On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:34:48 + Vincent mentioned this:
Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero
requires gvfs).
> If you open /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook and take a look at the first
> few lines, it says that the file is auto-generated (which is the
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Charlie wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:47:43 +1000 Charlie sent:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this:
>> Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
>> gvfs).
>>
>> &
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:47:43 +1000 Charlie sent:
>
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this:
> Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
> gvfs).
>
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie
> > wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this:
Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
gvfs).
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this:
> >
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this:
> Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
> gvfs).
>
>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie
>> wrote:
>> >
>&
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this:
Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
gvfs).
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this:
> >
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this:
> Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
> gvfs).
>
>>
>> >> Steve Litt writes:
>> >>
>> >> Becau
Charlie writes:
>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this:
>>
>> Please check out [1] --- let me know if it works for you and how you
>> like it.
>>
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/lee-/fvwm
>
>Hello Lee,
>
> I've just had a cursory read and you have put a lot of effo
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this:
Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires
gvfs).
>
> >> Steve Litt writes:
> >>
> >> Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some
> >> documentation o
>> Steve Litt writes:
>>
>> Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some
>> documentation on it.
Please check out [1] --- let me know if it works for you and how you
like it.
[1]: https://github.com/lee-/fvwm
--
Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power.
--
To
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:40:21 +0200 lee sent:
> These two functions are described in the man page.
>
> BTW, either IconMan or IconBox are deprecated --- I don't remember
> which one.
Thanks Lee,
It was ButtonBar for laptop. I removed that entry in my menudefs.hook
and it is gone, no longer a wor
Charlie writes:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent:
>
>> Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what
>> things?
>
> Lee,
>
> If I can jump in here re: fvwm. [fvwm 2.6.5] On my desktop I have this
> thing. I has two columns of squares which are labelled FileMGR - xv
> -gview an
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent:
> Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what
> things?
Sorry for the noise Lee. I found what the thing was called. It was a
laptop ButtonBar and I got rid of it.
So it's done.
Thanks for your help,
Charlie
--
Registered Linux User:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent:
> Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what
> things?
Lee,
If I can jump in here re: fvwm. [fvwm 2.6.5] On my desktop I have this
thing. I has two columns of squares which are labelled FileMGR - xv
-gview and all sorts of things.
To write
Steve Litt writes:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more
>> flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to
>> arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even
>> wastes less
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200
lee wrote:
> So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more
> flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to
> arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even
> wastes less screen space than i3 because I
lee wrote at 2014-09-21 10:48 -0500:
> With fvwm, I can have sticky floating windows that stay on top. This
> allows me to watch the movie, no matter to which desktop I switch, and
> no other window will come up above the movie, so I can always watch it.
>
> Moreover, fvwm is somewhat capable of
green writes:
> lee wrote at 2014-09-20 13:34 -0500:
>> There's also i3, if you can live with a tiling WM that doesn't support
>> sticky floating windows yet.
>
> I enjoy using i3. What is this "sticky floating windows" feature that
> I am missing? After searching, it seems to be almost the sam
lee wrote at 2014-09-20 13:34 -0500:
> There's also i3, if you can live with a tiling WM that doesn't support
> sticky floating windows yet.
I enjoy using i3. What is this "sticky floating windows" feature that
I am missing? After searching, it seems to be almost the same as i3's
"scratchpad" fe
19 matches
Mail list logo
