On 2009-08-29 14:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:10 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:27:21AM +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
Charles wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lal
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 17:43 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Lale wrote:
> > Charles wrote:
> >> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
> >> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> Hotmail
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:10 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:27:21AM +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> >> Charles wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
> >>> Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
>
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:27:21AM +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
>> Charles wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
>>> Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> Hotmail does not like Iceweasel.
>
>> Yes, it's Iceweasel that
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:27:21AM +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> Charles wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> >>> Hotmail does not like Iceweasel.
> Yes, it's Iceweasel that has the problem.
Hmmm... It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Lale wrote:
> Charles wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
Hotmail does not like Iceweasel.
>>> Duh! When has Microsoft played well with others exce
Charles wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
>>> Hotmail does not like Iceweasel.
>> Duh! When has Microsoft played well with others except when
>> politically convenient for them? Have you considered using a
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:42:09 -0700
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> > Hotmail does not like Iceweasel.
>
> Duh! When has Microsoft played well with others except when
> politically convenient for them? Have you considered using a
> higher quality ema
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:51 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
> Hotmail does not like Iceweasel.
Duh! When has Microsoft played well with others except when politically
convenient for them? Have you considered using a higher quality email
provider?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Sven Joachim wrote:
[...]
>
> Out of curiosity, why are you using Hotmail?
>
[...]
I wouldn't touch it myself, but other users (family) of my computer do. My
daughter has grudgingly allowed me to put a small Linux partition on her laptop,
but she won't use it if her email doesn't work.
--
Chris.
On 2009-08-27 21:51 +0200, Chris Lale wrote:
> Hotmail does not like Iceweasel. If you send a message, using Lenny or
> Squeeze,
> the whole body is empty. The text you entered is missing. You can check this
> by
> looking in your "Sent" folder.
Out of curiosity, why are you using Hotmail?
> I
Hotmail does not like Iceweasel. If you send a message, using Lenny or Squeeze,
the whole body is empty. The text you entered is missing. You can check this by
looking in your "Sent" folder.
I recently found a solution at
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/iceweasel-3.0.5-hotmail-no
12 matches
Mail list logo
