Le 23.10.2013 15:16, Linux-Fan a écrit :
On 10/23/2013 02:50 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 23.10.2013 14:36, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:45:55 +0200
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:16 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I thin
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>
> I got very frustrated about Webkit (Midori uses Webkit). I found enormous
> number
> of bugs in CVE list, but most of them were related to products that use
> Webkit such
> as Google Chrome, I should determine if they originated from
On 10/23/2013 02:50 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 23.10.2013 14:36, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:45:55 +0200
>> Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:16 +0200
>>> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think that midori is stil
Le 23.10.2013 14:36, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:45:55 +0200
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:16 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I think that midori is still maintained?
Never heard of it, except in Debian repo, anyway I'll give it a try.
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:45:55 +0200
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:16 +0200
> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> > I think that midori is still maintained?
>
> Never heard of it, except in Debian repo, anyway I'll give it a try.
>
> Thanks
>
>
I got very frustrate
Le 17.10.2013 20:45, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:16 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
I think that midori is still maintained?
Never heard of it, except in Debian repo, anyway I'll give it a try.
Thanks
It is a relatively young one, still maintained, re
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:16 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I think that midori is still maintained?
Never heard of it, except in Debian repo, anyway I'll give it a try.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On 10/17/2013 04:00 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> 1: In fact, I think that meta-packages should only have recommendations and
>> suggestions, since they are automatically installed by a default Debian
>> configuration.
>
> I agree that Debian's dependency management would benefit from some
> extra
This has been fixed in stable and is pending in sid, I believe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131017155522.ga11...@bryant.redmars.org
Le 17.10.2013 17:38, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:43:32 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I was curious so I investigated. The dependency was added in this
commit¹ with the message "Require firefox extensions that match
epiphany
functionality: keyring, adblock." Looking a
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:43:32 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was curious so I investigated. The dependency was added in this
> commit¹ with the message "Require firefox extensions that match epiphany
> functionality: keyring, adblock." Looking at the commit log, an earlier
> commit sheds some
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:48:28AM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> 1: In fact, I think that meta-packages should only have
> recommendations and suggestions, since they are automatically
> installed by a default Debian configuration.
All meta-packages are not installed in a default D
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 03:03:19AM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> gnome depends on xul-ext-adblock-plus.
…
> So, I would like to know if someone knows why this dependency
> exists, instead of a recommendation or suggestion.
I was curious so I investigated. The dependency was added i
> 1: In fact, I think that meta-packages should only have recommendations and
> suggestions, since they are automatically installed by a default Debian
> configuration.
I agree that Debian's dependency management would benefit from some
extra refinements. The above suggestion is not quite suffici
Le 12.10.2013 10:58, Marko Randjelovic a écrit :
"One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring
them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where
the
Shadows lie." :)
apt-get install gnome-applets gnome-screenshot gnome-session
gnome-panel gnome-termina
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 10:58 +0200, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> apt-get install gnome-applets gnome-screenshot gnome-session
> gnome-panel gnome-terminal gedit gdm3 file-roller gnome-icon-theme
After running that apt-get command, there still would be a meta-package
available by the repositories, tha
"One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie." :)
apt-get install gnome-applets gnome-screenshot gnome-session gnome-panel
gnome-terminal gedit gdm3 file-roller gnome-icon-theme
--
To UN
Well, as I claimed more than once here, I am not a DE user, but I have
read today something ( on linuxfr ) which surprise me a lot, and it seem
that reading is true, from : gnome depends on xul-ext-adblock-plus.
I always thought that dependencies were here for technical reasons, and
I can not
18 matches
Mail list logo
