Hi
Following my offer, quite a few of your requested gmail invites to be
sent. I _think_ I got around to you all, but if you asked for an invite
and didn't receive one, please remind me off list.
Thanks
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodymx.net/ | Anti-spam & a
Carl Fûrstenberg wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:40:52 +0100, robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cr wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500 Rodney Richison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com) They are
Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Who are you trying to fool? Your site is a pathetic bare bones sample,
probably not even paid for yet as evidenced by the little, "default
theme sample" tag in the lower left corner of /every page/. There is
/no/ content yet you expect people on this list to listen to you a
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:40:52 +0100, robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cr wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500 Rodney Richison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
> I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com) They are a VERY
> q
cr wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500
Rodney Richison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
On Wednesday October 6 at 02:30pm
Mark Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it just me, or did you just install a fresh copy of Apache?
> Totally no site anymore?
Thats what it looks like, but the server-signature is
Apache/1.3.31 Server at www.channelvar.com Port 80
and the folder is apache2-de
Rodney Richison wrote:
I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
though) :)
The preferred method is top posting.
The preferred format is to allow html.
Is it just me, or did you just install a fresh copy of Apache
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:57, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500
> Rodney Richison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
> > They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
> > though) :)
> > The pre
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500
Rodney Richison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
> They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
> though) :)
> The preferred method is top posting.
> The preferred format is to allow
Bob Underwood wrote:
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:32 pm, calvin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:24:10AM -0500, Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
because they can't fo
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:32 pm, calvin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:24:10AM -0500, Rodney Richison wrote:
> >>Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
> >>and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
> >>because they can't follow the thread
On (05/10/04 12:52), Nate Duehr wrote:
> Rodney Richison wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >>Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
> >>and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
> >>because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
> >>forum
Rodney Richison wrote:
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom posting and everybody seems to find that
normal.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:24:10AM -0500, Rodney Richison wrote:
>
>
>>Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
>>and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
>>because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
>>forum works with bo
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:22PM +0100, Daniel Goldsmith wrote:
> pace the whole GMail issue - I use it for mailing lists, for pretty
> much the same reasons to do with wastage. I simply cannot afford the
> bandwidth to download much of the crud which populates mailing-lists -
> Google Inc. can.
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:24:10 -0500, Rodney Richison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> I run a list for techs/consultants. (ChannelVar.com)
> They are a VERY qualified bunch of guys. (Admittedly not linux users
> though) :)
> The preferred method is top posting.
> The preferred format is to allow h
Incoming from Rodney Richison:
>
> >Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
> >and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
> >because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
> >forum works with bottom posting and everybody seem
Top posting leads to a big mess. Every non-technical person does it
and it ends up with them saying "let's use a forum or something"
because they can't follow the thread any longer. Surprise surprise, a
forum works with bottom posting and everybody seems to find that
normal.
I run a list for te
t;Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
> >gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy.
> >
> >
>
> Whether gmail sends them itself, it's still advertising and it's still
> spam, and it's annoying more than jus
Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
> (I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
> experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
> in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Top posting may work. But I t
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
Have those posting their invites acutally READ
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy.
Whether gmail sends them itself,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:19:43 +0200
Wim De Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:57:41 +1000, Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman said
> > > (I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
> > > ex
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:57:41 +1000, Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman said
> > (I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
> > experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
> > in reverse chro
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman said
> (I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
> experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
> in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Every single technical list (far too many) I'm on is *
"Andrew A. Raines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Nothing but quoted text.]
Sigh. I've put this off long enough.
(defun aar-dont-send-yet-stupid ()
"Dang, C-c C-c is easy to hit."
(interactive)
(message "Type M-x message-send-and-exit..."))
(define-key message-mode-map "\C-c\
the faq's re
>> > privacy and security?
>>
>> Have those posting their invites acutally READ
>> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
>
> Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
> gmail invites do not remotely fall
On 13-09-2004, at 23h 14'49", Patrick Wiseman wrote about "Re: [Way OT] Re: GMAIL
Invites..!"
