Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to configure fvwm95 window manager to my own needs. Does anyone
> know a tool with which I can configure Fvwm95-Buttons and put a background
> image? I have read some docs about it, but they were not very clear. I
> know how to adjust the
Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to configure fvwm95 window manager to my own needs. Does anyone
> know a tool with which I can configure Fvwm95-Buttons and put a background
> image? I have read some docs about it, but they were not very clear. I
> know how to
Hello,
I want to configure fvwm95 window manager to my own needs. Does anyone
know a tool with which I can configure Fvwm95-Buttons and put a background
image? I have read some docs about it, but they were not very clear. I
know how to adjust the Buttons by editing the config file, but I found
o be seen. I've removed and then reinstalled both that and
fvwm95 and everything is now fine. Thank you David, Romain, all is
now running fine.
--
Gary
Debian 2.1r4 (kernel v2.0.39); XFree86 3.3.6
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on
the shoulders of giants. (Isaac Newton)
installed X and am getting this error on typing "startx":
>
> fvwm95: error in loading shared libraries
> libXpm.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
>
> What I've done is to install X 3.3.3.2 + fvwm95 from my CD-ROM and
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Gary Jones wrote:
> I've just installed X and am getting this error on typing "startx":
>
> fvwm95: error in loading shared libraries
> libXpm.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
>
> What I'
I've just installed X and am getting this error on typing "startx":
fvwm95: error in loading shared libraries
libXpm.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
What I've done is to install X 3.3.3.2 + fvwm95 from my CD-ROM and
then installed
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:46:08 -0200, Christoph Simon writes:
>> I´ve compared the whole /etc/X11, /usr/lib/X11 and /usr/X11R6 to the
>> last backup, no differences found.
>
>Did you also check the dotfiles at home? Try entering as a differrent
>(new) user to see if the problem remains.
<[EMAIL
> I´ve compared the whole /etc/X11, /usr/lib/X11 and /usr/X11R6 to the
> last backup, no differences found.
Did you also check the dotfiles at home? Try entering as a differrent
(new) user to see if the problem remains.
Christoph Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
^X^C
q
quit
:q
^C
end
x
exit
ZZ
^D
?
Hi!
After a power outage a few hours ago, I fsck´ed (no problems found),
and tried to re-startx. X and fvwm95 came up, but with a somewhat
spooky colormap, like some kind of green (eg the background, which was
simply grey) was missing.
I´ve re-ran XF86Setup, apt-get remove´d + install´ed
Hello everybody,
I have a question regarding the fvwm95 configuration.
After I upgraded to 2.2, the little clock dissapeared from the lower right
hand conner of the task bar. Could someone tell me how to get it back?
thank you
Lazar
In Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:56:02 +0100, de profundis Jose Alberto Lobo <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> cum veritas scribat
lobo> Hi!,
lobo>
lobo> I run Debian slink and use fvwm95 window manager --I know it's a
little
lobo> primitive, but very robust and easy to handle. I have h
Hi!,
I run Debian slink and use fvwm95 window manager --I know it's a little
primitive, but very robust and easy to handle. I have however a silly problem
with the icons in the button bar: there are certain applications --netscape,
xfig, xterm, etc.-- I launch by clicking o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi
I get this fvwm95 message every time I start X. It doesn't seem to be a
fatal error.
the eror is:
*FvwmTaskBar: Failed
request: B
adPixmap (invalid Pixmap para
were moving it)... weird, isn't it? Now, to be true, I've only noticed
that behavior when running Netscape under fvwm95 (on
KDE it seems to run OK, and I haven't tried it with WMaker, Enlightenment or
whatever)... Also, from time to time (specially when I
try to be a bit quicker - o
You could try a ~/.fvwm95rc (which ?would? overide the /etc one).
The relavent sections of mine are:
AddToMenu /Debian
+ "Debian Menu" Title
# note I only use my own menus, you might want:
# Read /etc//menudefs.hook, for the autogenerated stuff
Read .fvwm95/menudefs.hook
Read .f
Since I upgraded to Debian 2.1, fvwm95 has been acting up. The
FvwmButtons seem to be working okay, and the TaskBar shows up, but the
StartMenu doesn't work. The button is there, and putting the mouse over it
shows the "Click here to start" message, but clicking on it does nothi
Hi,
I am having problems compiling fvwm95 on Slink. I installed the
required development libraries from the oldlibs packages. Here is an
example of the problem :
debian$gcc -o FvwmAudio FvwmAudio.o -L../../libs
-L/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/lib -L/usr/i486-linuxchecker/lib -lfvwm95 -lXpm
HTH
Rich
Adam Archibald wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I wonder if anyone can help me. I have a quick question re the main
> generated menu in Debian's fvwm95. What I want to do is configure it so
> that when I click on one of the submenus (say `Apps' for instance) it
> st
Hi folks,
I wonder if anyone can help me. I have a quick question re the main
generated menu in Debian's fvwm95. What I want to do is configure it so
that when I click on one of the submenus (say `Apps' for instance) it
stays up, regardless of where else on the screen/the main menu I
Adam Archibald wrote:
> Sorry to bother you, but I have a quick question re the main generated
> menu in Debian's fvwm95. What I want to do is configure it so that when I
> click on one of the submenus (say `Apps' for instance) it stays up,
> regardless of where else on the
On 25 Jan 99 at 18:22, Tom Persons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
{on having a bad install of fvwm95...}
> ...This is a new version of fvwm95, based on fvwm95-2.0.43a, with a
> few patches applied and with a few new or modified modules
> (FvwmTaskBar,FvwmWharf,FvwmScript...)
