> > $ lspci | grep VGA
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV28 [GeForce4 Ti
> > 4200 Go AGP 8x] (rev a1)
>
> Please file a bug against the xserver-xorg-video-nouveau package.
>
done
> > The currently-installed Ubuntu 8.04 works fine. Lenny o
On 2010-09-03 21:45 +0200, Rob Owens wrote:
> Running Squeeze on my wife's laptop gives horrible graphics performance
> (vertical lines all over the place, and a very fuzzy mouse pointer).
>
> $ lspci | grep VGA
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV28 [G
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> Running Squeeze on my wife's laptop gives horrible graphics performance
> (vertical lines all over the place, and a very fuzzy mouse pointer).
>
> $ lspci | grep VGA
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporati
Running Squeeze on my wife's laptop gives horrible graphics performance
(vertical lines all over the place, and a very fuzzy mouse pointer).
$ lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV28 [GeForce4 Ti
4200 Go AGP 8x] (rev a1)
The currently-installed Ubuntu
george roman wrote:
Joris Huizer wrote:
Richard Cavell wrote:
Hi,
I wish to extract my kernel source into /usr/src. I downloaded it as
a bz2 file. Only root can write into this file. My 'GNOME Desktop
Manager' does not allow me to log in as root.
Now in KDE my Ark program will allow me to ext
Joris Huizer wrote:
Richard Cavell wrote:
Hi,
I wish to extract my kernel source into /usr/src. I downloaded it as
a bz2 file. Only root can write into this file. My 'GNOME Desktop
Manager' does not allow me to log in as root.
Now in KDE my Ark program will allow me to extract, but I can't wr
matt zagrabelny wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 02:30, Richard Cavell wrote:
Hi,
I wish to extract my kernel source into /usr/src. I downloaded it as a
bz2 file. Only root can write into this file. My 'GNOME Desktop
Manager' does not allow me to log in as root.
that is set by default, yo
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 02:30, Richard Cavell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to extract my kernel source into /usr/src. I downloaded it as a
> bz2 file. Only root can write into this file. My 'GNOME Desktop
> Manager' does not allow me to log in as root.
>
that is set by default, you can change it at
Richard Cavell wrote:
Hi,
I wish to extract my kernel source into /usr/src. I downloaded it as a
bz2 file. Only root can write into this file. My 'GNOME Desktop
Manager' does not allow me to log in as root.
Now in KDE my Ark program will allow me to extract, but I can't write
into /usr/src.
Hi,
I wish to extract my kernel source into /usr/src. I downloaded it as a
bz2 file. Only root can write into this file. My 'GNOME Desktop
Manager' does not allow me to log in as root.
Now in KDE my Ark program will allow me to extract, but I can't write
into /usr/src. I can cheat by, say,
I recently did several new installs that use this video card. I have found
the easiest method (using the new Debian Installer and kernel 2.6.7) is do
the install, and then when X does not come up, reboot using the Knoppix
CDROM, let Knoppix do it's thing and find the settings, then copy the Kno
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 01:21:16AM +0100, Paul Nolan wrote:
> Tomy Alarie wrote:
> >Hi, im trying to install my new video card with a fresh installation of
> >debian. Can anyone give me the steps to do it ?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Tomy
>
> I have the same card ^_^
> All I did was download the binary dr
Tomy Alarie wrote:
Hi, im trying to install my new video card with a fresh installation of
debian. Can anyone give me the steps to do it ?
Thanks,
Tomy
I have the same card ^_^
All I did was download the binary driver from www.nvidia.com, then boot
up into run level 3 (no X11) and run the instal
Hi, im trying to install my new video card with a fresh installation of
debian. Can anyone give me the steps to do it ?
Thanks,
Tomy
-
e6e9fe46b17fa16d9a250d4189e8f0cd
fingerprint
Quadra 650 | Debian 3.0r2 | m68k
_
Profitez d
Thanks to everybody.
(BI was trying to get answer from japanese mailing list.
(BThe result is that I can use vesa driver (1280x1024, 16 bit) for GeForce4 MX
(B440.
(BFor me it is enough to use X-Window (I don't need Open-GL etc.).
