Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Clearly sent privately by mistake.
you are stupid asshole - I explicitly said I post in private
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Disregarding someone's request for privacy is rather disrespectful.
>
> When that happens for me, I reply with something that says, ~"keep it on
> the list, please"
Thank you
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 08:00:27 PM Karen Lewellen wrote:
> For me personally, I have been through too many sex assault's
I am sorry to hear that.
Oh I can respect your stance, even if I do not fully resonate.
If one wants privacy, best to say so, at the top, not several pages down.
For me personally, I have been through too many sex assault's not to insure
my request not to be contacted off list gets ignored, even if I am the
only p
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021 05:53:19 PM Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Clearly sent privately by mistake.
...
> > I send this in private, because of my private opinion here. I would
> > prefer we discuss this in private and perhaps you can convince me that
> > it is worth the effort. I do not know this too
Clearly sent privately by mistake.
In context a bit.
On Tue, 18 May 2021, deloptes wrote:
No - they start and run it until government=tax payers money flows in
Really? Can you please point me to governmental funded Linux projects for
any disability population?
I will share your list with t
Hi again,
While your point about publicly funded efforts may be a fine one,
locating those owners now presents a challenge.
On the one hand companies behind solid speech synthesis, like digital
equipment corporation who branded the superior dec-talk speech have
themselves sold items to others.
deloptes wrote:
> It resonates a lot - as I wrote thesis on dialogue systems and I got very
> disappointed by the facts I came across. IMO all technologies that were
> financed with public money (i.e. DARPA) should be made publicly available.
> In fact AFAIK there is only one engine (the mother of
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Sharing because while tts is indeed part of adaptive technology for many,
> and Linux default speech synthesis is not always of the best quality, the
> use of tts across devices serving the general public is becoming more
> extensive as well.
> There is an
Hi everyone,
Sharing because while tts is indeed part of adaptive technology for many,
and Linux default speech synthesis is not always of the best quality, the
use of tts across devices serving the general public is becoming more
extensive as well.
There is an effort at change.org asking Mic
10 matches
Mail list logo
