Am 2007-04-02 18:18:07, schrieb Jeff Zhang:
> If you just want to convert txt into ps then pdf, u2ps from gnome-u2ps will
> produce better pdf quality with correct embeded font.
But can this run on a server which produce over 4000 PDF-Pages
per day? I mean in a working day of around 8-10 hours no
Jeff Zhang wrote:
> [Try it] with simple unicode encoding file (test.txt), like:
> chinese 中文
> then produce with:
> u2ps -X utf8 --gpfamily="Sans 12" test.txt -o u2ps.ps
> paps --font "Sans 12" < test.txt >paps.ps
It must have something to do with installed fonts. I repeated your
experiments
On 4/2/07, Jan Willem Stumpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Zhang wrote:
> If you just want to convert txt into ps then pdf, u2ps from
> gnome-u2ps will produce better pdf quality with correct embeded
> font.
I am sorry, I do not agree. Compared to paps, u2ps is a very poor
program indeed.
Jeff Zhang wrote:
> If you just want to convert txt into ps then pdf, u2ps from
> gnome-u2ps will produce better pdf quality with correct embeded
> font.
I am sorry, I do not agree. Compared to paps, u2ps is a very poor
program indeed.
- u2ps, unasked, adds a frame around the text and a header.
On 4/2/07, JWS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-03-16 18:03:22, schrieb Jan Willem Stumpel:
>> paps [font options] < test.txt > test.ps.
> This is PERFECTLY what I was serching for my Server...
Note that the format of the "font options" in paps has changed
betwe
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-03-16 18:03:22, schrieb Jan Willem Stumpel:
>> paps [font options] < test.txt > test.ps.
> This is PERFECTLY what I was serching for my Server...
Note that the format of the "font options" in paps has changed
between versions 0.6.6 (Etch) and 0.6.7 (Sid). IMH
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> Am 2007-03-16 18:03:22, schrieb Jan Willem Stumpel:
> > This will work if you have a Unicode-aware TeX, but why so
> > complicated? paps (apt-get install paps, in Etch since April last
> > year) just allows you to s
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:07:25PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Am 2007-03-16 10:22:16, schrieb Douglas Allan Tutty:
> > Have you tried LaTex? Sure a .tex file starts with a preamble but you
> > could have two files head.tex (preamble) and tail.tex (nd{document}).
> > Then cat h
Hello Jan,
Am 2007-03-16 18:03:22, schrieb Jan Willem Stumpel:
> This will work if you have a Unicode-aware TeX, but why so
> complicated? paps (apt-get install paps, in Etch since April last
> year) just allows you to say
>
> paps [font options] < test.txt > test.ps.
>
> If you put paps into
Hi Doug,
Am 2007-03-16 10:22:16, schrieb Douglas Allan Tutty:
> Have you tried LaTex? Sure a .tex file starts with a preamble but you
> could have two files head.tex (preamble) and tail.tex (nd{document}).
> Then cat head.tex file.txt tail.tex > file.tex, then latex file.tex then
> dvips file.dv
Am 2007-03-15 23:34:47, schrieb H.S.:
> Interesting, kwrite worked. Gedit, however, did not. The result in that
> case was the same as in u2ps, along with the same gnomeprint warning.
>
> So, looks like I have to fire up kwrite just to print a simple text file
> to a postscript file.
And what d
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Have you tried LaTex? Sure a .tex file starts with a preamble
but you could have two files head.tex (preamble) and tail.tex
(\end{document}). Then cat head.tex file.txt tail.tex >
file.tex, then latex file.tex then dvips file.dvi. Then yo
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:34:47PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
I use kde. Konqueror(kwite)->file->print->print to file(ps) ,this is
my way. Gnome should also print it to file. Have a try?
Interesting, kwrite worked. Gedit, however, did not. The result in that
case was the
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Have you tried LaTex? Sure a .tex file starts with a preamble
> but you could have two files head.tex (preamble) and tail.tex
> (\end{document}). Then cat head.tex file.txt tail.tex >
> file.tex, then latex file.tex then dvips file.dvi. Then you
> have your file.ps
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:34:47PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
> >I use kde. Konqueror(kwite)->file->print->print to file(ps) ,this is
> >my way. Gnome should also print it to file. Have a try?
> >
>
> Interesting, kwrite worked. Gedit, however, did not. The result in that
> case was the same as in u2p
H.S. wrote:
> I am trying to print a text file containing different languages
> characters, in utf8 encoding, to a ps file. a2ps gives weird
> characters in the non-english character's place. Then I
> discovered u2ps, but it gives boxes instead with some messages
> given by the u2ps command:
T
li sh wrote:
2007/3/16, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I am trying to print a text file containing different languages
characters, in utf8 encoding, to a ps file. a2ps gives weird characters
in the non-english character's place.
I encountered a2ps's embarrassment,too.
So, does anyone know
2007/3/16, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I am trying to print a text file containing different languages
characters, in utf8 encoding, to a ps file. a2ps gives weird characters
in the non-english character's place.
I encountered a2ps's embarrassment,too.
So, does anyone know what is the s
Hello,
I am trying to print a text file containing different languages
characters, in utf8 encoding, to a ps file. a2ps gives weird characters
in the non-english character's place. Then I discovered u2ps, but it
gives boxes instead with some messages given by the u2ps command:
$> u2ps 20070
19 matches
Mail list logo