(B
(BIf I use backports.org I'm afraid the
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 13:43, askar wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> > > Are the nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source included as a
> > > stable package?
> >
> > They most likely are too old. Get the drivers from Nvidia, or get an
> > XFree backport.
> What does it mean to get XFree backport?
It
Hello
askar (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>>> Are the nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source included as a
>>> stable package?
>>
>> They most likely are too old. Get the drivers from Nvidia, or get an
>> XFree backport.
> What does it mean to get XFree backport?
To install XFree 4.2 or 4
Thank you.
> > Are the nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source included as a
> > stable package?
>
> They most likely are too old. Get the drivers from Nvidia, or get an
> XFree backport.
What does it mean to get XFree backport?
askar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hello
askar (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I use Woody, 2.4.18-bf2.4.
> It is known that xfree4.1 which is stable in Woody doesn't support
> GeForce4 MX 440.
> In mailing list archive I found
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg01883.html,
> Trying to
Hello!
I use Woody, 2.4.18-bf2.4.
It is known that xfree4.1 which is stable in Woody doesn't support GeForce4
MX 440.
In mailing list archive I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg01883.html,
Trying to install nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source, the system
gives
Hello!
I use Woody, 2.4.18-bf2.4.
It is known that xfree4.1 which is stable in Woody doesn't support GeForce4
MX 440.
In mailing list archive I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg01883.html,
Trying to install nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source, the system
gives
First... What kind of debian you're using ? ( woody,
sid, sarge )
Second...Please supply your kernel version. By typing
uname -a on console...
For an example, this is what I did last time with my
debian sid box on 2.4.25-686 kernel :
- installing nvidia-kernel-2.4.25-1-686 by executing
apt-get i
First... What kind of debian you're using ? ( woody,
sid, sarge )
Second...Please supply your kernel version. By typing
uname -a on console...
For an example, this is what I did last time with my
debian sid box on 2.4.25-686 kernel :
- installing nvidia-kernel-2.4.25-1-686 by executing
- [EMAIL P
I find stories on how to install my graphics card. But they are to difficult for me. I
downloaded the file NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run from the Nvidia web-site. But
when I'm running it, it starts to ask all sorts of difficult questions.
There seems to be a file (or more files) that I hav
Hello,
Nvidia doesn't make monitors. The monitor is the thing that contains
the CRT and looks a bit like a TV. Nvidia chips should work even with
the default open source driver, but you should go to Nvidia's site and
download the latest driver provided by Nvidia. Install that. As far as
your
Hi All,
I am using the above monitor and created the XF86 config file using
the xf86config tool. But it is still not able to start the X windows. The
o/p dispplays the different chipsets available in Nvidia. I am using
2.2.20-idepci stable kernel. Just wanted to know what I am doing wrong
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 08:05
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
Thanks for the assistance. I downloaded and installed the kernel-headers
then downlo
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown said
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey said
Be careful trimming attributions, you don't want to be held responsible
for something I said ;-)
> > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 05:37
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > I placed the order for the 7 CD woody 3.0r1 -i386 on Sept 20,
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:11
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
>
> > Would that be XFree86-4.0.2 or 4.0.3 or 4.2 or 4.3. If the latter I
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 05:39
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > Thanks you Haines. I have downloaded all the required stuff and
> > on
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 04:41
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt B
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> > > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> > >and "nvidia-kernel-src" packages make this rather easy. This is only
> > >an opti
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> > > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> > >and "nvidia-kernel-src" packages make this rather easy. This is only
> > >an opti
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Crump" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 23:30
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
This is a subject I have a qestion about. When I
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 23:01
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
Would that be XFree86-4.0.2 or 4.0.3 or 4.2 or 4.3. If the latter I
> Thanks you Haines. I have downloaded all the required stuff and
> only need to know where to put it to install. I hope no one says it
> dosent matter. That isnt the question. Where do I put the header
> files? Where to put the driver files?
> Sincere Thanks for your help;
> Hoyt
It _really_
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:41:33AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
> > 3) get the non-free binary-only nvidia drivers. The "nvidia-glx-src"
> >and "nvidia-kernel-src" packages make this rather easy. This is only
> >an option on x86, however.
