On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Robert Kerr wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
> Thanks for your response. Do you happen to know if objects compiled with
> 3.0 can successfully link against libraries created with 2.95.x?
No, they can not.
...RickM...
TED]>
To: Debian List
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0, namespace, and such
I'm far from being an expert, but :
1- yes you can safely install gcc v3 (and g++ v3 and so on) alongside
the 2.9X
you call it only by appending -3.0 to its name.
2- I have some syntactic problems with g++ v3 as far as de
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:17:14PM -0600, Robert Kerr wrote:
| Hi all,
| Here's my situation. I'm developing a rather large project, and we're
| starting to use stl stuff. Unfortunately, one of our vendor libraries
| uses a "vector", which then clashes with the stl vectors we're starting to
| use
I'm far from being an expert, but :
1- yes you can safely install gcc v3 (and g++ v3 and so on) alongside the 2.9X
you call it only by appending -3.0 to its name.
2- I have some syntactic problems with g++ v3 as far as dereferencing
functionsis concerned. Hell, i'm really not an expert, but someth
Hi all,
Here's my situation. I'm developing a rather large project, and we're
starting to use stl stuff. Unfortunately, one of our vendor libraries
uses a "vector", which then clashes with the stl vectors we're starting to
use. Because of gcc 2.95.2 not supporting namespace correctly
(ie. puttin
5 matches
Mail list logo
