Thx guys and girls.

I learned more, Interesting. Wrote a song mostly in Norwegian, Corona Cabaret Corona for associates to krona, Swedish currency about 1/10 €. & is a beer. All media talk die statistics Few mention profylaxe like garlic, onions, lemons, olives, bodily and most other lively interactions, laughter, tr

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 03:16:56PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi, > > 31 mars 2020 à 14:14 de robe...@debian.org: > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:36:19PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > > > >> You should specify the version like the following: > >> apt policy virtualbox-6.1 > >> > >> Not just

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

Hi, 31 mars 2020 à 14:14 de robe...@debian.org: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:36:19PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > >> You should specify the version like the following: >> apt policy virtualbox-6.1 >> >> Not just: >> apt policy virtualbox >> > 'virtualbox-6.1' is the name of the package in the O

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:36:19PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi, > > 31 mars 2020 à 13:21 de p...@hbsys.plus.com: > > > On 31/03/2020 00:13, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > >> What is the output of 'apt-cache policy virtualbox' on your system? > >> > > > > Good question! Whilst it *is* in th

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Ma, 31 mar 20, 13:36:19, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > Hi, > > 31 mars 2020 à 13:21 de p...@hbsys.plus.com: > > > On 31/03/2020 00:13, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > >> What is the output of 'apt-cache policy virtualbox' on your system? > >> > > > > Good question! Whilst it *is* in the repositories

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

Hi, 31 mars 2020 à 13:21 de p...@hbsys.plus.com: > On 31/03/2020 00:13, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > >> What is the output of 'apt-cache policy virtualbox' on your system? >> > > Good question! Whilst it *is* in the repositories I must have installed > it from Oracle during the Buster hiatus. > >

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On 31/03/2020 00:13, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:02:05AM +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: >> On 30/03/2020 19:59, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Michael wrote: On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:19:31 PM CEST, kaye n wrote: >>>

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:59:33 +0300 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 30 mar 20, 22:21:29, Joe wrote: > > > > Yes, that's basically it. I had upgraded to a version of Virtualbox > > which installed OK but the client extensions to that version of > > Virtualbox required a kernel version higher than t

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Lu, 30 mar 20, 22:21:29, Joe wrote: > > Yes, that's basically it. I had upgraded to a version of Virtualbox > which installed OK but the client extensions to that version of > Virtualbox required a kernel version higher than the Debian Stable one. > The client extensions allow more communicatio

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:02:05AM +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > On 30/03/2020 19:59, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Michael wrote: > >> On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:19:31 PM CEST, kaye n wrote: > >> > >>> But what if I want to get the latest version of

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On 30/03/2020 19:59, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Michael wrote: >> On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:19:31 PM CEST, kaye n wrote: >> >>> But what if I want to get the latest version of virtualbox which is 6.1.4 ? >> >> you can get a list of all available versions

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

I chose to install the packages provided by Lucas Nussbaum, a rather well known Debian developer: https://people.debian.org/~lucas/virtualbox-buster/ - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Web: https://www.n0nb.us

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:32:34 +0200 > the easiest way is to do > apt-get install virtualbox-6.1 Even more easy: apt install virtualbox-6.1 ;-)

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

David Christensen wrote: > I would: > > 1.  Run 'apt-get purge virtualbox-6.0'. > > 2.  Run 'rm /etc/apt/source.list.d/virtualbox.list'. > > 3.  Forget about the installed Oracle public keys; they should do no harm. > > 4.  Run 'apt-get update'. > > 5.  Install VirtualBox per the "Oracle® VM

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 02:43:51 +0800 kaye n wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:27 AM Joe wrote: > > > > > Be careful. Virtualbox pretty much needs the client extensions, and > > I once upgraded a Virtualbox past the point where the extensions > > worked with the Debian Stable kernel. > > > > -- >

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On 2020-03-30 11:19, kaye n wrote: Hello Friends! My system: Host: laptop Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.4 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) What do you think of this: https://www.tecmint.com/install-virtualbox-on-debian-10/ I've tried it and it works. It instal

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:04:48PM +0200, Michael wrote: > On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:59:44 PM CEST, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > ... Your suggestion, which would work for > > someone running Debian Sid, will not work in this case. > > yes, it would. > > if he was able to install 'virtualbox-6

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:59:44 PM CEST, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: ... Your suggestion, which would work for someone running Debian Sid, will not work in this case. yes, it would. if he was able to install 'virtualbox-6.0' he already added the necessary repositories from oracle. greeting