>
> Rob, I follow you on points 1
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey said
> > Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
> > driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
>
> Unfortunately, GeForce4 cards won't work wit
- Original Message -
From: "Haines Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 08:27
Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX440 with kernel 2.4.18-bf24
> > Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so
what
Hoyt Bailey wrote:
Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
Regards;
Hoyt
I use the 'nvidia' driver which you install from nvidia-kernel-source
and nvidia-glx. I have also used the 'nv' dr
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:26:40AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey said
> Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
> driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
Unfortunately, GeForce4 cards won't work with the "nv" driver inc
> Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
> driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
> Regards;
> Hoyt
Hoyt, that's my setup. I downloaded the new nVidia driver from the
nVidia website. Installation a bit rocky (I'll go into specif
Is anyone running the subject video card on the subject kernel. If so what
driver are you using? If you know where can I get a copy of your driver?
Regards;
Hoyt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Has anyone been able to use framebuffers with kernel
2.6.0 and a GeForce4 MX 440 or a RIVA TNT2 Model 64?
Thanks!
Hugo.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
From: Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Diff btw GeForce4 and RIVA TNT2?
>> Quod erat demonstrandum!
>The nvidia-using-TNT2 will *smoke* the
nv-using-GeForce4.
Unfortunately with Backstreet Ruby I cannot mix nvidia
and nv, so both the figures are with nvidia.
Unfortunatel
Martin Jungowski writes:
> I don't know about XFree 4.2 but there is a XFree 4.3 backport. You can
> find the information (amnong lots of other backports) here:
> http://www.debianforum.de/wiki/WoodyBackports
Thank you. I'll have the client install 4.2 from there as soon as he gets
back from out
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 08:59, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thanks for those answers!
>
> So... apt-getted xscreensaver-gl. gears -fps -delay 0
> indeed is the most straightforward app. to show the
> difference.
>
> Left monitor, with the GeForce4: 155 fps.
>
Hi all!
Thanks for those answers!
So... apt-getted xscreensaver-gl. gears -fps -delay 0
indeed is the most straightforward app. to show the
difference.
Left monitor, with the GeForce4: 155 fps.
Right monitor, with RIVA TNT2: 50 fps.
Quod erat demonstrandum!
Hugo
Hi,
I don't know about XFree 4.2 but there is a XFree 4.3 backport. You can
find the information (amnong lots of other backports) here:
http://www.debianforum.de/wiki/WoodyBackports
I would recommend to install the nvidia drivers too, they're faster than
the XFree4 nv drivers.
MJ
On Thu, 20
John Spray writes:
> My experience of XFree 4.1 is that its version of the nv driver doesn't
> support the geforce 4.
The client claims (I don't have access to the machine) to have done a stock
Woody install, had X working fine, done 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade',
and had X then fail.
> You'l
John Hasler wrote:
I have a client with Dell with a nVidia GeForce4. He had Woody installed
and working. He did an apt-get upgrade and now X fails with
Fatal server error:
XFree86 has found a valid card configuration.
Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h
I have a client with Dell with a nVidia GeForce4. He had Woody installed
and working. He did an apt-get upgrade and now X fails with
Fatal server error:
XFree86 has found a valid card configuration.
Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h.
Is this a known
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 12:42, David Z Maze wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> > different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> > the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
> >
>
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
>
> I notice no difference between the 2 other than that I
> paid $25 more for
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:00, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have Backstreet Ruby installed so I have 2 monitors
> with kbds/mice that each have a user.
>
> The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
Hi all!
I have Backstreet Ruby installed so I have 2 monitors
with kbds/mice that each have a user.
The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
I notice no difference between the 2 other than that I
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 05:28:30PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:20:07 +0200, john gennard wrote:
>
[snip]
> > _KDE_IceTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.ICE-unix should be set to root
> > DCOPServer up and running.
> > kdeinit: Fatal IO error: client killed
> > kdeinit: sendin
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:07:55AM +0100, john gennard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:44:25AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > When X loops back the login manager, there is normally an error listed
> > in the ~/.xsession-errors for the user that can't log in. Does this
> > file contain any
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:20:07 +0200, john gennard wrote:
> From Sebastian Kapfe's latest posting it seems that I have
> compiled DEVPTS_FS into my kernels and this is not the
> same as DEVFS. Could this be the answer? I can easily
> recompile.
