default, so if you upgrade from Squeeze to Wheezy to
>> Jessie, you would see something approximately like your subject line
>> (GNOME 2 to GNOME 3 to Xfce), but that's not what your description
>> said.
>
> Can you show us the dependency tree that'll change a
essie, you would see something approximately like your subject line
> (GNOME 2 to GNOME 3 to Xfce), but that's not what your description
> said.
Can you show us the dependency tree that'll change a DE from Gnome to
XFCE when you upgrade fro wheezy to jessie?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 06/09/2014 11:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>>> I just reinstalled Deby with the 7.5.0 DVD release and what was my surprise
>>> to fall back on Gnome 2 look alike ? No more vertical desktops, no more
>>> do
ce by default, so if you upgrade from Squeeze to Wheezy to
>> Jessie, you would see something approximately like your subject line
>> (GNOME 2 to GNOME 3 to Xfce), but that's not what your description
>> said.
>
> I seriously doubt existing Gnome installation will be migr
would see something approximately like your subject line
> (GNOME 2 to GNOME 3 to Xfce), but that's not what your description
> said.
I seriously doubt existing Gnome installation will be migrated to Xfce,
even if Xfce stays the default for the Jessie release.
Kind regards,
An
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>> I just reinstalled Deby with the 7.5.0 DVD release and what was my surprise
>> to fall back on Gnome 2 look alike ? No more vertical desktops, no more
>> docks on the sides ??
>>
>> My details in system setting
> I just reinstalled Deby with the 7.5.0 DVD release and what was my surprise
> to fall back on Gnome 2 look alike ? No more vertical desktops, no more
> docks on the sides ??
>
> My details in system settings show Gnome 3.4.2, and either I log into
> Gnome,
> Gnome Classic
Hi,
I know everyone is a bit tense nowadays so I really don't want to
bother anyone but reposting this but.. As I said before :
I just reinstalled Deby with the 7.5.0 DVD release and what was my surprise
to fall back on Gnome 2 look alike ? No more vertical desktops, no more
docks on the
>> Have you consulted the Debian Reference Manual before you posted your
>> question here?
>>
>> Don't be another Horatio.
>>
>>
>> Jerry S.
>
> Warning - faker here. Check the email headers - this was NOT from my
> account.
Most of the time I don't even bother to respond to that kind
On 6/7/2014 9:40 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 18:10:04 +0200
> From: me_buss...@yahoo.fr
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
>
> Did I miss something ? ^^
>
Have you consulted the Debian Reference Manual b
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 18:10:04 +0200
> From: me_buss...@yahoo.fr
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Gnome 2, 3.. And then 2 ?
>
> Did I miss something ? ^^
>
Have you consulted the Debian Reference Manual before you posted your question
here?
Don
Hi,
I just reinstalled Deby with the 7.5.0 DVD release and what was my surprise
to fall back on Gnome 2 look alike ? No more vertical desktops, no more
docks on the sides ??
My details in system settings show Gnome 3.4.2, and either I log into
Gnome,
Gnome Classic or system default, I get the
David Zelinsky writes:
>>
>> For me it sounds more like a gnome3 fallback mode as whole gnome2 has
>> been replaced in testing already.
>> And if I'm correct everything is ok, those menus aren't there anymore.
>
> About GNOME (which _is_ still in the System menu) says it's 2.30. I
> might not mi
kuLa writes:
> On 22/11/11 12:10, tadziu wrote:
>> system menu is gone on both of my machines
>> after last week update. this bug seems to me
>> so absurd that i don't even know how to deal
>> with it. both apps and places menu are
>> unaffected. i can't change it with menu editor anyway.
I was
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:46:32 -0500, Stephen Allen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:24:17PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:33:08 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> > Well until then maybe GNOME 3 has evolved into a more usable state.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> It is "usable" right no
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:24:17PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:33:08 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Well until then maybe GNOME 3 has evolved into a more usable state.
>
> (...)
>
> It is "usable" right now.
>
> Current version 3.0 (the one available in testing) is not
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:33:08 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Montag, 28. November 2011 schrieb Camaleón:
(...)
>> >> Nowadays, there is no way to get GNOME2 back as it was.
>> >>
>> >> No way, but not just for Debian but any other linux distributions
>> >> (the last release of OpenBSD fea
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:36:03 +0100
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Montag, 28. November 2011 schrieb Cybe R. Wizard:
> > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:52:52 +
> >
> > Richard wrote:
> > > I was unhappy with Gnome 3 at start, but after giving it a chance
> > > I've grown to like it. for instance, AL
Am Montag, 28. November 2011 schrieb Cybe R. Wizard:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:52:52 +
>
> Richard wrote:
> > I was unhappy with Gnome 3 at start, but after giving it a chance
> > I've grown to like it. for instance, ALT Tab to move between desktop
> > is a nice feature, its less hand movement
t with fallback mode. I've now
> >> > tried xfce, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome
> >> > components.
