On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 04:18:28PM +0100, Hans wrote:
> I am answering myself.
>...
> Then I could export the keys using the correct syntax (name of the key, not
> some filename).
Probably like
gpg --export-secret-key 8A7F208C6D9E73291657414D2135D123D8C19BEC > precious
> Such I got a new
Am Samstag, 25. März 2023, 15:52:03 CET schrieb Hans:
I am answering myself.
It is now working. Problem was, that I first tried to use the
"lkhjpoqwrpoqfjiah.key" files below ".gnupg/private-keys--v1.d/, which did not
work.
Then, during testings, I changed permissions of .gnupg, which led to a
* 2023-03-25 14:37:10+0100, Hans wrote:
> I tried, but ran into the same issue:
>
> LANG=C gpg --export-secret-key
> /home/ullhan63/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/123456789.key > testkey
Wrong argument. "gpg --export-secret-key" does not want filename
argument. It wants key id, key fingerprint or us
Hmm, maybe it is because I changed the permissions during my testing purposes.
I reset them to original and tried again.
The error is gone, but nothing is exported.
Ok, thanks guys, I will try some more. Maybe kleopatra is interfeering with my
keys.
If I know more, I will let you know.
Best
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 02:37:10PM +0100, Hans wrote:
> LANG=C gpg --export-secret-key
> /home/ullhan63/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/123456789.key >
> testkey
> gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir '/home/myusername/.gnupg'
> gpg: WARNING: nothing exported
>
> Strange.
Did you read t
Hi Geert,
I tried, but ran into the same issue:
LANG=C gpg --export-secret-key
/home/ullhan63/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/123456789.key >
testkey
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir '/home/myusername/.gnupg'
gpg: WARNING: nothing exported
Strange.
Best regards
Hans
> If I rec
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I wanted to import my secret key into thunderbird, but thunderbird
> can not read the directory.
>
> What an I doing wrong?
>
> I do (my thunderbird is in German, so my English translation might
> not be quite accurate):
>
>
Hi folks,
I wanted to import my secret key into thunderbird, but thunderbird can not read
the directory.
What an I doing wrong?
I do (my thunderbird is in German, so my English translation might not be quite
accurate):
- starting thunderbird
- chose in "Open PGP" the option "add key"
- cl
Reco wrote on 5/16/20 6:14 PM:
sed -i '/^keyserver-options/d' ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
Thanks! Solves the problem!
Hi.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 04:08:18PM -0500, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> The tor website says to use the command
>
> > gpg --auto-key-locate nodefault,wkd --locate-keys torbrow...@torproject.org
>
> When I do that I get an error message
>
> > gpg: keyserver option 'ca-cert-file' is obsolete;
The tor website says to use the command
gpg --auto-key-locate nodefault,wkd --locate-keys torbrow...@torproject.org
When I do that I get an error message
gpg: keyserver option 'ca-cert-file' is obsolete; please use 'hkp-cacert' in
dirmngr.conf
I have searched the net and man pages and I c
On 03/14/2018 09:14 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On 14/03/18 03:26, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Just run `gpg --refresh-keys` from time to time.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I have updated my keyring:
>
> GNUPG seems to have found 9 new signatures ('firmas' in spanish) from
> Richard.
>
> The o
Hi, Ansgar.
On 14/03/18 03:26, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>>> You can change the expiry date of your own key, but for other people to
>>> be able to see it and avoid having your key show up as expired, you must
>>> publish the new (key? signature? not sure...) and others must fetch it
>>> before the
Richard Hector writes:
> On 14/03/18 15:50, likcoras wrote:
>> You can change the expiry date of your own key, but for other people to
>> be able to see it and avoid having your key show up as expired, you must
>> publish the new (key? signature? not sure...) and others must fetch it
>> before the
On 3/14/2018 4:20 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 14/03/18 15:50, likcoras wrote:
On 03/14/2018 11:39 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
And if I search for my key here:
https://pgp.surfnet.nl/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0xb4a2f08fec70168d
... I can see that there is a self-sig with the ex
On 14/03/18 15:50, likcoras wrote:
> On 03/14/2018 11:39 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> And if I search for my key here:
>>
>> https://pgp.surfnet.nl/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0xb4a2f08fec70168d
>>
>> ... I can see that there is a self-sig with the expiry date Daniel
>> mentioned, bu
On 03/14/2018 11:39 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
> And if I search for my key here:
>
> https://pgp.surfnet.nl/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0xb4a2f08fec70168d
>
> ... I can see that there is a self-sig with the expiry date Daniel
> mentioned, but also one for the one I'm seeing.