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Michael wrote: > On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:19:31 PM CEST, kaye n wrote: > > > But what if I want to get the latest version of virtualbox which is 6.1.4 ? > > you can get a list of all available versions with > apt list 'virtualbox-?\.?' > > and then j

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

Hi, 30 mars 2020 à 20:43 de guik...@gmail.com: > The reason I went with that > tecmint.com > 's method is > because if I download directly from virtualbox's website ( which I think is a > deb file?) and I execute the dpkg -i command, I get dependency issues.  But > the virt

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Monday, March 30, 2020 8:19:31 PM CEST, kaye n wrote: But what if I want to get the latest version of virtualbox which is 6.1.4 ? you can get a list of all available versions with apt list 'virtualbox-?\.?' and then just do: apt-get install virtualbox-6.1 Thank you! urw in the futur

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

kaye n wrote: > Hello Friends! > > My system: > > Host: laptop > Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64 > bits: 64 > Desktop: Xfce 4.12.4 > Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) > > What do you think of this: > https://www.tecmint.com/install-virtualbox-on-debian-10/ > > I've tried it and it works. It

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:27 AM Joe wrote: > > Be careful. Virtualbox pretty much needs the client extensions, and I > once upgraded a Virtualbox past the point where the extensions worked > with the Debian Stable kernel. > > -- > Joe > I'm sorry Joe, I have no idea what you just said. I only kn

Re: what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 02:19:31 +0800 kaye n wrote: > Hello Friends! > > My system: > > Host: laptop > Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64 > bits: 64 > Desktop: Xfce 4.12.4 > Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) > > What do you think of this: > https://www.tecmint.com/install-virtualbox-on-debian-10/ >

what do you guys think of this method of installing virtualbox

Hello Friends! My system: Host: laptop Kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.4 Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) What do you think of this: https://www.tecmint.com/install-virtualbox-on-debian-10/ I've tried it and it works. It installed version 6.0.18 But what if I wan

Re: guys

On 2020-02-02 15:01, Michael Stone wrote: On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:31:31PM +, mick crane wrote: I probably shouldn't post this. I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. Is there a reason things

Re: guys

On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:31:31PM +, mick crane wrote: I probably shouldn't post this. I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. Is there a reason things seem to get more complicated ? Because p

Re: guys

On Sb, 01 feb 20, 19:31:31, mick crane wrote: > I probably shouldn't post this. > I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. > It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. > Is there a reason things seem to get more complicated ? https://lists.debian

Re: guys

On 2/2/20 7:53 am, Ben Lavender wrote: Even though RTM always applies, sometimes things do get more complicated with lesser experienced users regardless and sometimes other peoples issues aren't always related to FAQ/DOC/MAN etc This is a users mailing list after all. On 01/02/2020 19:31, mic

Re: guys

mick crane wrote: ... > I have heard that expression RTFM before, I dunno, I'm probably out of > order yet feeling is things are getting more complicated when you'd > think things should be getting simpler. do it for 40yrs and get back to us... songbird

Re: guys

On Sat 01 Feb 2020 at 15:45:07 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote: > On Sat 01 Feb 2020 at 19:31:31 (+), mick crane wrote: > > I probably shouldn't post this. > > I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. > > It is supposed to be files with documentation what they d

Re: guys

Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2020 01 Feb 13:48 -0600, Joe wrote: >> Whether you read or not, Debian is getting more complicated, and >> therefore more problems are occurring. > > True to a point but then we have more complicated systems to deal with, > including but not limited to, EUFI and Secure

Re: guys

* On 2020 01 Feb 13:48 -0600, Joe wrote: > Whether you read or not, Debian is getting more complicated, and > therefore more problems are occurring. True to a point but then we have more complicated systems to deal with, including but not limited to, EUFI and Secure Boot, which I use on this deskt

Re: guys

Even though RTM always applies, sometimes things do get more complicated with lesser experienced users regardless and sometimes other peoples issues aren't always related to FAQ/DOC/MAN etc This is a users mailing list after all. On 01/02/2020 19:31, mick crane wrote: I probably shouldn't pos

Re: guys

> I probably shouldn't post this. > I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. > It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. > Is there a reason things seem to get more complicated ? What's with all these "I"s? Stefan

Re: guys

On Sat 01 Feb 2020 at 19:31:31 +, mick crane wrote: > I probably shouldn't post this. Certainly not with the subject line you have given it, no. Adding "and dolls" would have been led to a lengthier thread with more discussion. :) > I see all these questions people trying to get their instal

Re: guys

On 2020-02-01 19:35, Reco wrote: Hi. On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:31:31PM +, mick crane wrote: I probably shouldn't post this. I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. Is there a reason things see