> >> >
> >> > I don't like any of it.
> >> >
> >> > What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:52:52 +
Richard wrote:
> I was unhappy with Gnome 3 at start, but after giving it a chance
> I've grown to like it. for instance, ALT Tab to move between desktop
> is a nice feature, its less hand movement than grabbing the mouse to
> click on a window. And its not a tw
, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome
>> > components.
>> >
>> > I don't like any of it.
>> >
>> > What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
>> > wanted it, and there was nothing wrong with it.
>> >
it.
What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
wanted it, and there was nothing wrong with it.
Is there any way to get this back, while still using Debian? I've been
using Debian (sid) a long time and I'm not changing distros.
Are the debian patches for the
any of it.
> >
> > What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
> > wanted it, and there was nothing wrong with it.
> >
> > Is there any way to get this back, while still using Debian? I've been
> > using Debian (sid) a long time an
On 27/11/11 11:04, Cam Hutchison wrote:
I have tried GNOME 3. I have tried it with fallback mode. I've now tried
xfce, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome components.
I don't like any of it.
What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
wanted it,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:04:24 +, Cam Hutchison wrote:
> I have tried GNOME 3. I have tried it with fallback mode. I've now tried
> xfce, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome components.
>
> I don't like any of it.
>
> What I like is the setup I ha
> > I don't like any of it.
> >
> > What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
> > wanted it, and there was nothing wrong with it.
> >
> > Is there any way to get this back, while still using Debian? I've been
> > using
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:04:24 +, Cam Hutchison wrote:
> I have tried GNOME 3. I have tried it with fallback mode. I've now tried
> xfce, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome components.
>
> I don't like any of it.
>
> What I like is the setup I ha
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On 11/27/2011 09:04 AM, Cam Hutchison wrote:
Are the debian patches for the last of the GNOME 2 releases still
available? Can I build my own packages?
You can find packages here: http://snapshot.debian.org/ But if they are
not uninstallable already because of
Cam Hutchison wrote:
>I have tried GNOME 3. I have tried it with fallback mode. I've now tried
>xfce, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome components.
>
>I don't like any of it.
>
>What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
>w
On 11/27/2011 09:04 AM, Cam Hutchison wrote:
> Are the debian patches for the last of the GNOME 2 releases still
> available? Can I build my own packages?
You can find packages here: http://snapshot.debian.org/ But if they are
not uninstallable already because of dependency problems, the
I have tried GNOME 3. I have tried it with fallback mode. I've now tried
xfce, kde and my own hacked together xsession with gnome components.
I don't like any of it.
What I like is the setup I had. I had GNOME 2 set up just the way I
wanted it, and there was nothing wrong with it.
Is
>
> Yes, there are some gnome-extensions that make it look like gnome2, but
> not yet in testing.
>
>
well it's not just a matter of look, but functionality.
gnome 3 is pretty cool i've tested it for some time
but i really can't got used to not having 'icon view'
or parent directory button in file
2011/11/22 tadziu
>
>
>> Load the gnome-tweak-tool, that will allow you to get a similar desktop
>> to the old gnome 2.
>>
>>
> oh dear i'm really not up-to-date with changes in testing.
>
> you are telling me, that default gnome environment
editor anyway.
>
> same problem anyone? any clues?
> cheers
> /t
Load the gnome-tweak-tool, that will allow you to get a similar desktop to the
old gnome 2.
HTH
--
Best wishes / 73
Richard Bown
e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com or richard.b...@blueyonder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/11/11 12:10, tadziu wrote:
> system menu is gone on both of my machines
> after last week update. this bug seems to me
> so absurd that i don't even know how to deal
> with it. both apps and places menu are
> unaffected. i can't change it with me
system menu is gone on both of my machines
after last week update. this bug seems to me
so absurd that i don't even know how to deal
with it. both apps and places menu are
unaffected. i can't change it with menu editor anyway.
same problem anyone? any clues?
cheers
/t
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:27:54 -0800, Kevin Ross wrote:
> Why weren't the new gnome packages named with a "3" in their name, to
> allow both gnome 2 and gnome 3 to exist in the repositories, and allow
> the user to choose which one they want? After all, we had apache and
> You can make Gnome3-shell look as near as damn it like gnome2-shell
That's good news :)
> The only thing I haven't been able to do with 3 that i could do with 2 is
> right click
> on an app in the drop down menu to put a short cut of the app either on the
> desktop or the panel.
