> To make *my* matters worse, my card (a vanilla Realted-8139
> based PCMCIA card, whose manufacturer has not even included
> its name on the package) is not supported with the standard
> pcmcia-cs package. On the other hand, recompiling a new 2.4.9
> stock kernel with in-kernel PCMCIA support
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, exactly that bug. The problem is that the modules are not
> present in the /target/lib/modules/2.2.19/pcmcia directory (in
> fact, there is no pcmcia directory). I had been bitten by this
> bug and I saw at least one more per
On Aug 18 2001, Greg Wiley wrote:
> On Saturday, August 18, 2001 12:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > BTW, which bug did you discover? Any problems with
> > PCMCIA hardware installation?
>
> Yep. The running log on one of the consoles claims that some files
> or a directory are missing. I'll r
On Saturday, August 18, 2001 12:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I would like to report a bug on the install disks
>> for the "testing" [...]
> BTW, which bug did you discover? Any problems with
> PCMCIA hardware installation?
Yep. The running log on one of the consoles claims
that some files
#include
Greg Wiley wrote on Fri Aug 17, 2001 um 11:56:27PM:
> I would like to report a bug on
> the install disks for the "testing"
> distribution. My inclination is
> to file against "installation" but
> I am not sure. How does one
> report a possible defect in the
> installation disks?
A com
On Aug 17 2001, Greg Wiley wrote:
> I would like to report a bug on the install disks for the "testing"
> distribution. My inclination is to file against "installation" but
> I am not sure. How does one report a possible defect in the
> installation disks?
I think that you should file a
I would like to report a bug on
the install disks for the "testing"
distribution. My inclination is
to file against "installation" but
I am not sure. How does one
report a possible defect in the
installation disks?
Thanks,
-=greg
7 matches
Mail list logo
