On Friday 07 July 2006 21:15, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> what command are you exactly running?
running konqueror for surface in local files or on net...
> what does the error say?
the error is in initial mail... is large and boring ;) but this I
ignored the
error in the s
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:27 +0200, DeiviD wrote:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 19:48, DeiviD wrote:
> > Hi...
> >
> > I'm a new user of this mailing list... with a very annoying problem with my
> > kde. So, I use Debian Sarge and kde3.3.2. When I have open a window with
> > several tabs... sometimes i g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DeiviD wrote:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 19:48, DeiviD wrote:
>> Hi...
>>
>> I'm a new user of this mailing list... with a very annoying
>> problem with my kde. So, I use Debian Sarge and kde3.3.2. When
>> I have open a window with several tabs... somet
On Friday 07 July 2006 19:48, DeiviD wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I'm a new user of this mailing list... with a very annoying problem with my
> kde. So, I use Debian Sarge and kde3.3.2. When I have open a window with
> several tabs... sometimes i get a error that close the complete window and
> I have reboot
Hi...
I'm a new user of this mailing list... with a very annoying problem with my
kde. So, I use Debian Sarge and kde3.3.2. When I have open a window with
several tabs... sometimes i get a error that close the complete window and I
have reboot my task :(. The backtrace tell me this:
=
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:43:54PM +0100, boukhairi wrote:
> Does any one know what kind
> of information i'v got to
> put into lilo.conf (line append = "") to
> define resolution of the frame
> buffer on a radeon 7000
> (not vesa, as i know it cannot be over
> 1280x1024, isn'it ?)
>
> example for
Does any one know what kind
of information i'v got to
put into lilo.conf (line append = "") to
define resolution of the frame
buffer on a radeon 7000
(not vesa, as i know it cannot be over
1280x1024, isn'it ?)
example for a matrox graphic card:
append="video=matrox:mem:16318,xres:1408,yres:1056,de
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 06:25:21AM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
>
> This posting is rather old, but for completeness:
>
> I needed to put an DPkg:: in front of the lines, to make them work.
actually that is because i left out part of my config file, yours is
correct, but there is another way
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:49:18PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> and add this to your /etc/apt/apt.conf to make the remount automatic
> when you use apt-get to install or upgrade something:
>
> // Auto re-mounting of a readonly /usr
> Pre-Invoke {"mount -o remount,rw /usr";};
> Post-Invoke {"suidre
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:28:33AM -0400, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
> Another question relating to FS layout and organization: which
> partitions should be mounted NOSUID ? Someone on another (local) mailing
> list recommended that I mount /home NOSUID as a security precaution.
the better question is
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:08:32PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
:On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:07:09PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
:
:> /500M
:
:So much?
Yeh, your right... I'd be comfortable at 250M since /var and /tmp
are split off.
:
:> /usr 5G
:> /usr/local 3G
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:07:09PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> / 500M
So much?
> /usr 5G
> /usr/local3G
> /var 1.5G (keep cahe/apt/archives there too)
> /tmp 500M
> /home 7G (why mess with /misc too if you're the only user)
I would like
on my systems i dont like more then 120-130MB of swap per physical hd,
more then that(unless the drive is _really_ fast) could drag the system
down real bad. i usually make it a rule for me to include a 128MB swap
partition per hd no matter how much/little ram i have. the box im on now
is 512MB, wi
Hi,
this might be a bit off-topic, but I've read in several manuals that a swap
over 128 MB doesn't make much sense, but I never understood why. Can anyone
enlight me on that?
I'm using 128 MB of RAM and have a 128 MB swap, which is fine, but pretty
soon I'll be putting together a server box
>>"kmself" == kmself writes:
kmself> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:49:27PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> These are optional.
>> /opt 2048 MB No suid. Place to play with non vendor stuff
kmself> Symlink to /usr/local instead. Simpler space management, fewer
kmself> partitions.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:56:02PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> Well, I have think the following organization:
>
> / of 100 mb in a primary partition at the beginning of the disk, so
> lilo or grub can boot it.
> /usr of 3 gb (no comments... but should it be bigger?)
> /usr/local of
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:49:27PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> These are optional.
> /opt 2048 MB No suid. Place to play with non vendor stuff
Symlink to /usr/local instead. Simpler space management, fewer
partitions.
> /var/spool 12 GB No suid This is where my new
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:39:37PM -0600, Dave Thayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:58:46AM -0400, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > Why would you want to mount /usr read-only ?
>
> In addition to the security issues mentioned by other posters, for
> those of us without a UPS mounting large partiti
"S.Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "OM" == Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> split /usr amd /usr/local if they're just partitions on the same
> >> drive? > I could see doing that if they were on seperate disks
> >> to gain a little bump > in access spe
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:58:46AM -0400, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
> Why would you want to mount /usr read-only ?
In addition to the security issues mentioned by other posters, for
those of us without a UPS mounting large partitions r-o can save waiting
for fsck to do its thing after a power flicker
From: "S.Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem layout and hi everybody
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 00:58:46 -0400
>>>>> "OM" == Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:58:46AM -0400, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
> Why would you want to mount /usr read-only ?
A small added measure of security... Prevent accidental deletions...
--
/bin/sh ~/.signature:
Command not found
From: Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gregg C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem layout and hi everybody
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 19:03:28 -0800
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:34:23PM -0400, Gregg C wrote:
> Why split /usr
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:34:23PM -0400, Gregg C wrote:
> > Why split /usr amd /usr/local if they're just partitions on the same
> drive?
> > I could see doing that if they were on seperate disks to gain a little
> bump
> > in access speed.
>
> so if
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:34:23PM -0400, Gregg C wrote:
> Why split /usr amd /usr/local if they're just partitions on the same drive?
> I could see doing that if they were on seperate disks to gain a little bump
> in access speed.
so if you decide to reinstall the OS clean you can run mkfs on /
Why split /usr amd /usr/local if they're just partitions on the same drive?
I could see doing that if they were on seperate disks to gain a little bump
in access speed.
From: "Jonathan D. Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fil
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:56:02PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
:Well, I have think the following organization:
:
:/ of 100 mb in a primary partition at the beginning of the disk, so
: lilo or grub can boot it.
:/usr of 3 gb (no comments... but should it be bigger?)
:/usr/local of 1,5 gb
Hi,
>>"Juli-Manel" == Juli-Manel Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juli-Manel> I know the answer could differ A LOT from each person, but never
Juli-Manel> mind. I just want oppinions.
Well, here;s my take on the partitioning issue:
/boot32MBGenereally mounted read-on
Hi all,
first of all hello to everybody, because I've been off of this list
for a very long time...
Well, my question is about how should I organize my filesystem. I have
now Debian woody in a 1'7 gb hard disk; all the entire disk is mounted
on /, on a single partition.
Now, I will buy a 20 gb h
I've found potato to be quite stable via upgrading from slink. Of course this
stability of only an 'average'. There have been moments when things were very
ugly
(i.e. the whole perl upgrade mess), but on the whole it's been pretty smooth
for my
home machine. I don't think I'd trust potato with a
2 PM
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject:hi everybody
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > is there anybody out there??
> >
> > Uli
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > < /dev/null
> >
hi,
is there anybody out there??
Uli
32 matches
Mail list logo
