Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-08 Thread Michelle Storm
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:32:01PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:22:40PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Robert L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1327 -0500]: > > > If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone > > > know the fix

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-08 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:22:40PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Robert L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1327 -0500]: > > If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone > > know the fix for this? I've poked around and prodded the options in > > my mu

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:27:46PM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote: > If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone > know the fix for this? I've poked around and prodded the options in > my muttrc and no-luck. It's not just Martin, anyone who's ID I don't > have on my rin

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread Brian Nelson
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hey all, > > so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was > quite a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged > something like a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously, > when i had signed keys with close friends, we'

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread Robert L. Harris
Bingo, but had to move ".gnupg/options to .gnupg/gpg.conf" of course. Thanks. Thus spake martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:22:40 -0500 > From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: gpg k

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Robert L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1327 -0500]: > If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone > know the fix for this? I've poked around and prodded the options in > my muttrc and no-luck. It's not just Martin, anyone who's ID I don't > have o

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread Robert L. Harris
not just Martin, anyone who's ID I don't have on my ring already. Robert Thus spake martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:01:06 -0500 > From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: gpg key signing pro

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1134 -0500]: > so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was quite > a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged something like > a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously, when i had > signed keys with clo

Re: gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread Stephen Gran
> hey all, > > so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was > quite a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged > something like a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously, > when i had signed keys with close friends, we'd just end up doing a > bunch of gpg --s

gpg key signing protocol question

2002-11-07 Thread sean finney
hey all, so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was quite a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged something like a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously, when i had signed keys with close friends, we'd just end up doing a bunch of gpg --sendkeys and gp