Thanks for your explanations. I figured out the issue; they meant "vanilla"
kernel from kernel.org.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:43 -0400 (EDT), Ashish Agarwal wrote:
> > # uname -r
> > 2.6.26.5-netkit-K2.8
> >
> > Presumably the prefix indica
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:43 -0400 (EDT), Ashish Agarwal wrote:
> # uname -r
> 2.6.26.5-netkit-K2.8
>
> Presumably the prefix indicates the kernel they based their patch on.
>
This is not the naming convention for a Debian kernel. The fourth
number for a stock Debian kernel is separated from th
# uname -r
2.6.26.5-netkit-K2.8
Presumably the prefix indicates the kernel they based their patch on.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:37:36 -0400 (EDT), Ashish Agarwal wrote:
> >
> > I'm using a Debian-based virtual machine customized by someone e
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:37:36 -0400 (EDT), Ashish Agarwal wrote:
>
> I'm using a Debian-based virtual machine customized by someone else. It is
> missing header files that I need. I was told to install the vanilla kernel
> package for version 2.6.26.5. Which package exactly would this be? I tried
>
I'm using a Debian-based virtual machine customized by someone else. It is
missing header files that I need. I was told to install the vanilla kernel
package for version 2.6.26.5. Which package exactly would this be? I tried
linux-headers-2.6.26.5 but:
# apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.26.5
Read
5 matches
Mail list logo
