On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:25:00PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
[...]
> Guilty as charged. :-(
>
>
> Using Thunderbird, clicking "Reply List" and changing the Subject to
> "new subject [was: old subject]" is NOT the way to do it. Clicking
> "Write", and cutting and pasting the Subject and/
On 2021-09-17 at 15:25, David Christensen wrote:
> On 9/17/21 1:46 AM, Brian wrote:
>
>> However, a new discussion should be started in a*new* thread, not
>> plonked willy-nilly into an existing thread. This is the second
>> time recently that someone has done that. The first time it
>> involved
On 9/17/21 1:46 AM, Brian wrote:
However, a new discussion should be started in a*new* thread, not
plonked willy-nilly into an existing thread. This is the second time
recently that someone has done that. The first time it involved an
experienced user!
Guilty as charged. :-(
Using Thunder
> edges of text characters. So if showing a screen full of text to show
> the error, smunch the daylights out of it, it will still be readable.
Whatever happened to the idea of citing the actual text rather than
using an (unreadable) image?
Stefan
On Friday 17 September 2021 09:10:01 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > edges of text characters. So if showing a screen full of text to
> > show the error, smunch the daylights out of it, it will still be
> > readable.
>
> Whatever happened to the idea of citing the actual text rather than
> using an (unr
On Friday 17 September 2021 04:46:20 Brian wrote:
> On Thu 16 Sep 2021 at 21:48:55 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:46:43 -0300
> >
> > Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> > > Why am i unable to start a new discussion? I have sent 4 messages!
> > > They have one attachment that is less
On Thu 16 Sep 2021 at 21:48:55 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:46:43 -0300
> Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
> > Why am i unable to start a new discussion? I have sent 4 messages!
> > They have one attachment that is less than 150KiB - so, they are not
> > considered big, for the li
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 09:48:55PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:46:43 -0300
> Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
> > Why am i unable to start a new discussion? I have sent 4 messages!
> > They have one attachment that is less than 150KiB - so, they are not
> > considered big, for the
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:46:43 -0300
Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> Why am i unable to start a new discussion? I have sent 4 messages!
> They have one attachment that is less than 150KiB - so, they are not
> considered big, for the list, right?
I consider 150 KiB to be monstrous.
Have you tried sending a
On Jo, 16 sep 21, 11:19:11, David Christensen wrote:
> On 9/16/21 12:40 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 15 sep 21, 17:48:39, Hans wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2021, 16:41:21 CEST schrieb nimrod:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > got the same problem, when the ethernet interface is up, too and
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 07:46:43PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> Why am i unable to start a new discussion? I have sent 4 messages! They
> have one attachment that is less than 150KiB - so, they are not
> considered big, for the list, right?
I don't know what the maximum allowed attachment size is
On 9/16/21 12:40 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 15 sep 21, 17:48:39, Hans wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2021, 16:41:21 CEST schrieb nimrod:
Hi,
got the same problem, when the ethernet interface is up, too and I am on wifi.
This a problem with the gateway settings.
Unless my understandin
On Mi, 15 sep 21, 17:48:39, Hans wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2021, 16:41:21 CEST schrieb nimrod:
> Hi,
>
> got the same problem, when the ethernet interface is up, too and I am on wifi.
> This a problem with the gateway settings.
Unless my understanding of local networks is wrong, the ga
On 9/15/21 7:41 AM, nimrod wrote:
Hi,
my devices (pc, laptops, smartphone) all can surf the internet without
problems. So one would say that the router is working properly.
But computer A cannot access computer B via SSH as it's alwais being
doing for years, and viceversa. They cannot even ping
On 9/15/21 10:51 AM, nimrod wrote:
Hi,
my devices (pc, laptops, smartphone) all can surf the internet without
problems. So one would say that the router is working properly.
But computer A cannot access computer B via SSH as it's alwais being
doing for years, and viceversa. They cannot even
>
> My solution is remove the kernel module (in my case it is ath5k.ko, as it
> is
> an Atheros card). Removing it with "rmmod ath5k", and when I need to use
> it
> again, I restart it using "modprobe ath5k".
>
> If you are wired connected, you can try "ifconfig eth0 down" or whatever
> your
> ethe
Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2021, 16:41:21 CEST schrieb nimrod:
Hi,
got the same problem, when the ethernet interface is up, too and I am on wifi.
This a problem with the gateway settings.
My solution is remove the kernel module (in my case it is ath5k.ko, as it is
an Atheros card). Removing it
>
> Computer A can ping computer C instead, and viceversa. No PC can access
> the printer website nor print any more. Nor can I scan documents as I could
> before, because the scanner is part of the printer.