Re: guys

On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:35:49 +0300 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:31:31PM +, mick crane wrote: > > I probably shouldn't post this. > > I see all these questions people trying to get their installations > > to work. It is supposed to be files with documentation what the

Re: guys

Hi. On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:31:31PM +, mick crane wrote: > I probably shouldn't post this. > I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. > It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. > Is there a reason things seem to get more complica

guys

I probably shouldn't post this. I see all these questions people trying to get their installations to work. It is supposed to be files with documentation what they do. Is there a reason things seem to get more complicated ? mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

On 07/12/2014 02:26 PM, Siard wrote: Steve Litt wrote: As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys using to fill that need? AFAIR, youtube-dl was not admitted to stable because it is subject to changes, due to changes in YouTube itself. This

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

Steve Litt wrote: > As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either youtube-dl or > minitube. What are you guys using to fill that need? AFAIR, youtube-dl was not admitted to stable because it is subject to changes, due to changes in YouTube itself. This was something the maker of y

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/12/2014 07:26 AM, The Wanderer wrote: > On 07/12/2014 07:18 AM, Steve Litt wrote: >> smplayer. As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either >> youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys using to fill that need? > >

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote: $ ejynt='Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/536.26.17(KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.2 Safari/536.26.17' Actually, you might not need to spoof the user-agent. But I've come to expect intentional breakage along th

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

Hey Steve. On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Steve Litt wrote: Hi all, The way I get throttled, occasionally the only way I can watch a Youtube video is to download it first and then watch it with smplayer. As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 07:18:46 -0400 Steve Litt wrote: > smplayer. As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either > youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys using to fill that need? I use Downloadhelper (mozilla plugin). -- <@Lucos> too much people there! *** Lucos was ki

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

On 07/12/2014 07:18 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi all, The way I get throttled, occasionally the only way I can watch a Youtube video is to download it first and then watch it with smplayer. As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys using to fill

Re: What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

no package for either > youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys using to fill that need? I mainly use cclive, since it works with more sites than youtube-dl did last time I checked. (I have plenty of bandwidth for streaming, I just refuse to watch non-live streaming video without a very good rea

What do you guys use instead of youtube-dl and minitube?

Hi all, The way I get throttled, occasionally the only way I can watch a Youtube video is to download it first and then watch it with smplayer. As far as I can see, Wheezy has no package for either youtube-dl or minitube. What are you guys using to fill that need? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt

Thanks, Guys :-) was: Re: Preseeded setting on openssh-server ignored

On Saturday 14 June 2014 11:57:59 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 13 June 2014 22:02:06 Bob Proulx wrote: > > Just to plug a good tool I like using pwgen to generate truly random > > passwords.  A long random password is sufficiently difficult to > > exploit.  If you are using passwords that are easy

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Mon 14 Mar 2011 at 19:02:50 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:16, Brian wrote: > > > But Twinkle with sipdiscount.com suits me when I choose to use it. What > > will happen when qt4 comes along is not quite known. > > > > Qt4 came around a good three years ago! http://b

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On 2011-03-14 18:59:36, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:40, Allan Wind > wrote: > > Make sure you tweak the settings (codecs, bandwidth) before giving > > up on Ekiga. > > I'm not an audio engineer, I quite rely on the software to tweak those > settings for me. What settings woul

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Lu, 14 mar 11, 19:02:50, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > Quite right. What is the preferred method of video conferencing in > Linux with others who will likely be using Windows? Yes, the video is > a necessity. Otherwise we would just pick up the phone! Unfortunately I haven't found anything that worke

Re: Re (2): SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 18:29, wrote: > *       From: Dotan Cohen > *       Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:02:50 +0200 >> Is there an better softphone? > > You can try Twinkle.  The contact list and configuration are > text file based; design is generally spartan; no video. > >> Is there a better sip

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:16, Brian wrote: > You forgot the fourth question. "Is there a better way than using a > softphone?" > Quite right. What is the preferred method of video conferencing in Linux with others who will likely be using Windows? Yes, the video is a necessity. Otherwise we woul

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:41, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: >> I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most >> important contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed >> Ekiga and signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP addresses,

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:40, Allan Wind wrote: > Make sure you tweak the settings (codecs, bandwidth) before giving > up on Ekiga. I'm not an audio engineer, I quite rely on the software to tweak those settings for me. What settings would you recommend? >  That said Ekiga seems unstable on Wi