You c
Hi all,
Daniel Bareiro recently pointed out that he sees my GPG key as being
expired:
On 14/03/18 15:14, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> This is the information I see in Thunderbird with Enigmail:
>
> Fingerprint: 9E11 77C0 8F96 98B8 82EF 70E4 B4A2 F08F EC70 168D
> Created: 05/09/2010
>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Tried "gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys B5D0C804ADB11277" and it pulled
> down the "Etch Stable Release Key " key.
>
> $ gpg --fingerprint ADB11277
> pub 1024D/ADB11277 2006-09-17
> Key fingerprint = 7EA3 91D7 2477 203B
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 09:44:01 -0600
"mike cutie and maia" wrote:
Hello mike,
> I have looked on http://debian-multimedia.fx-services.com
Doesn't look right to me, try; http://www.debian-multimedia.org/
> And can not find a gpg key for it. Can someone help in this
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:44:01 -0600, mike cutie and maia wrote:
> I have looked on http://debian-multimedia.fx-services.com
>
> And can not find a gpg key for it. Can someone help in this matter.
>
> I am using debian sid 64
You mean this? :-?
http://debian-multimedia.fx-service
On Du, 06 mar 11, 09:44:01, mike cutie and maia wrote:
> Hi al,
>
> I have looked on http://debian-multimedia.fx-services.com
>
> And can not find a gpg key for it. Can someone help in this matter.
Looks like a mirror for http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ so just follow
the in
Hi al,
I have looked on http://debian-multimedia.fx-services.com
And can not find a gpg key for it. Can someone help in this matter.
I am using debian sid 64
Thanks much
mike
Shit...
While I was continue to read the message sin my mailfolder
I found the answer in another message: onak
Stay only, how do I sync my Key-Sever with the ublic ones and how much
disk space do I need=?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Hello,
last weekend I have again created a Debian Package for my customers
which correct the user settings in gnupg (keysever) on all FileServers
(nfs:/home) because the previosly kesever does not more exist...
ON, now I want to know, HOW to install my own Key-Server which is
exclu
Hi,
Does anyone know OCR friendly fonts.
I am trying to print things like gnupg keys and recover it by OCR.
It has to be fixed width font.
(Experiment was done via PDF(OOffice)->graphic(Gimp). gocr was usable
but tesseract was not at first try.)
Bitstream was best but F was converted to f.
Co
On Sun February 24 2008 10:59:52 am Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I just remembered to download the debian-keyring package and should have
> done that earlier. It seems to have a pgp key in it for debian multimedia
> too.
debian-multimedia-keyring is the one you need for the debian-multimedia.org
multi
I just remembered to download the debian-keyring package and should have
done that earlier. It seems to have a pgp key in it for debian multimedia
too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this is David Downey or you know David Downey, please call John
Hacker at (904) 759-2765 or (800) 499-2502 ASAP. Thanks so much for
your time. We miss you, and just want to see what's up and how
you're doing. Might have something right up your alley, but none the
less would love to sa
Hello
L.V.Gandhi (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You can get official debian keys from the debian-archive-keyring
>> package. Never just download keys from some gpg server just because
>> someone tells you some key id, only get the keys fr
Hello
L.V.Gandhi (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The first time you tried to export the key from gpg to apt, but you
>> didn't have the key in your gpg keyring. The second time, you
>> imported the key to gpg, but didn't feed it to apt.
>
On 2/9/06, Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can get official debian keys from the debian-archive-keyring
> package. Never just download keys from some gpg server just because
> someone tells you some key id, only get the keys from the project
> servers directly, or at least get the
On 2/9/06, Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first time you tried to export the key from gpg to apt, but you
> didn't have the key in your gpg keyring. The second time, you imported
> the key to gpg, but didn't feed it to apt.
Thanks Andreas. Clear explanation.
How to get keys for
rning during apt-get update. then I tried
> lvgdell600m:~# gpg --keyserver hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys
> 1F41B907 gpg: requesting key 1F41B907 from hkp server
> wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
> gpg: key 1F41B907: public key "Christian Mar
/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
> gpg: key 1F41B907: public key "Christian Marillat
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
> gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg: imported: 1
> even now I got warning during apt-get updat
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:21:16PM +, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
> How to get and sign gpg keys for http://www.backports.org
If you need the backports key, try
gpg --recv-keys 16BA136C
gpg --export |apt-key add -
Found at
http://lists.backports.org/lurker/message/20051219.231854.feae4c8a.en.html
si
How to get and sign gpg keys for http://www.backports.org
--
L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/
linux user No.205042
ted
gpg: WARNING: nothing exported
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
even then I got warning during apt-get update. then I tried
lvgdell600m:~# gpg --keyserver hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 1F41B907
gpg: requesting key 1F41B907 from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg:
On 2/5/06, Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you run apt-get update?