>
>
Please show "ip addr" and "ip nei show" from all Linux machines and
"ipconfig" and "arp
Hi,
my devices (pc, laptops, smartphone) all can surf the internet without
problems. So one would say that the router is working properly.
But computer A cannot access computer B via SSH as it's alwais being
doing for years, and viceversa. They cannot even ping each other. No
firewall on them at
Hi,
my devices (pc, laptops, smartphone) all can surf the internet without
problems. So one would say that the router is working properly.
But computer A cannot access computer B via SSH as it's alwais being
doing for years, and viceversa. They cannot even ping each other. No
firewall on them at
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 12:48:35 PM Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:05:12AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> > > Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> > > It was very straightforward
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:05:12AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> > Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> > It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> > configuration - two W
On Saturday, April 14, 2018 03:57:08 AM Reco wrote:
> Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> configuration - two WiFi APs with the same SSID ('AP name' in layman
> terms), each brigded to the same wired
Reco wrote:
> Back in the day I used two Raspberry Pi for improving WiFi coverage.
> It was very straightforward, although somewhat unconventional
> configuration - two WiFi APs with the same SSID ('AP name' in layman
> terms), each brigded to the same wired VLAN. Worked better than I was
> anticip
David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Well, nice that they're starting to do that ... it's still a Linksys, so
>> (not having any experience with it either), I'd lean toward it not being
>> that great of a device.
>
> That's a shame. I was moving toward
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:17:06AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > > Dan Purgert wrote:
> > >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the s
On Mon 09 Apr 2018 at 10:21:46 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the same
> >> channel as the upstream AP. It *cannot* use a different channel.
> >>
> >>
Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> If you have a device repeating a WiFi signal, it *will* use the same
>> channel as the upstream AP. It *cannot* use a different channel.
>>
>> In the event you have a dual-band AP, and the following conditions are
>
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:00:31 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
>> > Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>> >>
>> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other client
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 00:32:05 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> David Wright wrote:
> >> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it mea
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:00:31 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
> >>
> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
> >> or is it
David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> David Wright wrote:
>> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you
On Sat 07 Apr 2018 at 20:17:56 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >>
> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
> >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
>
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>>
>> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
>> its time between pretending to be an AP for a client device, and
>>
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> Celejar wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> >> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> Yep, you've got the terms righ
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Celejar wrote:
>> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
>> > Dan Purgert wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>> >>
>> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other client
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 10:00:31 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Yep, you've got the terms right.
> >>
> >> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
> >> or is it J
Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Yep, you've got the terms right.
>>
>> Does the buffalo also provide wifi access to other clients close to it?
>> or is it JUST trying to pretend that it's a client device to the
>> TP-Link?
>
> I'm no
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:30:24 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> >> Joe wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> >> > with multiple Ethernet ports are swi
Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Joe wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
>> > with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
>> > Indeed, many routers can be configur
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:30 - (UTC)
Dan Purgert wrote:
> Joe wrote:
> > [...]
> > I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> > with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
> > Indeed, many routers can be configured as VLANs.
>
> Hubs pr
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 13:09:00 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> David Wright wrote:
>> >
>> > --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> > Content-Disposition: inline
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> >
>> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), D
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 12:49:16 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > The software might not support it, but if openwrt or ddwrt can run
> > > on the hardware, they should support bridging.
> >
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The software might not support it, but if openwrt or ddwrt can run
> > on the hardware, they should support bridging.
>
> I can make sure the router I buy can run openwrt or ddwrt, but it
>
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 10:24:36 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > 1: I suppose there might be some network hardware which doesn't
> > > support actual bridging of wired interfaces, but I've
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > 1: I suppose there might be some network hardware which doesn't
> > support actual bridging of wired interfaces, but I've yet to see
> > such an example.
>
> I think the router I've been usi
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 08:48:50 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote
On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 13:09:00 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> >
> > --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> On We
On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 23:26:38 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that a
Joe wrote:
> [...]
> I'd have thought that hardwired hubs are long gone, that all devices
> with multiple Ethernet ports are switches and therefore software-based.
> Indeed, many routers can be configured as VLANs.
Hubs pretty much are. Not entirely sure where you're thinking switches
are "softwa
David Wright wrote:
>
> --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
>> > When you reprogram routers with dd-w
On Friday, March 16, 2018 08:53:00 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I haven't had the need to do that, and I'm not quite sure how I would go
> about it, but (thinking on the fly now), I might try putting a switch
> immediately after the modem, with two routers plugged into that, then a
> router and o
On Friday, March 16, 2018 04:48:50 AM Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> > I haven't paid attention to this thread from the beginning, but
> > looking at the sketch, I'm wondering what the purpose of the 2nd
> > router is? Why not instead of a route
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 23:26:38 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that a
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 09:42:25 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> > > wired bridging even though the manufacturer's fo
On Thu 15 Mar 2018 at 10:18:20 (-0700), Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> > When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> > wired bridging even though the manufacturer's formware doesn't allow
> > for that?
