Re: gmc package status

2000-12-06 Thread Jeff Hornsberger
No idea what that means! I have two solutions: Progeny (progeny.com) has .debs of gmc and mc-common that are compiled with the right version of glibc so you can install those and they fix the worst problems. secondly, I just installed nautilus since it was avaiable in the update today and it's real

Re: gmc package status

2000-12-06 Thread Kai Weber
+ Joachim Trinkwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I wrote a bug fix against gmc for many weeks ago (and I was not the > only one), but the maintainers never fixed this one, even after many > upgrades both of mc and glibc, so I think they are not interested in > this specifical user problem. I just found

Re: gmc package status

2000-12-06 Thread Jeff Hornsberger
Hey, those packages from Progeny worked very well. They fixed the problem about gmc being completely unusable for newly created users. They didn't fix the problem with the URLs and not being able to change the icons on the desktop. These are minor issues by comparison, but is there a configuration

Re: gmc package status

2000-12-06 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Jeff Hornsberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. It has slowly dawned on me that, since I installed Debian almost 2 months > ago, gnome midnight > commander has never worked properly. Yes, same here. This is due to mc not being compiled with the new glibc version. > the reading I have done it

gmc package status

2000-12-05 Thread Jeff Hornsberger
Hi. It has slowly dawned on me that, since I installed Debian almost 2 months ago, gnome midnight commander has never worked properly. When I installed I copied my home dir over from my previous red hat system. In my profile I experience only a couple of the symptoms of the problems with gmc: