Re: gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:44:40 -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > > csj wrote: > > > What's the real deal on the gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.2 transition? > > I've read enough FUD I can't distinguish the > > facts. Particularly, what programs or libraries are actually > > affected? What havoc would result from com

RE: gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition

ECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:16 PM To: Debian User Subject: gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition What's the real deal on the gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.2 transition? I've read enough FUD I can't distinguish the facts. Particularly, what programs or libraries are actually affected? What hav

Re: gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition

csj wrote: > What's the real deal on the gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.2 transition? I've > read enough FUD I can't distinguish the facts. Particularly, what > programs or libraries are actually affected? What havoc would > result from compiling the kernel or X with 3.2 on a largely > Testing system (since Te

gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition

What's the real deal on the gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.2 transition? I've read enough FUD I can't distinguish the facts. Particularly, what programs or libraries are actually affected? What havoc would result from compiling the kernel or X with 3.2 on a largely Testing system (since Testing has gcc-2.95 as