>
> openwrt and dd-wrt both allo
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, David Wright wrote:
> When you reprogram routers with dd-wrt, does that allow it to do, say,
> wired bridging even though the manufacturer's formware doesn't allow
> for that?
openwrt and dd-wrt both allow wired bridging[1] (or pseudo-bridging by
routing if your wireless hardw
On Wednesday 14 March 2018 22:24:26 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 09 Mar 2018 at 12:31:35 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > > For many years I have used my desktp
On Fri 09 Mar 2018 at 12:31:35 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server
> > > with two interfaces one facin
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:22:36 +0200
Johann Spies wrote:
> Thanks again for all the inputs.
>
> I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
>
> Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
> understand why I could not
> get it working with Shorewall which I have use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> I see I have broken the thread by adding [SOLVED] to the subject.
But only because gmail is a broken mail user agent: it seems to have
dropped the In-Reply-To header. The change of subjec
I see I have broken the thread by adding [SOLVED] to the subject.
Just to keep it in this thread:
I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
understand why I could not
get it working with Shorewall which I have used fo
Thanks again for all the inputs.
I have tried a third option: arno-iptables-firewall.
Now I can reach the internet from the local network. I still don't
understand why I could not
get it working with Shorewall which I have used for many years.
Regards
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loya
On 3/9/2018 3:30 PM, Johann Spies wrote:
For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
local network.
Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
available in parallel.
I
On Friday 09 March 2018 10:18:23 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server
> > with two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the
> > other the local network.
> >
>
Johann Spies wrote:
> For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
> two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
> local network.
>
> Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
> available in parallel.
>
> I have deci
Hi.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
> two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
> local network.
>
> Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both conn
For many years I have used my desktp as a network/firewall server with
two interfaces one facing the internet (through ADSL) and the other the
local network.
Now I have a fibre connection and for a month both connections will be
available in parallel.
I have decided to use my Raspberry Pi3 as the
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:39:07AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Curt wrote:
>> > On 2017-05-26, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>> >>>
>> >> It seems like you read my original problem as slowness accessing the
>> >> internet. That isn't the problem, I'm concerned about intra-LAN spee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2017年6月1日 20:21:51 JST, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:39:07AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Curt wrote:
>> > On 2017-05-26, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>> >>>
>> >> It seems like you read my original problem as slowness accessing
>t
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:39:07AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > On 2017-05-26, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >>>
> >> It seems like you read my original problem as slowness accessing the
> >> internet. That isn't the problem, I'm concerned about intra-LAN speeds.
> >> Haven't even got t
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 05:08:16PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-05-26, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >>
> > It seems like you read my original problem as slowness accessing the
> > internet. That isn't the problem, I'm concerned about intra-LAN speeds.
> > Haven't even got the length of worrying about
Curt wrote:
> On 2017-05-26, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>>>
>> It seems like you read my original problem as slowness accessing the
>> internet. That isn't the problem, I'm concerned about intra-LAN speeds.
>> Haven't even got the length of worrying about internet speeds yet, since
>> there are so m
On 2017-05-26, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>>
> It seems like you read my original problem as slowness accessing the
> internet. That isn't the problem, I'm concerned about intra-LAN speeds.
> Haven't even got the length of worrying about internet speeds yet, since
> there are so many variables that
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:09:08AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:18:06PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> > Channel selection is automatic -- shouldn't it pick the clearest one?
> > Also I am curious as to why sele
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:18:06PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Mark Fletcher wrote:
>> >
>> > My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
>> > Stretch, an LFS mini-ITX machine acting as my firewall, another LFS
On Friday 26 May 2017 04:17:10 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:38:21AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 May 2017 01:41:20 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > Couple things here. I have no such problems. My routing is from the
> > cable modem, to a buffalo netfinty router ru
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:18:06PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
> > Stretch, an LFS mini-ITX machine acting as my firewall, another LFS
> > laptop that is connected only
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:49:43AM -0400, Catherine Gramze wrote:
>
>
> > On May 20, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday 20 May 2017 01:41:20 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I have some dou
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:38:21AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 20 May 2017 01:41:20 Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> Couple things here. I have no such problems. My routing is from the cable
> modem, to a buffalo netfinty router running dd-wrt, so I need no
> firewall. dd-wrt has very sharp
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 06:17:41AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, May 20, 2017 01:41:20 AM Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> What is the laptop using--802.11a, b, g, n, or ac?
