On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tadziu wrote:
> > i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
> > stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
> > second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
> > it working, and it'
Hi,
tadziu wrote:
> i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
> stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
> second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
> it working, and it's not performing as well as i've expected.
Re. the getting version 4.
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:25:56 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2011 2:08 AM, "jeremy jozwik" wrote:
>>
>> > Wow... I'm still with 3.0.6.
>>
>> my pc is still in 2.5
How brave! :-)
> Y'all realize this isn't really anything to brag about?
Sure, but I don't need the latest browser, just on
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/02/11 at 08:15pm, tadziu wrote:
>> i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
>> stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
>> second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
>> it work
On Jun 4, 2011 2:08 AM, "jeremy jozwik" wrote:
>
> > Wow... I'm still with 3.0.6.
>
> my pc is still in 2.5
>
Y'all realize this isn't really anything to brag about? I just hope both of
you are running noscript or just turn scripting off (preferably the later
with browsers that old). If you were
> Wow... I'm still with 3.0.6.
my pc is still in 2.5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimnO3HHNb3KJoF3zFRu6o9C6=u...@mail.gmail.com
On 20110602_222757, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:21 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> > >> If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd k
DuckDuckGo is my first choice but I have found that the results just aren't as
good as Google for technical searches. For everyday stuff they're OK.
--- On Fri, 6/3/11, alberto fuentes wrote:
From: alberto fuentes
Subject: Re: google to pull support for firefox 3,5
To: d
cks.
--- On Fri, 6/3/11, Ron Johnson wrote:
> From: Ron Johnson
> Subject: Re: google to pull support for firefox 3,5
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, June 3, 2011, 3:49 AM
>
> I've been using ever since Google decided to start
> showing site
> >> thu
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:15:11 +0200, tadziu wrote:
> i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to stable
> before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my second computer with
> squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get it working, and it's not
> performing as well as i've expe
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:38 +0200, Klaus Wolf wrote:
> Hallo together,
>
> it is not new that google or yahoo wants to see the whole world
> as a glasfish. So for surch the web I use metacrawler like the
> server of Uni Kassel www.metager.de .
>
> whish a nice day to all
>
> klaus
Thank you Kla
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:32 +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> E.g.
> http://www.ixquick.com/
> and
> http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
> can't replace Google for my needs.
>
> Have you tr
On 06/02/2011 07:31 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Arno Schuring writes:
I find DDG (http://duckduckgo.com/Duck_Duck_Go) satisfies my needs
perfectly.
Requires Javascript. Google doesn't.
I've been using ever since Google decided to start showing site
thumbnails on mouseover events.
I've never se
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> E.g.
> http://www.ixquick.com/
> and
> http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
> can't replace Google for my needs.
>
Have you tried http://duckduckgo.com/
They say they do not track and results are pretty nice. I followed the guy
for a w
On 06/03/11 at 02:01am, Arno Schuring wrote:
> This is almost getting O/T, but anyways...
>
> Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net on 2011-06-02 21:49 +0200):
> > Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
> > Google's search engine.
> Like you said, it depends on what yo
Arno Schuring writes:
> I find DDG (http://duckduckgo.com/Duck_Duck_Go) satisfies my needs
> perfectly.
Requires Javascript. Google doesn't.
> I've been using ever since Google decided to start showing site
> thumbnails on mouseover events.
I've never seen those.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBS
This is almost getting O/T, but anyways...
Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net on 2011-06-02 21:49 +0200):
> Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
> Google's search engine.
Like you said, it depends on what you use it for. I find DDG
(http://duckduckgo.com/Duck_Duck
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:32 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/02/11 at 10:21pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> > > On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
> > > > Go
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:27 PM, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/02/11 at 08:15pm, tadziu wrote:
>> i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
>> stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
>> second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
>> it work
>
> I explicitly stated that I use plain HTML. I'm sure none of the fancy
> javascript crap will keep working, which points out the foolishness of
> treating a web page like an application.
>
i fully understand your point aswell as atitude towards web apps. but
mind two cases:
first: (not partic
On Jun 2, 2011 4:54 PM, "tadziu" wrote:
>
> >
> > As I said, it works even in IE5. I just lie and say I'm using a
'supported' browser. the js-free version of gmail is a simple site.
> >
> >
>
> implying that i'd like to use gmail in plain html, but i dont. are you
> shure that
> i'll preserve my c
On 06/02/11 at 10:54pm, tadziu wrote:
> >
> > As I said, it works even in IE5. I just lie and say I'm using a 'supported'
> > browser. the js-free version of gmail is a simple site.
> >
> >
>
> implying that i'd like to use gmail in plain html, but i dont. are you
> shure that
> i'll preserve my
>
> As I said, it works even in IE5. I just lie and say I'm using a 'supported'
> browser. the js-free version of gmail is a simple site.
>
>
implying that i'd like to use gmail in plain html, but i dont. are you
shure that
i'll preserve my current gmail functionality when i'll use your
workaroun
On 06/02/11 at 10:21pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> > On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
> > > Google's search engine.
> > >
> > > E.g.
> > > http://www.ixquick.com
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:21 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> >> If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
> >> make sense. If. There's something called g
On 06/02/11 at 10:17pm, tadziu wrote:
> > Perhaps gmail desktop alerts shouldn't work, and you would be advised to
> > upgrade if you wanted them, but gmail as a whole should continue working.
> > ...as should all other google 'apps'...
> >
>
> i doubt that. i failed to change google account sett
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
>> If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
>> make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
>> does "force" people to buy newer hardw
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
> On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
> > Google's search engine.
> >
> > E.g.
> > http://www.ixquick.com/
> > and
> > http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
> Perhaps gmail desktop alerts shouldn't work, and you would be advised to
> upgrade if you wanted them, but gmail as a whole should continue working.
> ...as should all other google 'apps'...
>
i doubt that. i failed to change google account settings with ff3,5. just got
information that my brow
On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
> Google's search engine.
>
> E.g.
> http://www.ixquick.com/
> and
> http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
> can't replace Google for my needs.
Scroogle IS google. So.. not a great
On 06/02/11 at 03:56pm, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2011 3:35 PM, "Nuno Magalhães" wrote:
> >
> > If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
> > make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
> > does "force" people to buy newer hardware. How green
On Jun 2, 2011 3:35 PM, "Nuno Magalhães" wrote:
>
> If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
> make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
> does "force" people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc.
> Reminds me to start migrating away f
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
> make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
> does "force" people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc.
> Reminds me to start migrating
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
does "force" people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc.
Reminds me to start migrating away from their products and start
treating them as Microsoft's.
On 06/02/11 at 08:15pm, tadziu wrote:
> i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
> stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
> second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
> it working, and it's not performing as well as i've expected.
>
>
>
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
it working, and it's not performing as well as i've expected.
http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/01/google-apps-to-pul
36 matches
Mail list logo