No, probably not. KDE should run fine without devfs.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:07:30PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:40:13 +0200, john gennard wrote:
>
> >> The "EE" lines are pointing to references to a mouse set up on a DEVFS
> >> system. You may not be running that... Are your disk drives referred to
> >> /dev/hdaX, w
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:44:25AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:30:22PM +0100, john gennard wrote:
>
> > Booting gets to a screen (after a pause and some horizontal lines.
> > The screen eventually appears normal and the kdm login appears,
> > looking normal. The mou
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:40:13 +0200, john gennard wrote:
>> The "EE" lines are pointing to references to a mouse set up on a DEVFS
>> system. You may not be running that... Are your disk drives referred to
>> /dev/hdaX, where X is a number, or a longer, more informative designation ??
>>
> I hav
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:30:22PM +0100, john gennard wrote:
> Booting gets to a screen (after a pause and some horizontal lines.
> The screen eventually appears normal and the kdm login appears,
> looking normal. The mouse works, so I can opt for user or root, and
> the keyboard allows me to ent
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:34:09PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:50:07 +0200, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> >> The "EE" lines are pointing to references to a mouse set up on a DEVFS
> >> system.
>
> AFAIK the input layer has nothing to do with devfs. PS/2 mice should use
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:41:38PM +0100, John Stevenson wrote:
> Try one of the following:
>
> a) Change the Generic Mouse protocol to ImPS/2
It is already that.
> b) Change the Configured Mouse to point to /dev/psaux
It is already that.
> c) If you have a Logitec Mouse, try use the MouseManP
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:41:31PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > At 08:11 PM 7/17/2003 +0100, john gennard wrote:
> > >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
> >
> > >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
> > >(EE) xf86OpenSerial:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> At 08:11 PM 7/17/2003 +0100, john gennard wrote:
> >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
>
> >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
> >(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice No such
> >device.
> >(EE) Generic M
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:50:07 +0200, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>> The "EE" lines are pointing to references to a mouse set up on a DEVFS
>> system.
AFAIK the input layer has nothing to do with devfs. PS/2 mice should use
/dev/psaux, wether devfs or not. USB mice use /dev/input/*, wether devfs
or not
Try one of the following:
a) Change the Generic Mouse protocol to ImPS/2
b) Change the Configured Mouse to point to /dev/psaux
c) If you have a Logitec Mouse, try use the MouseManPlusPS/2 protocol.
Johnny.
Subject:
GeForce4 card
From:
john gennard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jul 2003
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:21:27PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Are you using DEVFS ?? I don't and seem to recall either removing the
> entries for /dev/input/mice or commenting them out. I probably
> wouldn't have done that unless there was a problem that brought this
> "section" to my attentio
At 01:41 PM 7/17/2003 -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> At 08:11 PM 7/17/2003 +0100, john gennard wrote:
> >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
>
> >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
> >(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/in
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> At 08:11 PM 7/17/2003 +0100, john gennard wrote:
> >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
>
> >(**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
> >(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice No such
> >device.
> >(EE) Generic M
At 08:11 PM 7/17/2003 +0100, john gennard wrote:
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice No such device.
(EE) Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
(EE) PreInit failed for input device "Generic Mouse"
I purchased a GeForce4 MX440 AGP8x 128Mb DDR VIVO DVI VGA card.
There have been some postings regarding installation of the
nvidia driver for this board. I followed these, and thought
Rob Weir's help back in April would give me all the guidance
needed.
I run Woody, and felt it best to ge
When I first built the drivers, I had an older 64mb nvidia agp in there
and didn't have that problem. However, since the older one is starting to
tweak out, I had to replace it with this newer one that's a 64mb Geforce 4
MX440SE-T. I redid the process starting at the /usr/src/linux. Would
wiping
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:12:24PM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 14:35, Jeremy Cheng wrote:
> > I have successfully built the nvidia drivers and Gnome is looking great.
> > However, when I logout of X and return to console, my monitor displays a
> > box that says "Moni
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 14:35, Jeremy Cheng wrote:
> I have successfully built the nvidia drivers and Gnome is looking great.