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:43, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > I don't spend a lot of time in Windows but I believe the two big freely > available softphones are SJPhone and 3CX - John > > Thanks, I'll google them. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:25, Rob Owens wrote: > I haven't used ekiga in about a year, but I always found their service > to be spotty.  iptel.org was much more reliable, and you can use it with > the Ekiga software. > Thanks, I will look at that service. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.i

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:24, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:17 AM, John A. Sullivan III > wrote: >> Interesting.  I can see KDE applications if they are based upon Qt4 or >> were compiled using the commercial Qt3. I wasn't aware that Gnome apps >> could run without Cygwin and

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:17 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > Interesting.  I can see KDE applications if they are based upon Qt4 or > were compiled using the commercial Qt3. I wasn't aware that Gnome apps > could run without Cygwin and thought that most simply silently bundled > it but may very

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 20:56 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 13:53, John A. Sullivan III > wrote: > > > > If I recall correctly, the question was about Windows solutions. Many > > of those suggested are Linux only. I don't know about Ekiga but my > > guess would be it is run

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 13:53, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > If I recall correctly, the question was about Windows solutions.  Many > of those suggested are Linux only.  I don't know about Ekiga but my > guess would be it is running on cygwin which introduces a considerable > shim between Ekiga

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun 13 Mar 2011 at 00:02:50 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most > important contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed > Ekiga and signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP addresses, but the sound > quality was very choppy and unusable. T

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 12:43 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:02:50 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most important > > contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed Ekiga and > > signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP address

Re (2): SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

* From: Dotan Cohen * Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:02:50 +0200 > Is there an better softphone? You can try Twinkle. The contact list and configuration are text file based; design is generally spartan; no video. > Is there a better sip address service than ekiga.net? I use it with Twi

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:02:50 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most important > contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed Ekiga and > signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP addresses, but the sound quality was very > choppy and unusable. The

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most > important contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed > Ekiga and signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP addresses, but the sound > quality was very choppy and unusable. They

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On 2011-03-12 17:25:03, Rob Owens wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:02:50AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most > > important contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed > > Ekiga and signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP addresses, but

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 17:25 -0500, Rob Owens wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:02:50AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most > > important contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed > > Ekiga and signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP add

Re: SIP services and softphones: what do you guys use?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:02:50AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > I'm trying to get rid of proprietary Skype and two of my most > important contacts are willing to give SIP a try. We all installed > Ekiga and signed up for ~@ekiga.net SIP addresses, but the sound > quality was very choppy and unusable

Re: Thanks, guys \o/ \o/ was: Re: Persuading an Atheros wireless card to function in Lenny

On Saturday 20 February 2010 14:31:25 Lisi wrote: > exhuberant Ouch! Typing is _not_ my strongpoint. :-( s/exhuberant/exuberant Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:/

Thanks, guys \o/ \o/ was: Re: Persuading an Atheros wireless card to function in Lenny

I started down the madwifi route, but hit problems: including, but not limited to, an initial c. I know that i means installed, and I think I know that v is virtual, but c I don't know. I tried installing anyway, but of course couldn't. So I shelved that pro tem and installed the kernel that

Newsletter Article: Where Have All the Good Guys Gone?

1264 Where Have All the Good Guys Gone? – by Mark Deavall I read on the news that President Obama is meeting with world leaders to discuss ways of fixing the world economy (simply put), and this got me thinking about what we should expect from this “summit”. Or to put it another way, what exp

screw u guys!!!

screw u guys!!! - Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.

Two nice guys have sent me latest issue from chinaleadershipmonitor

Thank you again! To other people: Please do not send. Maybe I will need you three months later when new issue is available. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Alvin Oga wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Tyson Varosyan wrote: Again, I apologize for posting a Windows-based problem on this board, but I still providing entertainment of your sillyness .. #1: Edit your httpd.conf file. Find the line that reads "listen :80" and replace it with the

Re: fun Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Alvin Oga wrote: i'm a sucker for flamebait andpoking fun ... :-0 always fun if one doesn't emotional about it and hopefully learn a thing or 2 along the way.. AKA "Trolling". to me... it was 100% in fun .. but i guess i can see how it can also be rude when one makes fun of somebody else

RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Em Ter, 2006-01-31 às 15:22 -0800, Tyson Varosyan escreveu: > Hi Ed, > > Thanks for the response. However, I feel that you reverse-engineered the > answer here. Instead of searching for how to install multiple instances of > httpd (which is what the manual says to do), you already knew that answer

fun Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

hi ya kent On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Kent West wrote: > Alvin, you and I have both been on this list long enough that it's > obvious to me that you're a smart guy with lots of valuable knowledge > and skills. But why be rude? yeah... i guess it's easy to confuse "rude" with "poking fun at um" i'm a