Thanks. That hit the point.
>Also check where the package comes from
> (apt-cache policy debtags adept libtdb1).
lvgdell600m:~# apt-cache policy debtags adept libtdb1
debtags:
Installed: 1.5.2+b2
Candidate: 1
Hello
L.V.Gandhi (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> [...]
> lvgdell600m:~# apt-key update
> [GPG keys succesfully imported]
>
> However after this I tried to install adept, I got error once again as
> below. vgdell600m:~# apt-get install adept
> [...]
> WARNING: The following packages cannot be auth
archive-keyring
2006.01.18 [6050B]
Fetched 6050B in 0s (8054B/s)
Selecting previously deselected package debian-archive-keyring.
(Reading database ... 85565 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking debian-archive-keyring (from
.../debian-archive-keyring_2006.01.18_all.deb) ...
Setti
Hello
L.V.Gandhi (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have dell inspiron 600m. today I have loaded base sarge and upgraded
> to unstable. I wanted to avoid the error
> Install these packages without verification.
> Hence as per info in debian-admin site I did as follows.
>
> apt-get install gnupg
>
I have dell inspiron 600m. today I have loaded base sarge and upgraded
to unstable. I wanted to avoid the error
Install these packages without verification.
Hence as per info in debian-admin site I did as follows.
apt-get install gnupg
Once that's done you can either download the public key by ru
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:57:54AM -0600, Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I make an apt-get update I get an error concerning a gpg key:
>
>
> W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
> signatures were invalid: BADSIG F1D53D8C4F
Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
>Yesterday I didnt have this problem.
>
>
Ask google,.. view the archieve.
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
When I make an apt-get update I get an error concerning a gpg key:
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures were invalid: BADSIG F1D53D8C4F368D5D Debian Archive
Automatic Signing Key (2005) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
W: You may want to run apt-get upd
hello
i have create a gpg key for my address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for very hight traffic i have create this account for debian)
but [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my main address.
so should i use edit key and adduid [EMAIL PROTECTED] to my gpg --key
to join http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
(i
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:03:40AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello Brian!
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:45:16PM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> >Automatic key retrieval is nice, however it also makes for very slow
> >mail reading if it's done inside of mutt.
> >
> >Has anyone set up procmail
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 07:34:54AM +0100, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Friday 05 December 2003 04:13, David wrote:
> > I have nothing whatsoever mentioning
> > auto-key-retrieve on the stable system. I've diffed the
> > corresponding ~/.muttrc's, /etc/Muttrc's and
On Friday 05 December 2003 04:13, David wrote:
> I have nothing whatsoever mentioning
> auto-key-retrieve on the stable system. I've diffed the
> corresponding ~/.muttrc's, /etc/Muttrc's and ~/.gnupg/options and
> cannot find anything that would account for the different
> behaviors.
Well, I don't
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 08:49:01PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
>
> You can import keys manually just like
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 8DE4D38E
> for Karsten's key.
>
> If you want to have it done automatically one way is to enable a
> keyserver in your .gnupg/pgp.conf and enable
> k
Hello Brian!
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:45:16PM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
Automatic key retrieval is nice, however it also makes for very slow
mail reading if it's done inside of mutt.
Has anyone set up procmail to prefetch unknown keys automatically? I
thought I remembered some mention of thi
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 08:49:01PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
>
> You can import keys manually just like
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 8DE4D38E
> for Karsten's key.
>
> If you want to have it done automatically one way is to enable a
> keyserver in your .gnupg/pgp.conf and enable
> k
I've decided it's time to start signing mail again...
Note that this is a general purpose, eternal key (my old key expired
April of this year). I extended it by one day from today to sign my
current key (inconsistent handling of expiry date modifications of keys
makes this impractical in a genera
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Op di 11-02-2003, om 01:38 schreef Joey Hess:
> > Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > > I only have 1 key pair. When i read the gpg manual it didn't suggest to
> > > keep more than 1 key pair ( or i didn't see it). I always thought you
> > > where only supposed to have 1 key pai
Op di 11-02-2003, om 01:38 schreef Joey Hess:
> Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > I only have 1 key pair. When i read the gpg manual it didn't suggest to
> > keep more than 1 key pair ( or i didn't see it). I always thought you
> > where only supposed to have 1 key pair? Or maybe a second one for
> > in
Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > quintuple-agent, the new gpg-agent is supposed to be better but is not
> > in deban yet.
