-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
thanks for the input already - I found a thread yesterday that solved
the problem :
apparently, because of Mozilla suite stuff (Firefox, Thunderbird,
Sunbird etc) being maintained cross platform, it cannot hook into the
default settings from the
Frank Guthorel wrote:
However - printing from Mozilla apps like Firefox webpages or
Thunderbird mails does not seem to work any more, since the upgrade to
gnome 2.10.2 ? I don't get any error messages or so, just the normal
statement that job is being sent to printer etc., 100%, done - but the
p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just moved my desktop to gnome 2.10.2 on my machine running 2.6.14 in
unstable.
My network printer which is available over IPP on a dedicated internal
network address, is still able to print test pages, from the CUPS web
interface running on lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
> I recently (the last several days) had my Debian menu disappear from my
> GNOME Applications menu. I checked for bug reports against menu,
> gnome-menus, and others but nothing looks like. Didn't see anyone else
> report the is
Hello Alexandru!
> Is it possible to make sticky notes stay behind the open windows, like
> part of the background?
You can use the sticky notes for gdesklets. They are in the background.
Is this what you mean?
CU
Michael
--
Hi All!
Is it possible to make sticky notes stay behind the open windows, like
part of the background?
--
Sincerely yours,
Alexandru Cardaniuc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i drag a launcher icon on the top panel to re-place it,
and it just gone when i released the mouse button,
what amazing!
gnome 2.10.2
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 22:34 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:27:07AM -0400, David Clymer wrote:
> > Perhaps he's saying 'apt-get' and meaning 'dpkg'
>
> Thank you, but unlike most users of unstable today, I do actually know the
> difference between the two.
To be honest, I f
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:27:07AM -0400, David Clymer wrote:
> Perhaps he's saying 'apt-get' and meaning 'dpkg'
Thank you, but unlike most users of unstable today, I do actually know the
difference between the two.
I also know the difference between a low-level tool written as a
demonstration of
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 23:17 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 20:56 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 13 September 2005 2:16 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> > Regarding package managers... apt-get isn't a
If you want to keep the packages installed to satisfy dependencies while
using aptitude you can
1) mark the package you want to remove and press 'g' as usual.
2) Now you should have a listing the packages that will be removed.
3) Mark the ones you want keep ('+'), then press 'q'.
4) You're
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:17:23PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:16PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> > er .. a little question. What packages will be removed if I remove gnome
> > and gnome-desktop-environment. I am guessing since there are
> > metapackages, nothing else will be r
Apparently, _Marc Wilson_, on 16/09/05 02:17,typed:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:16PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
>>er .. a little question. What packages will be removed if I remove gnome
>>and gnome-desktop-environment. I am guessing since there are
>>metapackages, nothing else will be removed.
>
>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:13:16PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> er .. a little question. What packages will be removed if I remove gnome
> and gnome-desktop-environment. I am guessing since there are
> metapackages, nothing else will be removed.
Nothing *should* be removed, although apparently if you use
ptic most of the
time, and sometimes apt-get directly when Synaptic won't let me force
more than one package at a time to come from unstable. But I still
can't upgrade to GNOME 2.10 (all of it; I have some parts of it from
2.10) because of sound-juicer. *sigh*
On 14/09/05, Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I don't know if he's trolling.
> He comes across as someone who uses one app. and therefore nothing else
> is any good.
>
> I've used aptitude for a couple of years now, on dial-up, go to bed on
> the upgrade, wake up in the morning, and every
Apparently, _H.S._, on 15/09/05 12:38,typed:
> So what's keeping sound juicer from coming into Etch? I mean, how come
> it is still not there? Looks like there are some issues with Etch and
> Gnome 2.10 that the Debian team is still trying to resolve.
>
> I wonder what mad
So what's keeping sound juicer from coming into Etch? I mean, how come
it is still not there? Looks like there are some issues with Etch and
Gnome 2.10 that the Debian team is still trying to resolve.
I wonder what made them release Gnome 2.10 without sound juicer, or was
it an oversight?
Hello List,
I have just tried to ply my favorite CDROM with gnome-cd:
I get the error message:
OSS device "/dev/dsp" is already in use by another program.
My box is a daily update Etch box:
CDROM can be plyed before Gnome 2.10 hit testing ?
Any clue ?
Thanks in advance,
Jero
Katipo wrote:
> I've used aptitude for a couple of years now, on dial-up, go to bed on
> the upgrade, wake up in the morning, and everything's done.
> Must be something wrong with me.
Well, obviously! What self-respecting geek wakes up in the _morning_?!
Well, okay, I guess 11AM is still consid
Jason Clinton wrote:
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 10:43 pm, Marc Wilson wrote:
I'm not feeding this troll any more.
Well, I don't know if he's trolling.
He comes across as someone who uses one app. and therefore nothing else
is any good.
I've used aptitude for a couple of years now, on
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 10:43 pm, Marc Wilson wrote:
I'm not feeding this troll any more.