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 03:22:08PM -0800, Tyson Varosyan wrote: > Hi Ed, > > Thanks for the response. However, I feel that you reverse-engineered the > answer here. Instead of searching for how to install multiple instances of > httpd (which is what the manual says to do), you already knew that an

RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

, Uptime Technical Solutions LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.up-times.com 206-715-TECH (8324) UpTime/OnTime/AnyTime -Original Message- From: Edward Shornock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:14 PM To: Debian User List Subject: Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

According to Tyson Varosyan, > Given the fact that Katipo and Alvin were the only ones to reply to this > thread and nether proved to know anything about how to resolve my issue, I > thought that I should post the resolution here so that others looking for > the answer later would not have to bo

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

) UpTime/OnTime/AnyTime -Original Message- From: thierry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 12:56 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff... Tyson Varosyan wrote: Given the fact that Katipo and Alvin

Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:58:12 -0800 Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > > Kent West wrote: > > >> At the risk of > >> seriously offending the atheists on this list and getting flamed, I'd > >> suggest the world would be a better place if we'd listen to Leviticus >

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:12:12AM -0800, Tyson Varosyan wrote: > Yes, I did google and search forums before posting here. Please, feel free > to post any google results that explain how to install multiple instances of > httpd on a Windows machine (like the manual states.) A quick Google search y

RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

echnical Solutions LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.up-times.com 206-715-TECH (8324) UpTime/OnTime/AnyTime -Original Message- From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:39 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

> Tyson Varosyan wrote: > At the risk of having my hand slapped that says it all. He asked knowing he'd likely get slapped and he did. One should not be surprised by predictable results. And one should certainly not be offended and resort to name-calling when those predictable results are no

Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Johannes Wiedersich wrote: Kent West wrote: At the risk of seriously offending the atheists on this list and getting flamed, I'd suggest the world would be a better place if we'd listen to Leviticus 19:14: "Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind." This was origina

Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Kent West wrote: At the risk of seriously offending the atheists on this list and getting flamed, I'd suggest the world would be a better place if we'd listen to Leviticus 19:14: "Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind." This was originally written for the Jews on

Re: wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Alvin Oga wrote: >On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Tyson Varosyan wrote: > > >>Sorry that I made you feel so incompetent. >> >> > >you're proving your own incompetence > >i doubt anybody would do what you suggest to get virtual domains working > >and there may be more than one solution.. but yours is n

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Tyson Varosyan wrote: >Again, I apologize for posting a Windows-based problem on this board, but I >did so with the assumption that there would be many Apache users here and >that the more experienced ones may know how to help me in Windows and Linux. > > >I reinforced my belief in the >reasons

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

>From "How to Ask Questions the Smart Way" (which you would do well to read in its entirety at http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ): http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#forum : Be sensitive in choosing where you ask your question. You are likely to be ignored, or wr

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Tyson Varosyan wrote: > > Given the fact that Katipo and Alvin were the only ones to reply to this > thread and nether proved to know anything about how to resolve my issue, I > thought that I should post the resolution here so that others looking for > the answer later would not have to bother th

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 05:05:20AM -0500, Edward Shornock wrote: > Guess what you did? =) At least the "assholes" (Alvin & Kapito Sorry Katipo for the typo :/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Two wrongs may not make a right, but I don't particularly care, hence the tone of this reply. :P On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:15:02AM -0800, Tyson Varosyan wrote: > Given the fact that Katipo and Alvin were the only ones to reply to this > thread and nether proved to know anything about how to resol

wrong RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Tyson Varosyan wrote: > Again, I apologize for posting a Windows-based problem on this board, but I still providing entertainment of your sillyness .. > #1: Edit your httpd.conf file. Find the line that reads "listen :80" and > replace it with the IP of website #1 followed

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

al Manager, Uptime Technical Solutions LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.up-times.com 206-715-TECH (8324) UpTime/OnTime/AnyTime -Original Message- From: Katipo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 12:59 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Not a Debian question

RE: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Solutions LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.up-times.com 206-715-TECH (8324) UpTime/OnTime/AnyTime -Original Message- From: Katipo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 12:59 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff

Re: Not a Debian question, but you guys know this stuff...

Alvin Oga wrote: On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Tyson Varosyan wrote: At the risk of having my hand slapped I will ask, since I bet there are quite a few Apache users on this board. ... I am using Windows 2000 and Apache 2.0.44 ... Technical Manager, Uptime Technical Solutions

  1   2   >