Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-30 Thread Derek \"The Monkey\" Wueppelmann
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:04, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > Check the permissions on /dev/dri/card0 (or similar). You should have > one of these two blocks in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 as described here: > http://www.xfree86.org/4.3.0/DRI6.html#10 > > # All users get full access > Section "DRI" >

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-30 Thread Derek \"The Monkey\" Wueppelmann
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 12:09, hacker wrote: > Not sure then. I know I ran out of ram (192 MB here) on some games, > but tuxracer and chromium were ok. Also, when running lots of > windows, the glxgears sometimes jumped up to 1000+ fps (it seemed like > the more load I put on the higher it was able

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-27 Thread Jonathan Brandmeyer
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 09:37 -0400, Derek "The Monkey" Wueppelmann wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:13, hacker wrote: > > I don't know all the particulars of glxinfo, but if gears is 300, you > > probably have it. The proof is in the use .. try running tuxracer or > > chromium and see if they work

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-27 Thread hacker
On 5/27/05, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:13, hacker wrote: > > I don't know all the particulars of glxinfo, but if gears is 300, you > > probably have it. The proof is in the use .. try running tuxracer or > > chromium and see if they work. Fo

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-27 Thread Derek \"The Monkey\" Wueppelmann
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:13, hacker wrote: > I don't know all the particulars of glxinfo, but if gears is 300, you > probably have it. The proof is in the use .. try running tuxracer or > chromium and see if they work. For me, the die when I'm not > accelerated. Hmm, so glxgears says it has a hi

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-26 Thread hacker
On 5/26/05, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:55, hacker wrote: > > My i810 will only work on 16 bit depth, so maybe your in another > > depth. Also, try glxgears to test it .. should be about 100 fps > > normally and 300+ when accelerated. > > Yup

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-26 Thread Derek \"The Monkey\" Wueppelmann
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:55, hacker wrote: > My i810 will only work on 16 bit depth, so maybe your in another > depth. Also, try glxgears to test it .. should be about 100 fps > normally and 300+ when accelerated. Yup, I'm in 16 bit depth. I've verified this using xdpyinfo. I do get 300+ FPS on g

Re: i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-26 Thread hacker
On 5/26/05, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I've been trying to get my i810 card to enable direct rendering. I > have it so now when X starts up it says that Direct Rendering is > enabled, however glxinfo says that it is not enabled. Any suggestions? I > can post both t

i810 and Direct Rendering X11

2005-05-26 Thread Derek \"The Monkey\" Wueppelmann
So I've been trying to get my i810 card to enable direct rendering. I have it so now when X starts up it says that Direct Rendering is enabled, however glxinfo says that it is not enabled. Any suggestions? I can post both the output of glxinfo and the log from the startup of XFree. -- o) De