> And I haven
> You have therefore missed the posts about it on this very list. Many
> people do now use it, and support is growing. The most recent
> version, 3.10.13, was released a few days ago. (KDE3 ended at
> 3.5.10.) TDE It is unlikely ever to rival KDE4 or GNOME3, but the
> option is valuable and is
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:40:58 +0100
Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
> >> Why weren't the new gnome packages named with a "3" in their name, to allow
> >> both gnome 2 and gnome 3 to exist in the repositories, and allow the user
> >> to
> >> choos
>> Why weren't the new gnome packages named with a "3" in their name, to allow
>> both gnome 2 and gnome 3 to exist in the repositories, and allow the user to
>> choose which one they want? After all, we had apache and apache2, php4 and
>> php5, mysql4 and
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Kevin Ross wrote:
>
> Why weren't the new gnome packages named with a "3" in their name, to allow
> both gnome 2 and gnome 3 to exist in the repositories, and allow the user to
> choose which one they want? After all, we had apache a
Why weren't the new gnome packages named with a "3" in their name, to
allow both gnome 2 and gnome 3 to exist in the repositories, and allow
the user to choose which one they want? After all, we had apache and
apache2, php4 and php5, mysql4 and mysql5, etc, etc.
I'm not s
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:34:15 +0100, Arno Schuring wrote:
> Camaleón (noela...@gmail.com on 2011-11-13 17:59 +):
>>
>> > and how many people are whining because GNOME 2 is gone?
>>
>> We all miss the good job that GNOME2 did. IMO, there is nothing wrong
>>
Carlo Borelli wrote:
2011/11/13 Kevin Ross mailto:ke...@familyross.net>>
I just found some extensions that give your desktop a GNOME 2 look
and feel. I guess it's kinda like fallback mode, but fallback mode
is supposedly only temporary.
All you need to do is extra
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 23:30 -0300, Carlo Borelli wrote:
> 2011/11/13 Kevin Ross
> I just found some extensions that give your desktop a GNOME 2
> look and feel. I guess it's kinda like fallback mode, but
> fallback mode is supposed
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 01:34 +0100, Arno Schuring wrote:
> However, you can argue whether effectively discontinuing the most-used
> DE on Linux is a wise move. I can understand some of the reasoning
> behind it, but in my mind, abandoning your old product in favor of some
> fad of the day feels like
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 13:32 -0800, Kevin Ross wrote:
> I just found some extensions that give your desktop a GNOME 2 look and
> feel. I guess it's kinda like fallback mode, but fallback mode is
> supposedly only temporary.
>
> All you need to do is extract the .tgz file i
2011/11/13 Kevin Ross
> I just found some extensions that give your desktop a GNOME 2 look and
> feel. I guess it's kinda like fallback mode, but fallback mode is
> supposedly only temporary.
>
> All you need to do is extract the .tgz file into your home folder, log out
>
Camaleón (noela...@gmail.com on 2011-11-13 17:59 +):
>
> > and how many people are whining because GNOME 2 is gone?
>
> We all miss the good job that GNOME2 did. IMO, there is nothing wrong
> about users whining or complaining because of the change, that's a
> no
Selim T. Erdogan (se...@alumni.cs.utexas.edu on 2011-11-13 05:32 -0600):
> Arno Schuring, 12.11.2011:
> >
> > Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net on 2011-11-11 23:51 +0100):
> > >
> > > Before I run the upgrade I saved a backup of my GNOME 2 Debian. Is
>
I just found some extensions that give your desktop a GNOME 2 look and
feel. I guess it's kinda like fallback mode, but fallback mode is
supposedly only temporary.
All you need to do is extract the .tgz file into your home folder, log
out and log back in. Easy peasy. It's a colle
I hope gnome-shell fits my needs, at least for now I'm
okay with it.
> and how many people are whining because GNOME 2 is gone?
We all miss the good job that GNOME2 did. IMO, there is nothing wrong
about users whining or complaining because of the change, that's a normal
reaction
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: Arno Schuring
Subject: Re: GNOME 3 - Help needed - Testing upgraded from GNOME 2 to
GNOME 3
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:13:01 +0100
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 23:30 +0100, Arno Schuring wrote:
> Allow me to join the choir :)
:D
>
ut I understand that fallback mode will disapear, sooner or later.
>
Really?
How many people like GNOME 3 and how many people are whining because
GNOME 2 is gone? If they'll drop fallback mode without giving options to
configure GNOME 3 similar to GNOME 2, nearly nobody won't use G
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:35:04 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:18:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:54:43 +, Richard wrote:
>
> >> Sorry printscreen doesn't function until logged in.
