On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:24:54 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 28/09/11 21:25, � wrote:
(...)
Ah, Scott, Scott... the web turns into a lonely place when you can't
play "Angry Birds" online and you need an html5 based browser to
launch those softy balls of feather to des
On 28/09/11 21:25, � wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:45:22 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 28/09/11 00:49, � wrote:
>
> (...)
>
What changes in the internet render the default Squeeze Iceweasel
unusable other than the latest extensions? We're a long way from HTML5
yet.
>
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:45:22 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 28/09/11 00:49, � wrote:
(...)
>>> What changes in the internet render the default Squeeze Iceweasel
>>> unusable other than the latest extensions? We're a long way from HTML5
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> NOTE: warning from webservers based on
On 28/09/11 13:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> MC 900 Ft Jesus - TRUTH IS OUT OF STYLE (1989)
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYtlpG0hb38
>
> Cheers!
>
> Ralf
>
>
5!
I meant 5
On a slightly more serious note - HTML *5* is not a standard, yet. I'll
happily start coding for it when it is - unti
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 05:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > just like lots of people believe in
> > little green people in flying saucers
>
> Idiots, everybody knows that the aliens are grey and that they fly in
> cigar formed spaceships.
>
> Which reminds me to two songs.
>
> Jim
On 28/09/11 13:14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> just like lots of people believe in
>> little green people in flying saucers
>
> Idiots, everybody knows that the aliens are grey and that they fly in
> cigar formed spaceships.
:-D
They make the spaceships in cigars? I knew those toba
> just like lots of people believe in
> little green people in flying saucers
Idiots, everybody knows that the aliens are grey and that they fly in
cigar formed spaceships.
Which reminds me to two songs.
Jimi Hendrix - UFO (AUTHENTIC STUDIO RECORDINGS VOL 3)
http://www.youtube.c
On 28/09/11 00:49, � wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:45:28 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 26/09/11 04:51, Allan Wind wrote:
>>> On 2011-09-25 17:56:32, Brian wrote:
The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness
because there is a later version out.
>>>
>>> The envir
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Rob Hurle wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum
> wrote:
> > I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the
> > debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about
> setting
> > that up?
>
> T
On Tue 27 Sep 2011 at 11:42:17 +, Camaleón wrote:
> So, do you still think that Iceweasel does not fit for point 1)?
There might be a demand to get it in on that basis - but it would only
be for the birds. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:45:28 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 26/09/11 04:51, Allan Wind wrote:
>> On 2011-09-25 17:56:32, Brian wrote:
>>> The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because
>>> there is a later version out.
>>
>> The environment changes relative to a frozen br
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:43:08 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 14:23:12 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:33:31 +0100, Brian wrote:
>>
>> > It is clear we have diametrically opposite views, so best leave it
>> > there.
>>
>> How can be that?
>>
>> I mean, how can you
On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 14:23:12 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:33:31 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> > It is clear we have diametrically opposite views, so best leave it
> > there.
>
> How can be that?
>
> I mean, how can you consider ClamAV needs to be up-to-date (I mean the
> progra
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:33:31 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 11:35:51 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Hey, you can't auto-give you a point for something that I have not
>> discussed ;-)
>
> You were being tardy in getting round to it so it needed something to
> prod you into action. :)
On Mon 26 Sep 2011 at 11:35:51 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Hey, you can't auto-give you a point for something that I have not
> discussed ;-)
You were being tardy in getting round to it so it needed something to
prod you into action. :)
> Regards to the 4th point that says "a package needs to be
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:16:04 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 20:02:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I think that's not comparable with a browser functionality that is
>> needed for almost 50% of today's most used sites... how many people
>> uses sort every day and how many people uses I
On 26/09/11 04:51, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2011-09-25 17:56:32, Brian wrote:
>> The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness
>> because there is a later version out.
>
> The environment changes relative to a frozen browser which reduce
> the usefulness to me.
?
What changes in th
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 20:02:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I think that's not comparable with a browser functionality that is needed
> for almost 50% of today's most used sites... how many people uses sort
> every day and how many people uses Iceweasel every day? :-)
I wasn't comparing sort's func
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:06:11 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 17:35:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:56:32 +0100, Brian wrote:
>>
>> > The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because
>> > there is a later version out.
>>
>> Yes, they do.
>>
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 17:35:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:56:32 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> > The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because
> > there is a later version out.
>
> Yes, they do.
>
> Many sites out there require fancy things like html5. And
On 2011-09-25 17:56:32, Brian wrote:
> The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because
> there is a later version out.
The environment changes relative to a frozen browser which reduce
the usefulness to me.
Google Apps was mentioned earlier which used to work and now give
y
Ah, that webpage did the trick, thanks!
-PT
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Peter Tenenbaum <
peter.g.tenenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the
> debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about setting
> that up?
>
>
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:56:32 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 15:44:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Yes, I already read that announcement message and that's why I find it
>> very appropriate, specially for points 1) and 4).
>
> The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulne
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 15:44:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Yes, I already read that announcement message and that's why I find it
> very appropriate, specially for points 1) and 4).
The squeeze version of Iceweasel doesn't lose its usefulness because
there is a later version out. The later version
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 22:56:21 +0800, lina wrote:
>
> > I added the
> >
> > deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release
> > to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/:
> >
> > during updating, it showed me:
> >
> > W: GPG error: http://mozi
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:13:26 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 13:45:42 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I've always wondered why Mozilla products are not integrated into
>> "squeeze-updates" (the old "volatile" repo), it seems to fit perfectly
>> there :-?
>
> Not quite the perfect fit for
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 22:56:21 +0800, lina wrote:
> I added the
>
> deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release
> to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/:
>
> during updating, it showed me:
>
> W: GPG error: http://mozilla.debian.net squeeze-backports Release: The
> following signatu
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:56:21 +0800
lina wrote:
Hello lina,
> W: GPG error: http://mozilla.debian.net squeeze-backports Release: The
> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> available: NO_PUBKEY 85A3D26506C4AE2A
Add the key: There's a series of instructions on
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 13:45:42 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I've always wondered why Mozilla products are not integrated into
> "squeeze-updates" (the old "volatile" repo), it seems to fit perfectly
> there :-?
Not quite the perfect fit for inclusion as you might think:
This suite will contain
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:45:42PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Hi,
> I've always wondered why Mozilla products are not integrated into
> "squeeze-updates" (the old "volatile" repo), it seems to fit perfectly
> there :-?
As far as I remember in the past new Firefox/Iceweasel releases did
not always
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:02:34 +1000, Rob Hurle wrote:
>
> > Dear Peter,
> >
> > On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum
> > wrote:
> >> I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the
> >> debian iceweasel distribution
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:02:34 +1000, Rob Hurle wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum
> wrote:
>> I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the
>> debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about
>> setting that up?
>
> Tr
Dear Peter,
On 25 September 2011 10:04, Peter Tenenbaum wrote:
> I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the
> debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about setting
> that up?
Try the following:
http://mozilla.debian.net/
I used it and found it
I would like to migrate to firefox 6.0, but I'd like to do it using the
debian iceweasel distribution. Can anyone tell me how to go about setting
that up?
Thanks in advance,
-PT
34 matches
Mail list logo