--
I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu key
ID code: "0x8DB3BF09". F: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09
pgpQguMjXvX5E.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 20:56 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 September 2005 2:16 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> Regarding package managers... apt-get isn't a package manager, has never
> been billed as a package manager, a
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 September 2005 2:16 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > That's why "we" don't like aptitude. It too aggressively removes
> > things.
>
> Would the almighty Debian Gods decide which fraking package manager 'we' are
> supposed t
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> Unless unstable happens to be going through an ABI change and you don't want
> to babysit upgrades.
Oh, that explains everything. You're one of those "turn the tools loose
blindly and worry about what they've done after they've don
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:28:46AM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 September 2005 12:21 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > Because the whole reason the "gnome-desktop-environment" *meta-package*
> > exists is to give you a complete Gnome. Not Gnome minus whatever *this*
> > cluebie doesn't lik
Seeker5528 wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:54:32 -0700
>Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Rats, it's happened again. An upgrade clobbered my custom Gnome menus
>>and there's no visible way to add them back in. Nautilus no longer has a
>>location bar where you can enter applications:/
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:54:32 -0700
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rats, it's happened again. An upgrade clobbered my custom Gnome menus
> and there's no visible way to add them back in. Nautilus no longer has a
> location bar where you can enter applications:///.
I have not tried it, bu
> # apt-get remove sound-juicer
>
> According to the dep tree, it's only because you have not installed g-d-e.
Absolutely!
> > > Because stable is too old for a desktop. And unstable is too new for a
> > > desktop. Testing is just right (usually).
> >
> >
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 2:16 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> That's why "we" don't like aptitude. It too aggressively removes
> things.
Would the almighty Debian Gods decide which fraking package manager 'we' are
supposed to use? I have seem countless times on this list that apt-get is
deprecated
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:28 -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 September 2005 12:21 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > Because the whole reason the "gnome-desktop-environment" *meta-package*
> > exists is to give you a complete Gnome. Not Gnome minus whatever *this*
> > cluebie doesn't like, what
Hello all,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:34:18AM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
> And actually it seems that someone made a mistake; according to this [0], the
> sound-juicer should have fallen in to testing but someone missed it:
It's more like sound-juicer has been left out deliberately, please see
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 12:21 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Because the whole reason the "gnome-desktop-environment" *meta-package*
> exists is to give you a complete Gnome. Not Gnome minus whatever *this*
> cluebie doesn't like, whatever *that* cluebie doesn't like, etc.
And actually it seems th
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 12:21 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Because the whole reason the "gnome-desktop-environment" *meta-package*
> exists is to give you a complete Gnome. Not Gnome minus whatever *this*
> cluebie doesn't like, whatever *that* cluebie doesn't like, etc.
>
> If you don't like wha
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:21:21PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:46:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 9/12/05, H. S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Neither can I. gnomeo-desktop-environment depends upon sound-juicer >
> > > 2.10.1. And such a sound-juicer doesn
Mark Crean wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:21 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
>
>> Because the whole reason the "gnome-desktop-environment" *meta-package*
>>
>>exists is to give you a complete Gnome. Not Gnome minus whatever *this*
>>cluebie doesn't like, whatever *that* cluebie doesn't like, etc.
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:21 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:46:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 9/12/05, H. S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Neither can I. gnomeo-desktop-environment depends upon sound-juicer >
> > > 2.10.1. And such a sound-juicer doesn't exis
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:15:21AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> is there any Gnome 2.10 applet to check IMAP mail box ?
>
I don't believe that there is - at least not an official one.
But you can use mail-notification. This uses the gnome2 system tray and
Hello List,
is there any Gnome 2.10 applet to check IMAP mail box ?
Thanks,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 19:08 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> or is it because of the Debian Perfect way
> of thinking?
Exactly :-)
--
Glenn English
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG ID: D0D7FF20
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:46:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 9/12/05, H. S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Neither can I. gnomeo-desktop-environment depends upon sound-juicer >
> > 2.10.1. And such a sound-juicer doesn't exist in Debian Testing at present.
>
> And this begs the questio
On 9/12/05, H. S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neither can I. gnomeo-desktop-environment depends upon sound-juicer >
> 2.10.1. And such a sound-juicer doesn't exist in Debian Testing at present.
And this begs the question, why does gnome-desktop-environment
*depend* on something like sound-juicer
On 9/12/05, Jason Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 12 September 2005 8:15 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:> I can't install it... Everything is there except sound-juicer (>=> 2.10.1) which gnome-desktop-environment depends upon. Is this a bug?> Has anyone managed a way around this? Or is it m
On Monday 12 September 2005 8:15 pm, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> I can't install it... Everything is there except sound-juicer (>=
> 2.10.1) which gnome-desktop-environment depends upon. Is this a bug?
> Has anyone managed a way around this? Or is it me?
I have the same problem. It looks like tomorro
Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 16:38 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:48:44PM -0400, Colin wrote:
Jason Clinton wrote:
Around 10:30 UTC, all the mirrors should have Gnome 2.10 on them.
Great. When will they have Gnome 2.12
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 16:38 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:48:44PM -0400, Colin wrote:
> > Jason Clinton wrote:
> > > Around 10:30 UTC, all the mirrors should have Gnome 2.10 on them.