>
> I've never used it, but is this the same one you're talking about?
>
> doozer:~% apt-cache policy quintuple-agent
No, it's gpg-agent that is not in debian yet. Probably should hav
Op ma 10-02-2003, om 04:29 schreef Scott Henson:
> On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 18:53, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > I didn't think about that. I'm using Ximian Evolution 1.2.2.
>
> Im using evolution and it automagically takes care of that. Just click
> the button telling it to remember the passphrase w
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030210 08:46]:
> Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > is it possible (like with ssh) to have gpg ony ask you your passphrase
> > once and then remember it for the duration of a session?
> > This would be handy if one is writing a lot of emails and you don't want
> > to both
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> is it possible (like with ssh) to have gpg ony ask you your passphrase
> once and then remember it for the duration of a session?
> This would be handy if one is writing a lot of emails and you don't want
> to bother every single time to type your passphrase.
> I chose qu
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 18:53, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> I didn't think about that. I'm using Ximian Evolution 1.2.2.
Im using evolution and it automagically takes care of that. Just click
the button telling it to remember the passphrase when you type it in.
--
Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Op ma 10-02-2003, om 00:38 schreef Mark Zimmerman:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 11:57:06PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible (like with ssh) to have gpg ony ask you your passphrase
> > once and then remember it for the duration of a session?
> > This would be handy if one
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 11:57:06PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible (like with ssh) to have gpg ony ask you your passphrase
> once and then remember it for the duration of a session?
> This would be handy if one is writing a lot of emails and you don't want
> to bother ever
Quoting Benedict Verheyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible (like with ssh) to have gpg ony ask you your passphrase
> once and then remember it for the duration of a session?
> This would be handy if one is writing a lot of emails and you don't want
> to bother every single time to typ
Hi,
is it possible (like with ssh) to have gpg ony ask you your passphrase
once and then remember it for the duration of a session?
This would be handy if one is writing a lot of emails and you don't want
to bother every single time to type your passphrase.
I chose quit a long and difficult passph
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:32:01PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:22:40PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Robert L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1327 -0500]:
> > > If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone
> > > know the fix
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:22:40PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robert L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1327 -0500]:
> > If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone
> > know the fix for this? I've poked around and prodded the options in
> > my mu
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:27:46PM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone
> know the fix for this? I've poked around and prodded the options in
> my muttrc and no-luck. It's not just Martin, anyone who's ID I don't
> have on my rin
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hey all,
>
> so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was
> quite a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged
> something like a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously,
> when i had signed keys with close friends, we'
Bingo, but had to move ".gnupg/options to .gnupg/gpg.conf" of course.
Thanks.
Thus spake martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:22:40 -0500
> From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: gpg k
also sprach Robert L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1327 -0500]:
> If I don't though, gpg won't go look it up. Is this normal? Anyone
> know the fix for this? I've poked around and prodded the options in
> my muttrc and no-luck. It's not just Martin, anyone who's ID I don't
> have o
not just Martin, anyone who's ID I don't
have on my ring already.
Robert
Thus spake martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:01:06 -0500
> From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: gpg key signing pro
also sprach sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.11.07.1134 -0500]:
> so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was quite
> a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged something like
> a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously, when i had
> signed keys with clo
> hey all,
>
> so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was
> quite a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged
> something like a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously,
> when i had signed keys with close friends, we'd just end up doing a
> bunch of gpg --s
hey all,
so last night at the LISA 2002 conference in philly there was
quite a nice keysigning get-together, at which i exchanged
something like a dozen or two keys with other folks. now previously,
when i had signed keys with close friends, we'd just end up doing a
bunch of gpg --sendkeys and gp
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Also, it looks like I can "send" my key to "keyring.debian.org" but I can
> not "recv". Maybe I have to wait CRON but... (I am not a Debian
> developer)
keyring.debian.org is only for registered Debian developers. However, I am
supposed to get my butt in
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 04:04:52PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > What is the remedy? Any pointer to information will be nice.
>
> There is none.
Sad :( ...
> I gave up the entire pgp.net keyserver system, and since I loathe the
> non-DFSG-c
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> What is the remedy? Any pointer to information will be nice.
There is none. One could get the keyserver software, and fix it (good luck,
that thing is NOT easy to grok), then waste a few days of machine cicles
purging all screwed up keys from the keyring..
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 08:06:27AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > gpg: key D5DE453D: invalid subkey binding
>
> This is from a pgp.net keyserver?
Yes!