> >
> > You can use a digital still camera or your cell phone's
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:06:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:57 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> I hope I can turn off all of the mutter effects (window shadows and
>> moving windows), they're really annoying.
>
> Fallback mode :p.
And when it's not available anymore, what? :-)
N
Le Sun 13/11/2011, Ralf Mardorf said
> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:16 +, Camaleón wrote:
> > > Hm? Around 10 o'clock in the morning I wasn't able to receive emails.
> >
> > It's Sunday, people is sleeping after a long journey of gnome-shell
> > tweaking :-P
>
> It was an issue by my provider, I
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:57 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I hope I can turn off all of the mutter effects (window shadows and
> moving windows), they're really annoying.
Fallback mode :p.
- Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 11:16 +, Camaleón wrote:
> > Hm? Around 10 o'clock in the morning I wasn't able to receive emails.
>
> It's Sunday, people is sleeping after a long journey of gnome-shell
> tweaking :-P
It was an issue by my provider, I got timeouts. Anyway, I need to do
additional gnom
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:18:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:54:43 +, Richard wrote:
>> Sorry printscreen doesn't function until logged in.
>
> You can use a digital still camera or your cell phone's one :-)
Or xnest
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:54:43 +, Richard wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:07:10 + (UTC) Camaleón
> wrote:
(...)
>> > But no pulldown on the login menu, any ideas how to get this added
>>
>> Let's see... at the login greeter window you have to click on your user
>> name (richard) and then
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:07:10 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:56:17 +, Richard wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:46:37 + (UTC) Camaleón
> > wrote:
>
> >> For those who can't see any other login sessions other than gnome/gnome
> >> fallback/default they should run:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:56:17 +, Richard wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:46:37 + (UTC) Camaleón
> wrote:
>> For those who can't see any other login sessions other than gnome/gnome
>> fallback/default they should run:
>>
>> ls -l /usr/share/xsessions
>>
>> To check what's there.
>>
>>
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:18:52 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> On 13/11/11 12:16, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 13:10 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Camaleón, hi
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:46:37 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:20:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:41 +, Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote:
> >> > How do you switch DM to LXDE etc, there is nothing on the log
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:20:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:41 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote:
>> > How do you switch DM to LXDE etc, there is nothing on the login pane
>> > as there used to be.
>>
>> I have TWM in the dropdown m
Arno Schuring, 12.11.2011:
>
> Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net on 2011-11-11 23:51 +0100):
> >
> > Before I run the upgrade I saved a backup of my GNOME 2 Debian. Is
> > there the need to restore Debian from the backup, or is there a way
> > to get back a
On 13/11/11 12:16, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 13:10 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>
Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :)
at the moment the fallback mode look
emove the fallback mode.
Fallback mode is aimed to deal with VGA cards that provide no hardware 3D
acceleration but if hardware 3D acceleration is not needed anymore,
what's the reason for the fallback mode? Fallback mode is not here for
the "romatincs" of GNOME2+gnome-panel :-
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:04:15 +, Cam Hutchison wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:15:42 +, Cam Hutchison wrote:
>
>>> I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock,
>>> the menu and a couple of applets.
&g
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:41 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote:
> > How do you switch DM to LXDE etc, there is nothing on the
> > login pane as there used to be.
>
> I have TWM in the dropdown menu so other desktops should be also present.
While the Login-M
e already a GNOME 3 version without fallback mode? And if so, is
there no way to configure such a GNOME 3 similar to GNOME 2?
> > This weekend might become a weekend of snapshot-backups and
restores. I
> > still haven't installed gnome-core for version 3, regarding to the
> &
Camaleón writes:
>On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:15:42 +, Cam Hutchison wrote:
>> I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock,
>> the menu and a couple of applets.
>>
>> Is this still in unstable at all? The replacement seems to be l
of sane
> users.
Empathy has a setting for that, maybe Evolution has too?
$ gsettings set org.gnome.Evolution use-conn false
>
> Before I run the upgrade I saved a backup of my GNOME 2 Debian. Is
> there the need to restore Debian from the backup, or is there a way
> to get back
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:17:01 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I think Fedora 15 shipped gnome-shell 3.0, the same we have right now in
> Debian. But again, this 3.0 release provides little to nothing
> customization options unless you manually go and edit the required
> files. Upcoming versions of the she
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:14:23 +, Richard wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:41:32 + (UTC) Camaleón
> wrote:
>> Look at your "/etc/gdm3/daemon.conf" and check if these values are set:
>>
>> [daemon]
>> AutomaticLoginEnable = true
>> AutomaticLogin = your_username
>
> It looks like the user
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:41:32 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote:
>
> > If gnome3 was more user configurable it would be OK, I'm still using it
> > on my laptop with FC15. My problems are:
> > no automatic login~ yes I've set the user options and they
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Camaleón, hi everybody else :)
>
> at the moment the fallback mode looks promising.