> >
> > Great. When will they have Gnome 2.12?
>
>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:48:44PM -0400, Colin wrote:
> Jason Clinton wrote:
> > Around 10:30 UTC, all the mirrors should have Gnome 2.10 on them.
>
> Great. When will they have Gnome 2.12?
Gee, sometime after unstable has it, wouldn't you think?
Yet another "I
Jason Clinton wrote:
> Around 10:30 UTC, all the mirrors should have Gnome 2.10 on them.
Great. When will they have Gnome 2.12?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e list shows that editing menus has gone away in gnome 2.10.
> When is this ability expected to be resurrected?
>
> That same message indicated that menu items can be added to
> ~/.local/share/applications. I managed to recreate some menu items by
> following the examples in /usr/s
Around 10:30 UTC, all the mirrors should have Gnome 2.10 on them.
--
I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu key
ID code: "0x8DB3BF09". F: F628 D9D3 E57A C281 5EFE 7DF7 B52A A393 8DB3 BF09
pgp9TSC7oqURL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Rats, it's happened again. An upgrade clobbered my custom Gnome menus
and there's no visible way to add them back in. Nautilus no longer has a
location bar where you can enter applications:///.
Searching the list shows that editing menus has gone away in gnome 2.10.
When is this abilit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I recently (the last several days) had my Debian menu disappear from my
GNOME Applications menu. I checked for bug reports against menu,
gnome-menus, and others but nothing looks like. Didn't see anyone else
report the issue in the mailing lists, eit
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 03:29 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Debian has a development cycle.
[snip]
Thanks for your reply. I guess I was a bit overexcited at having an
excellent Debian system running well here! Will try to exercise some
patience, then.
:)
Fish
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 05:39:10PM +0100, Mark Crean wrote:
> Hi
>
> I recently installed Debian testing. However, I wonder if there is a way
> to upgrade from Gnome 2.8 to Gnome 2.10 without have to dist-upgrade the
> whole shebang to unstable? I am fairly new to Debian and
Mark Crean wrote:
Hi
I recently installed Debian testing. However, I wonder if there is a way
to upgrade from Gnome 2.8 to Gnome 2.10 without have to dist-upgrade the
whole shebang to unstable? I am fairly new to Debian and stability does
matter to a degree - for example, I have spent ages
Hi
I recently installed Debian testing. However, I wonder if there is a way
to upgrade from Gnome 2.8 to Gnome 2.10 without have to dist-upgrade the
whole shebang to unstable? I am fairly new to Debian and stability does
matter to a degree - for example, I have spent ages setting up
exim4/cyrus
Hi,
i'm currently running Sid using KDE 3.4.1 from experimental and kdm.
Whenever i try to access X using Gnome my system stuck when it comes to
load the horizontal top and bottom bar of gnome 2.10. Does anybody can
diagnose this problem or even has it?
Thanks,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
i'm currently running Sid using KDE 3.4.1 from experimental and kdm.
Whenever i try to access X using Gnome my system stuck when it comes to
load the horizontal top and bottom bar of gnome 2.10. Does anybody can
diagnose this problem or even has it?
Thanks,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
ce of the bash profile
file, but the first edit was not good and I haven't checked it after that.
Stoyan
David Roguin wrote:
I have eclipse 3.0 installed in my debian sid; it always worked great,
but now after installed gnome 2.10 from experimental, eclipse fail to
start up.
It shows an ug
I have eclipse 3.0 installed in my debian sid; it always worked great,
but now after installed gnome 2.10 from experimental, eclipse fail to
start up.
It shows an ugly window with that:
JVM terminated. Exit code=1
/usr/bin/java
-cp /usr/local/eclipse/startup.jar org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main
David Roguin wrote:
i've found it using the gconf editor.
thanks.
Hi, glad the problem is solved. You mailed me personally three times
though - no need, I'm on the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Dowland wrote:
> David Roguin wrote:
>
>> i've recently installed gnome 2.10 from experimental and i don't want
>> to have the Trash Can in my desktop any more (like i've seen its the
>> default to 2.10) but i can't remove it.
>>
>> any
David Roguin wrote:
i've recently installed gnome 2.10 from experimental and i don't want
to have the Trash Can in my desktop any more (like i've seen its the
default to 2.10) but i can't remove it.
any ideas?
What method have you used to try and remove it?
--
To UNSUBSCR
David Roguin wrote:
Hi list.
I recently installed gnome with the experimental sources
Everything is OK! (what else do you expect?)
but, the menu now it's a lot bigger and have kde stuff with it; this
wasn't like this in gnome 2.8.
any ideas?
Sounds like a good idea to me! I wish that GNOME/KDE used
Hello.
i've recently installed gnome 2.10 from experimental and i don't want
to have the Trash Can in my desktop any more (like i've seen its the
default to 2.10) but i can't remove it.
any ideas?
thanks in advance
Hi list.
I recently installed gnome with the experimental sources
Everything is OK! (what else do you expect?)
but, the menu now it's a lot bigger and have kde stuff with it; this
wasn't like this in gnome 2.8.
any ideas?
66 matches
Mail list logo