> Even relatively undisciplined correspondents don't make that kind of
> mess. And my _top_ posting might just clarify for anyone who's
> joining this way-OT-aside
I wouldn't mind top posters so much if they would trim the quoted
portion of the reply. Top posting makes it easier to forget and include
the entire message, which in most cases is unnecessary.
--
-johann koenig
Now Playing: At the Driv-in - Catacomb : Plea For Peace - Take Action
(Vol. 1)
Today
On Monday September 13 at 10:37pm
Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mail-Followup-To: is better than Reply-To: for mailing lists, see
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
> Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
> gmail invites do not remotely
Even relatively undisciplined correspondents don't make that kind of
mess. And my _top_ posting might just clarify for anyone who's
joining this way-OT-aside what we're discussing. _Insisting_ on
bottom posting is, in my view, silly. We should trust each other to
be clear. But it's this list's
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Not in my experience. As a third-party reader, where do you star
Kent West wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Not in my experience. As a third-party reader, where do you start in
the followi
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email
in reverse chronological order. It works.)
Not in my experience. As a third-party reader, where do you start in the
following dialog, and wh
ing their invites acutally READ
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering
gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy.
(I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my
experience -
* matt okeson-harlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040912 21:42]:
> for those bashing on google... have you actually READ the faq's re
> privacy and security?
Have those posting their invites acutally READ
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html#ads ?
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
On Sunday September 12 at 02:42pm
matt okeson-harlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for those bashing on google... have you actually READ the faq's re
> privacy and security?
I have. I don't care. I just don't like Gmail invites showing up
everywhere. Maybe you m
for those bashing on google... have you actually READ the faq's re
privacy and security?
guess not
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:05:03 +0300, Hasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'r right , google is very very clever . He knows the rules of the game.
>
>
> Johann Koenig wrote:
>
> >On Saturday Sept
You'r right , google is very very clever . He knows the rules of the game.
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GMail
Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11 Sep 2004 09:17:51 -0700
Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
> > kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > GMail
> >
> > Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
>
> I su
Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
> kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > GMail
>
> Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
I suggest that we start a new debian list called
debian-spam-gmail_invites.
I am amazed that s
On Saturday September 11 at 09:43am
kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GMail
Google is very clever, they get other people to send out their SPAM
--
-johann koenig
Today is Pungenday, the 34th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3170
My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/
pgpEBsBg2cht9.
Hello All,
I have more then a few GMail invites.
but rule of the game is FCFS.
--
Nayyar Ahmad
Lecturer
Faculty Of Computer Science,
Institute Of Management Sciences,
Hayat Abad Peshawar , Pakistan.
Office : 92-091-9217404 , 9217452
Cell : 92-0333-9139461
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hello All,
I have GMail invites. those who left that day are highly appriciated.
But the game rule is same FIRST COME FIRST SERVER -;)
--
Nayyar Ahmad
Lecturer
Faculty Of Computer Science,
Institute Of Management Sciences,
Hayat Abad Peshawar , Pakistan.
Office : 92-091-9217404 , 9217452
Cell
I've got 6 of 'em
Please reply off list if you want one (first come first served)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All,
If any body need gmail account send me a mail .
on the bases of FIrst Come First Serve... ;)
--
Nayyar Ahmad
Lecturer
Faculty Of Computer Science,
Institute Of Management Sciences,
Hayat Abad Peshawar , Pakistan.
Office : 92-091-9217404 , 9217452
Cell : 92-0333-9139461
--
To
Jeff Elkins wrote:
Thanks to this list for all the help over the years. Here are ten gmail
invites.
Thank you!
I wanted to thank you via gmail, but I get
"Server Error
The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your
request.
Please try again in 30 seconds."
Goo
Thanks to this list for all the help over the years. Here are ten gmail
invites.