> However, when I logout of X and return to console, my monitor displays a
> box that says "Monitor is working, out of scan range, change PC settings"
> It also happens
I have successfully built the nvidia drivers and Gnome is looking great.
However, when I logout of X and return to console, my monitor displays a
box that says "Monitor is working, out of scan range, change PC settings"
It also happens when I do ctrl-alt-F* into any other terminals from X.
Does
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:29:46PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:49:55PM +, Pigeon wrote:
No I didn't, you did :-)
> > > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make"
> > > > the drivers.
> > > > All I had to do was "make" to get them to load (I c
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:49:55PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make"
> > > the drivers.
> > > All I had to do was "make" to get them to load (I couldn't just load
> > > them). They still don't want to load even though they're in
> > > /etc/modul
ma Jane Hogbin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:35 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX
> > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make"
> > the drivers.
> > Al
: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> > Yes. There are a lot of things that don't make sense about
> debian on my
> > laptop. Including why usb, parallel printing and cdburning
> won'
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> Yes. There are a lot of things that don't make sense about debian on my
> laptop. Including why usb, parallel printing and cdburning won't work.
D'uh. I'd recompiled the kernel but not pointed lilo to the right bzImage.
Tonight I
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:13:10AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:09:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> > > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
&g
Thus spake Emma Jane Hogbin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
> > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv
> >
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:09:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
> > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that th
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
> system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv
> driver i'm using only wants to work on nvidia cards up to th
Hey everyone,
I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv
driver i'm using only wants to work on nvidia cards up to the GeForce3, at
least taht's what the string listing the suppo
[Please, please, please actually delineate your message from the quote!
That standard syntax is prefixing each line with a '> ', as you see
below. At least you wrapped your lines this time...]
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:09:40PM +0100, Aedificator wrote:
> TNX for the info but when I try to instal
* sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [28-11-2002 18:11]:
> i and a few others have answered this question 3 or 4 times in the
> past week or so... for future reference it really helps to search
> through the mail archive for your question before asking it, but since
> i still have the answer grepped f
roll your own kernel with make-kpkg, or at least install the
kernel-headers package for your kernel version
# cd /usr/src/linux && make-kpkg binary
(then look for debs in /usr/src, or)
# apt-get install kernel-headers-2.x.x
- install the following packages:
# apt-get install nvidia-glx-src nvidi
roll your own kernel with make-kpkg, or at
least install the kernel-headers package for your kernel version#
cd /usr/src/linux && make-kpkg binary(then look for debs in
/usr/src, or)# apt-get install kernel-headers-2.x.x
- install the following packages:# apt-get
install nvidia-glx-src
roll your own kernel with make-kpkg, or at
least install the kernel-headers package for your kernel version#
cd /usr/src/linux && make-kpkg binary(then look for debs in
/usr/src, or)# apt-get install kernel-headers-2.x.x
- install the following packages:# apt-get
install nvidia-glx-src
i and a few others have answered this question 3 or 4 times in the
past week or so... for future reference it really helps to search
through the mail archive for your question before asking it, but since
i still have the answer grepped from my outbox, here's the "debian way":
- roll your own kerne
I guess that you can try `nv'.
May be a better idea is to visit the NVidia site
http://www.nvidia.com/content/drivers/drivers.asp
I hope that helps.
Peterka wrote:
Hi!
I have a Geforce 4 Ti 4200 64 Mb vga card, and i can't run
any gui. When installing, what should i choose?
vesa,vga,nv?
Is th
Hi!
I have a Geforce 4 Ti 4200 64 Mb vga card, and i can't run
any gui. When installing, what should i choose?
vesa,vga,nv?
Is this card supported, or I have to wait until it will be?
Please help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Andrew R Reid wrote:
> With all due respect Mike, you should look at using the nvidia accelerated
> driver. I've installed it on three machines this week, and it is not only
> fairly simple with Debians excellent package management system, it also
> makes an incredible differ
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Dresser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 12:42 AM
> To: Edward Guldemond
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote:
>
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote:
> nv is the unaccelerated driver...nvidia is the accelerated driver. In
> order to get accelerated GL, you need the nvidia driver.
>
> Read the /usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx/README.gz if you have compiled and
> installed and the accelerated driver kit.
Ok
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