> If so, it has corrupted your key in the
> server because there a
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> gpg: key D5DE453D: invalid subkey binding
This is from a pgp.net keyserver? If so, it has corrupted your key in the
server because there are two subkeys. Their crap software has not been
updated in far a while.
> pub 1024D/D5DE453D created: 2000
Hi,
I am intriguesd by GPG.
$ gpg --recv-keys D5DE453D
gpg: requesting key D5DE453D from wwwkeys.pgp.net ...
gpg: key D5DE453D: invalid subkey binding
gpg: key D5DE453D: not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1
$ gpg --edit-key D5DE453D
Secret key is available
David D. W. Downey muttered:
> I have since made a new key. the **correct** gpg key is as follows
Nice try, Moriarity, but I happen to know the real David D. W. Downey.
Not only is he one of the few truly pure and beautiful people on this
planet, he has an eidolonic memory and had memorized
Hey folks,
Forgive the email. I had an accident on my machine which
wiped out my gpg keyring. Unfortuantely I had not had time
to back up the ring, thus the gpg key I've been using is
completely lost.
I have since made a new key. the **correct** gpg key
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
just to get clarity into this:
if i set an expiration date on my GPG key and collect n signatures for
this key, what do i have to do on the day of expiration to obtain a
valid key that's signed by the same n people, and how to i
redistribute this new key?
on debian-user, i notice people
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:26:09PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> my suggestion is use a different keyserver. pgp.ai.mit.edu was my
> favorite as it was quite reliable and did not use any of these
> proprietary keyservers. but its been down for days.
I agree but recently it was unreachable for s
Hello Andre,
* Andre Berger wrote:
> I've uploaded my GPG public key to www.keyserver.net some days ago. The
> key ID is 07182FBC, but you can only get the key as 0x07182FBC, or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's wrong?
Nothing is wrong.
> How do I keep people from
> besieging me to upload a key to a
er.net uses a fairly new proprietary keyserver, and it very
> > much appears to not like GnuPG keys. my GPG key is on most keyservers
> > (the ones using the tried and true free pks) but i think it still does
> > not appear on keyserver.net (i haven't checked in a few month
ey as 0x07182FBC, or
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's wrong? How do I keep people from
> > besieging me to upload a key to a key server that has already been
> > uplaoded?
>
> keyserver.net uses a fairly new proprietary keyserver, and it very
> much appears to not like GnuPG
me to upload a key to a key server that has already been
> uplaoded?
keyserver.net uses a fairly new proprietary keyserver, and it very
much appears to not like GnuPG keys. my GPG key is on most keyservers
(the ones using the tried and true free pks) but i think it still does
not appear on
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:01:52PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote:
| I've uploaded my GPG public key to www.keyserver.net some days ago. The
| key ID is 07182FBC, but you can only get the key as 0x07182FBC, or
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's wrong? How do I keep people from
| besieging me to upload a key to
I've uploaded my GPG public key to www.keyserver.net some days ago. The
key ID is 07182FBC, but you can only get the key as 0x07182FBC, or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's wrong? How do I keep people from
besieging me to upload a key to a key server that has already been
uplaoded?
Andre Berger
on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 07:01:33PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:43:37PM -0900, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:01:35PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > Question for the gallery: Is there a
on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:43:37PM -0900, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:01:35PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > My understanding is that you *can* change the expiration date, though
> > typically you wouldn't do so after the key had expired. The
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 02:01:35PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> My understanding is that you *can* change the expiration date, though
> typically you wouldn't do so after the key had expired. The change can
> be propogated through public keyservers.
the problem is most implemenatations
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> There are two general problems with a public key infrastructure:
>
> - Key distribution (the 'keyserver' line handles this).
> - Key modification updates.
See attached script. Modify it for your needs, or write a new one that isn't
such an
on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:17:43PM -0500, Mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Question for the gallery: Is there a good method for checking a local
> > keyring against a public keyserver to find updates and/or additional
> > signatures. The best I can do right now is
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Question for the gallery: Is there a good method for checking a local
> keyring against a public keyserver to find updates and/or additional
> signatures. The best I can do right now is list the key IDs I've got
> and do a 'gpg --recv-keys' to update this list.
From
on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 09:35:56AM -0600, Jorgensen, Jens ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Adam Shand wrote:
>
> > > how do i sign my new public key with my old private key?
> >
> > okay sorry to follow up my own message but i just figured it out.
> > sometimes it seems that i have to write down (or
The tools people use for sending you stuff should tell them that the key is
expired. That should encourage them not to use it. If you revoke your old key
that certainly invalidates the signature. Technically you can't change the
expire date. I mean there's nothing to stop the software from chang
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