Don't put your expectations on it :-)
> This weekend might become a weekend of snapshot-backups and restores. I
> still haven't installed gnome-core
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Camaleón [mailto:noela...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 12:51
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:38 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
(...)
> OT: Are there any users who l
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:47 +, Richard wrote:
> If gnome3 was more user configurable it would be OK, I'm still using it
> on my laptop with FC15. My problems are:
> no automatic login~ yes I've set the user options and they get ignored
This already has to be working. It does for me.
Look at
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:38 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Cam Hutchison [mailto:c...@xdna.net]
> Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 06:15
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?
>
> I'
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:59:38 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
(...)
> OT: Are there any users who like GNOME 3 or Unity? I already don't like
> KDE 4. I was a KDE 3 user, resp. since years i'm a GNOME 2 user, anyway,
> "until now" KDE 4 might be not that worth as GNOME 3
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Cam Hutchison [mailto:c...@xdna.net]
Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 06:15
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Is GNOME 2 panel still in unstable?
I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock,
the menu and a couple of applets
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard [mailto:richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Gesendet: Sa 11/12/2011 01:33
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: GNOME 3 - Help needed - Testing upgraded from GNOME 2 to GNOME 3
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:51:16 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf&qu
Ralf Mardorf, 11.11.2011:
>
> GNOME 3 what an odd DE.
>
> Is there a way to get back a panel that enables to switch between workspaces
> and to switch between apps?
>
> Is there a way to get back classic menus to launch apps? Even Ctrl+F2 lost
> comfort.
Try using gnome-session-fallback. It's
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:15:42 +, Cam Hutchison wrote:
> I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock,
> the menu and a couple of applets.
>
> Is this still in unstable at all? The replacement seems to be less
> functional (at the moment).
Yes, you
I'd like to keep using the panel from GNOME 2. I like its world clock,
the menu and a couple of applets.
Is this still in unstable at all? The replacement seems to be less
functional (at the moment).
Otherwise is there a compatible panel available that can use the GNOME 2
world clock?
-
ulseaudio, it completely breaks
> the workflow of sane
> users.
>
> Is there a way to get back a panel that enables to switch between workspaces
> and to switch between
> apps?
>
> Is there a way to get back classic menus to launch apps? Even Ctrl+F2 lost
> comfort.
>
enables to switch between workspaces
and to switch between apps?
Is there a way to get back classic menus to launch apps? Even Ctrl+F2 lost
comfort.
Before I run the upgrade I saved a backup of my GNOME 2 Debian. Is there the
need to restore Debian from the backup, or is there a way to get back a
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:48:43PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Nov 03 2005, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:15:30AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > > apt-get install --reinstall x11-common
> >
> > I've done it several times, w/o any results, Same situation.
The probl
On Nov 03 2005, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:15:30AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > apt-get install --reinstall x11-common
>
> I've done it several times, w/o any results, Same situation.
Filing a bug would be appropriate, then. The command:
dpkg -L x11-common
should
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:15:30AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ls: /etc/X11/rgb.txt: No such file or directory
>
> This is bad (as you've noticed).
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:863]$ dpkg --search /etc/X11/rgb.txt
> x11-common: /etc/X11/rgb.tx
Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ls: /etc/X11/rgb.txt: No such file or directory
This is bad (as you've noticed).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:863]$ dpkg --search /etc/X11/rgb.txt
x11-common: /etc/X11/rgb.txt
Rather than simply finding this file, it might be preferable to
reinstall
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:42:45AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Nov 02 2005, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > Can someone with working emacs check and see if they have this file in
> > their systems (sid)? Any other ideas?
>
> In my testing (etch) system, I have:
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Nov 02 2005, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Can someone with working emacs check and see if they have this file in
> their systems (sid)? Any other ideas?
In my testing (etch) system, I have:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep rgb /etc
Yeap, I'm screwed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ qiv -m -f fotos/cayos/*jpg
qiv: can't parse color 'black'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:35:36PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > > I recently moved from sarge to sid, and emacs is giving me some trouble.
> > > I had two lines in .emacs
> > >
> > > ;;(set-backgr
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > I recently moved from sarge to sid, and emacs is giving me some trouble.
> > I had two lines in .emacs
> >
> > ;;(set-background-color "black")
> > ;;(set-foreground-color "white")
> >
> > which I comme
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