Jeff Elkins
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-393ce3cb67-c434e4a09c-379c78ef27
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-393ce3cb67-9ede1d9490-12a92af7ec
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-393ce3cb67-534ab78e38-0c6cd8bf4a
25 Jun 2004, 22:47, David P James:
Has anyone who uses GMail been able to use it with Konqueror? It works
with Firefox but with Konqueror, after logging in, I'm sent to a page
that says "Loading..." in a red field at the top right (which I also
see in Firefox) but I never get any further than that
We're sorry, but we don't seem to be compatible.
Our software suggests that you're using a browser incompatible with
Gmail. Gmail currently supports the following:
Microsoft IE 5.5 and newer (download: Windows)
Netscape 7.1 and newer (download: Windows Macintosh Linux )
Mozilla 1.4 and new
On Fri 25 June 2004 00:43, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> Well, since you broke the ice. I've been less than impressed with
> it. Friend of mine sent me an invite 2 days ago. I subscribed 2
> whole lists. Moderate volume compared to what I process with
> Thunderbird (& sylpheed-claws, mutt, TheBat!, PMM
Ricky Clarkson wrote:
> Thread is a pretty unintuitive term, conversation is more natural - I
> won't have to explain to my parents what conversation means, with any
> luck :)
Conversation is unintuative because we're not having one. Conversations
are generally verbal affairs. ;) I might ha
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:14:44 -0700, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no ability to sort on anything other than having each thread
> (damn their "conversations" notion, we need no new terms here!) show up based
Thread is a pretty unintuitive term, conversation is more natural -
Daved Daly wrote:
>> Nope because the problem stems from the very core of how they are
>>doing things.
> I'm still not sure, I really understand exactly what you mean there...
The whole archives instead of delete and lack of folders in combination.
> Again, I dont exactly get what you mean
Made a mistake. My address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone who has responded in this thread I have marked for the list.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:19:27 -0400, S.D.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:03:29AM -0500 or thereabouts, James W. Thompson, II wrote:
> > I do not have an
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:03:29AM -0500 or thereabouts, James W. Thompson, II wrote:
> I do not have anymore invitations right now. If there are others
> interested in them please drop me a simple message at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll send some out as soon as I get them.
Thanks James! Sent an o
I do not have anymore invitations right now. If there are others
interested in them please drop me a simple message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll send some out as soon as I get them.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:44:51 -0400, S.D.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:21:48PM -0500
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:21:48PM -0500 or thereabouts, James W. Thompson, II wrote:
> I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
> simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
> long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 01:26:15PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> James W. Thompson, II wrote:
>
> >I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
>
> Spammer
Your reply contributes about as much on-topic discussion as his original
post did.
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowlan
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:26:15 +0800, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James W. Thompson, II wrote:
>
> >I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
> >
> >
>
> Spammer
Not really. To thoese 6 new gmail users, it's not. He may want to
label this kind of email
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:36:59 -0700, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:38:26 -0700, Daved Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps you've misunderstood the concept of "Beta". :)
>
>Uh, no. Been on quite a few betas in my time.
I was jokingly saying that, not a
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:38:26 -0700, Daved Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you've misunderstood the concept of "Beta". :)
Uh, no. Been on quite a few betas in my time.
> If you think it lacks features or doesnt work how it would best suit
> you have you botherd to send a "feature re
James W. Thompson, II wrote:
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
Spammer
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James W. Thompson, II wrote:
> I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
> simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
> long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
> wants them here.
D'oh, and forgot to mention in my l
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:21:48 -0500, James W. Thompson, II
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
> simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
> long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
> w
I have six GMail invitations to give away. If you are interested
simply visit one of the following pages, first come, first served. As
long as no one protests I will post other invitations to give whoever
wants them here.
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-5cb03dc1c9-50683ed958
http://gmail.google.c
65 matches
Mail list logo
