[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've not yet seen a date for the code freeze, so there is a good change gcc
> 2.8.0 will make it in.
How compatible is 2.8.0 with 2.7.2.3? If there are problems and 2.8.0
is introduced too late, we could end up with hamm not being able to
compile itself.
--
On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 05:34:23PM +0100, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote:
> For some inexplicable reason the FSF decided to release gcc 2.8.0 and
> libg++2.8.0, which I had been expecting for ages. Anyone know if it will
> be included in hamm before it freezes?
Rumor has it our gcc/egcc maintainer is c
A miracle has happened.
For some inexplicable reason the FSF decided to release gcc 2.8.0 and
libg++2.8.0, which I had been expecting for ages. Anyone know if it
will be included in hamm before it freezes?
Eric Meijer
--
E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | tel. office +31 40 2472189
E
3 matches
Mail list logo