Re: gcc error - solved

2004-08-11 Thread Martin Wegmann
Hi, On Wednesday 11 August 2004 17:49, Florian Ernst wrote: [] > > Hm, sounds like and > should tell more, despite the > different version. So if your system is more "unstable" than > "testing" try updating binutils. thanks, tha

Re: gcc error

2004-08-11 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello! On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:09:03PM +0200, Martin Wegmann wrote: > configure:698: checking host system type > configure:721: checking for gcc > configure:825: checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works > configure:841: gcc -o conftest    conftest.c  1>&5 > /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option

gcc error

2004-08-11 Thread Martin Wegmann
Hello, I encountered a gcc problem after upgrading various other packages. Previously ./configure worked fine but now I get this message: ./configure --with-grass50=/home/misc/software/grass/grass53_exp_2004_08_07 checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for gcc... gcc checking

Re: gcc error

2000-12-03 Thread Nate Amsden
Willi Dyck wrote: > > Hi list, > > i'm trieing to install gnapster 1.4.1a > doing ./configure i get the following: > > loading cache ./config.cache > checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking whether make sets ${MA

Re: gcc error

2000-12-03 Thread scr
Willi Dyck schrieb: > > checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler > cannot create executables. Output of `gcc -v´ is? scr

gcc error

2000-12-03 Thread Willi Dyck
Hi list, i'm trieing to install gnapster 1.4.1a doing ./configure i get the following: loading cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for working aclocal

Re: internal gcc error

1998-06-19 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Jens Lisner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi! | | I've tried to compile the kernel-source (-2.0.33 && -2.0.34) with | make-kpkg. I've got some messages i cant explain to me. [hopefully someone else can help you with the make-kpkg stuff] | And final | make-kpkg -revision=custom.1.0 kernel-image re

internal gcc error

1998-06-19 Thread Jens Lisner
Hi! I've tried to compile the kernel-source (-2.0.33 && -2.0.34) with make-kpkg. I've got some messages i cant explain to me. First make xconfig returned: WARNING - broken Config.in! CONFIG_ALPHA_BOOK1 was not declared! What is it and where can i select it?? make-kpkg clean returned ... te

Re: Final Update to GCC Error

1996-10-28 Thread Christian Watts
Bruce Perens wrote: > > From: Christian Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This is in regards to the discussion concerning 'fatal signal 11' > > under GCC 2.7.2 on my machine. > > Resetting the CPU type from 120Mhz to 100Mhz resolved the problem. I'm > > not exactly sure why, but it worked. > > Inter

Re: Final Update to GCC Error

1996-10-26 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Christian Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This is in regards to the discussion concerning 'fatal signal 11' > under GCC 2.7.2 on my machine. > Resetting the CPU type from 120Mhz to 100Mhz resolved the problem. I'm > not exactly sure why, but it worked. Interesting. Did you use the same memory o

Final Update to GCC Error

1996-10-25 Thread Christian Watts
Hey all, This is in regards to the discussion concerning 'fatal signal 11' under GCC 2.7.2 on my machine. Resetting the CPU type from 120Mhz to 100Mhz resolved the problem. I'm not exactly sure why, but it worked. Thanks to all who responded for their suggestions. I