It's a high-end couple-of-years-old Toshiba laptop sold in Japan. It'll
be either N or AC. I believe the router
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:29:12AM +0200, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote:
> 2017-05-20 07:41 keltezéssel, Mark Fletcher írta:
> > I'd like to be able to diagnose what's going on here, why the transfer
> > was so slow. Any recommendations for tools I should research? I am very
> > willing to read man pages e
On Tue 23 May 2017 at 22:32:52 -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, May 22, 2017 08:28:54 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> >> Probably WPA2-PSK ("Pre Shared Key") -- just means "password auth".
> >> TBH, not having the SSID transmitted is actually LESS secure (overall)
>
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:18:06PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
> > Stretch, an LFS mini-ITX machine acting as my firewall, another LFS
> > laptop that is connected only
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, May 22, 2017 08:28:54 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Probably WPA2-PSK ("Pre Shared Key") -- just means "password auth".
>> TBH, not having the SSID transmitted is actually LESS secure (overall)
>> than just having it transmit, due to the fact that your client dev
On Monday, May 22, 2017 08:28:54 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
> Probably WPA2-PSK ("Pre Shared Key") -- just means "password auth".
> TBH, not having the SSID transmitted is actually LESS secure (overall)
> than just having it transmit, due to the fact that your client devices
> (phone, laptop, etc) have
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> This IoT stuff is way too damned close to 1984, the book.
>
>
http://anonymous-news.com/11-year-old-shocks-cybersecurity-experts-anything-wi-fi-can-weaponized/
--
Kent West<")))><
Westing Peacefully - http://kentwest.b
On Monday 22 May 2017 08:28:54 Dan Purgert wrote:
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 20, 2017 09:38:21 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> You'll note no mention of wifi here as its turned off unless I have
> >> children visiting with their smart phones. wifi is slower, and
> >> subject to
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, May 20, 2017 09:38:21 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
>> You'll note no mention of wifi here as its turned off unless I have
>> children visiting with their smart phones. wifi is slower, and subject
>> to being used by the neighbors as I found my net usage after the
On Sunday 21 May 2017 12:58:05 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, May 20, 2017 09:38:21 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > You'll note no mention of wifi here as its turned off unless I have
> > children visiting with their smart phones. wifi is slower, and
> > subject to being used by the neighbor
On Saturday, May 20, 2017 09:38:21 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> You'll note no mention of wifi here as its turned off unless I have
> children visiting with their smart phones. wifi is slower, and subject
> to being used by the neighbors as I found my net usage after the kids
> had been in was up abou
Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
> Stretch, an LFS mini-ITX machine acting as my firewall, another LFS
> laptop that is connected only occasionally, a Windows 8.1 laptop, 3
> iPhones of varying ages, 2 iPads, 1 Android t
On 05/19/2017 10:41 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Hello!
Hi! :-)
I have some doubts about the throughput of my home network and I'm
hoping for some advice on tools that might help me diagnose it.
My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
Stretch, an LFS mini-ITX ma
On Sat, 20 May 2017 14:41:20 +0900
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have some doubts about the throughput of my home network and I'm
> hoping for some advice on tools that might help me diagnose it.
...
> I'd like to be able to diagnose what's going on he
> On May 20, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 20 May 2017 01:41:20 Mark Fletcher wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have some doubts about the throughput of my home network and I'm
>> hoping for some advice on tools that mi
On Saturday 20 May 2017 01:41:20 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have some doubts about the throughput of my home network and I'm
> hoping for some advice on tools that might help me diagnose it.
>
> My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
>
On Saturday, May 20, 2017 01:41:20 AM Mark Fletcher wrote:
> The internet access is via Cable. I run an ethernet cable from the cable
> modem to the firewall machine, then from the firewall machine to the
> Linkstation's WAN port. The firewall machine's WiFi interface is
> disabled (I didn't includ
2017-05-20 07:41 keltezéssel, Mark Fletcher írta:
> I'd like to be able to diagnose what's going on here, why the transfer
> was so slow. Any recommendations for tools I should research? I am very
> willing to read man pages etc, but am a bit lost where to start. Google
> gave me a lot of Window
Hello!
I have some doubts about the throughput of my home network and I'm
hoping for some advice on tools that might help me diagnose it.
My home network consists of 2 Debian machines, one Jessie and one
Stretch, an LFS mini-ITX machine acting as my firewall, another LFS
laptop th
On 5/12/2016 6:23 PM, メット wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016年5月13日 3:03:06 JST, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 5/12/2016 9:20 AM, mett wrote:
[snip]
did u see debian wiki about creating a router with a pc?
No. I did a "title" search for "router" got 3 hits (all
rele
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
