Are there
any reason why it should be listening to port 79?
#lsof | grep finger
inetd 11048 root4u IPv4 827103602 TCP
*:finger (LISTEN)
Thanks,
Vadim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply put... being the relative newbie that I am, is there an
> advantage to
> having the xinetd package rather than netkit-inetd? Currently, I have
>
> netkit-inetd installed. Would I be better off removing it and
&
Rick Friedman wrote:
> Simply put... being the relative newbie that I am, is there an advantage to
> having the xinetd package rather than netkit-inetd? Currently, I have
> netkit-inetd installed. Would I be better off removing it and installing
> xinetd?
That depends solely o
Simply put... being the relative newbie that I am, is there an advantage to
having the xinetd package rather than netkit-inetd? Currently, I have
netkit-inetd installed. Would I be better off removing it and installing
xinetd?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Rick
--
Rick's Law:
Hi!
I'm wondering what's the difference between the netkit-inetd and
inetutil-inetd packages...
Debian (sarge) installs netkit-inetd by default, but if one does a
"apt-get install inetd", inetutils-inetd is proposed for installation
instead.
The descriptions for both p
Hi David,
> "Sep 15 16:07:08 Cobb028933918A-Tux inetd[8465]: cvspserver/tcp: bind:
> Address already in use"
Can't think of so much else: is cvs-pserver running independent from
inetd?
Otherwise, try something like "netstat -t -l -p --numeric-ports", and check
Every few minutes, my syslog gets a message such as:
"Sep 15 16:07:08 Cobb028933918A-Tux inetd[8465]: cvspserver/tcp: bind:
Address already in use"
I googled around. Such a thing was reported back in 2000. At the time,
the answer was "You have two copies of inetd running. Ho
netstat -anp will say you the proccess that is listening.
If inetd is the proccess you must edit /etc/inetd.conf
If xinetd is the proccess you must go to /etc/xinetd.d and edit the
file for the telnet service (put disable=yes).
On 8/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
I recently installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 on an HP Pavilion 310n. The problem
I'm having is that inetd is spawning the telnet service. When I scan the ports
on my computer, port 23 is actively listening for telnet connections. I have
tried many things in order to close this port. I
As per subject line I'm a new user (OK knoppix hd install) trying to
enable ftp for some local file transfer. tried update-inetd --enable ftp
which changed the file but netstat doesn't show it listening. Further
exploration showed inetd not running. Started it. disabled ftp then
enable
h. Is there a way for changes in
> inetd.conf to be enacted without the need to take the machine
> down and up again?
Reading the manual is useful for this sort of thing.
stax:~-526> man inetd
Reformatting inetd(8), please wait...
INETD(8) BSD System Manage
trying kill -HUP
you can find the pid of the inetd by running ps -aux | grep -i inetd
hth
-stephen
On 29 Jun 2004 12:23:22 +0100, Keith O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just had to edit the /etc/inetd.conf file. In order for the
>
d to be rebooted.
>>
>> Is this the wrong approach. Is there a way for changes in
>> inetd.conf to be enacted without the need to take the machine
>> down and up again?
>>
RA> /etc/init.d/inetd restart
That was actually the first thing I tried
>>
>> Is this the wrong approach. Is there a way for changes in
>> inetd.conf to be enacted without the need to take the machine
>> down and up again?
>>
RA> /etc/init.d/inetd restart
That was actually the first thing I tried, but
Keith O'Connell wrote:
Hi,
I just had to edit the /etc/inetd.conf file. In order for the
changes to take effect the machine had to be rebooted.
No it didn't:
Dolphin:~# /etc/init.d/inetd reload
Dolphin:~#
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTEC
; inetd.conf to be enacted without the need to take the machine
> down and up again?
>
/etc/init.d/inetd restart
--
Ronny Aasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I just had to edit the /etc/inetd.conf file. In order for the
changes to take effect the machine had to be rebooted.
Is this the wrong approach. Is there a way for changes in
inetd.conf to be enacted without the need to take the machine
down and up agai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Trying to start a Perl smtp(port 25) server from inetd.
> Script works OK as stand alone but fails to start from inetd.
Hopefully it has been designed to be run from inetd.
> Question 1: Is there a way to log inetd?
Information and errors is logged via syslo
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:20:05 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to start a Perl smtp(port 25) server from inetd.
> Failed to start server :Address already in use
> (in cleanup) Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at
> /us
Trying to start a Perl smtp(port 25) server from inetd.
Script works OK as stand alone but fails to start from inetd.
(In fact this has reached you through the same code, but running on a
different port)
Question 1: Is there a way to log inetd?
Question 2: should the server be started
[Rob Weir]
> apt-proxy is a shell script, and thus cannot run as a daemon.
Well, you could hack something together with netcat, but that has about
as much point as using a screwdriver as a chisel. inetd is the right
tool for the job.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 02:05:14PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:54 AM
> >Subject: Re: apt-proxy without i
>- Original Message -
>From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:54 AM
>Subject: Re: apt-proxy without inetd
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
> I'm not us
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:34:48PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
> I'm not using inetd or xinetd and would like to keep it that way.
Why? Just install it and disable everything aside from apt-proxy.
--
Rob Weir
Hi,
is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
I'm not using inetd or xinetd and would like to keep it that way.
The depends field says you only need tcpd but i don't think
running tcpd without inetd is possible/useful?
On a related note, i remember that i wanted to remove inetd wh
ients
communicating with the Xvnc server, which sent data to xvncviewer in
(possibly) the same machine, and then sending it to another Xvnc server that
was created from the inetd connection and then finally going out over the
network to my client. As you can see not very effecient.
Anyway, I'
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 00:31, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:45:22AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > I really don't see what the OP's problem is... the vncserver package comes
> > with documentation on how to set it up through inetd to provide an xdm
> &g
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:45:22AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> I really don't see what the OP's problem is... the vncserver package comes
> with documentation on how to set it up through inetd to provide an xdm
> chooser on connect via XDMCP. I have it configured so on all t
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:09:32AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
> >Is there a way to do this with one port and inetd, or will I have to use
> >several ports, and tell my users which port is theirs (and start desktops
> >for 50 users from init.d).
>
>
Mike Fedyk wrote:
Is there a way to do this with one port and inetd, or will I have to use
several ports, and tell my users which port is theirs (and start desktops
for 50 users from init.d).
I don't think there is. This sounds more the domain of... Crap, can't
remember the name.
do this with one port and inetd, or will I have to use
several ports, and tell my users which port is theirs (and start desktops
for 50 users from init.d).
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * Initech ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031212 13:42]:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 01:20:42PM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> > > I've heard that the inetd process is not very secure.
>
> That's not necessarily true. What is "not very sec
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