>
>
e lines in the xinitrc file. Here are the instructions:
>
> This is a new version of fvwm95, based on
> fvwm95-2.0.43a,
> with a few patches applied and with a few new or modified
> modules (FvwmTaskBar,FvwmWharf,FvwmScript...)
>
> Installation should be as simple as:
> tar x
s a new version of fvwm95, based on fvwm95-2.0.43a,
with a few patches applied and with a few new or modified
modules (FvwmTaskBar,FvwmWharf,FvwmScript...)
Installation should be as simple as:
tar xvzf fvwm95-2.0.43b.tar.gz
cd fvwm95-2.0.43b
./configure
make
make install
Further details can
in X and fvwm95, an envelope symbol appeared in the bottom right
hand corner of the screen, which went white if there was unread mail in
the file above. It also beeped on new mail arrival, and on double-click
tried to launch pine (although I don't have it, so it didn't work).
I then adde
On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 04:15:38PM -0500, Matt Kopishke wrote:
>
> What's the simplest way to completly over ride the menus the are used by
> default under fvwm95, for certen users (probly using ~/.fvwm95 and
> hook files?). I need a simple menu (to apps, Netscape & Wordperfe
Matt, go to /usr/doc/menu and it will explain how to make your own menu entries.
On 09-Jan-99 Matt Kopishke wrote:
> What's the simplest way to completly over ride the menus the are used by
> default under fvwm95, for certen users (probly using ~/.fvwm95 and
> hook files?). I need
What's the simplest way to completly over ride the menus the are used by
default under fvwm95, for certen users (probly using ~/.fvwm95 and
hook files?). I need a simple menu (to apps, Netscape & Wordperfect) for
our xterinals, the default debian-menu is confusing, and give them acce
Does anybody else experience this:
I have many many packages installed on my system, including the menu
system which modifies the window manager menus if they support it. I
have both fvwm2 and fvwm95 installed, however, the Debian Menus with the
apps they have are very very different. Some entries
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Thought that someone here might find this message useful.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FVWM95] Taskbar plugins
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 10 Nov 1998 10:43:38 -0500
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5
I'm impressed - I made a slight error in packaging up fvwm95 for
hamm, such that bo upgrades aren't as smooth as they could be - oops.
> Anyhow - Everything seems to have installed fine. But I have now
> noticed that my windows manager fvwm95 does not seem to read my
> prior config
ws manager fvwm95 does not seem to read my prior config file in my home
directory
The config info was in /home/doug/.fvwm2rc95 on my bo system and everything
seemed to work fine.
The first lines of my window-managers
/usr/X11R6/bin/fvwm95
/usr/X11R6/bin/fvwm2
...
What do I need to do so my windo
> I installed Debian 2.0 with fvwm95 as the window manager. I'd now like to
> use kde. I installed all the packages and am able to run kde, but it seems
> to be running on top of fvwm95.
>
> How can I change the window manager to kde?
> Where is the window manager invoked?
On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Edward J Young wrote:
>
>
> I installed Debian 2.0 with fvwm95 as the window manager. I'd now like to
> use kde. I installed all the packages and am able to run kde, but it seems
> to be running on top of fvwm95.
>
> How can I change the window m
I installed Debian 2.0 with fvwm95 as the window manager. I'd now like to
use kde. I installed all the packages and am able to run kde, but it seems
to be running on top of fvwm95.
How can I change the window manager to kde?
Where is the window manager invoked?
Thanx in advance.
Benno Overeinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the Fvwm95 window manager and has enabled the infamous
> FvwmTaskBarAutoHide option.
>
> With Debian 1.3, the Fvwm95 taskbar appeared automagically if the
> mouse hits the bottom of a virtual desktop
Hi,
I am using the Fvwm95 window manager and has enabled the infamous
FvwmTaskBarAutoHide option.
With Debian 1.3, the Fvwm95 taskbar appeared automagically if the
mouse hits the bottom of a virtual desktop (i.e., generated a certain
event which made the taskbar to be raised). However, if the
h X help needed !!!
If it had failed, dselect would have told you. However, fvwm is not the same
package as fvwm95.
>
>Anyway, I have now downloaded the "latest" release from the fvwm95 home
>page which is supposedly mostly self installing, self-configuring.
Probably n
fees, no strings attached.
| Anyway, I have now downloaded the "latest" release from the fvwm95 home
| page which is supposedly mostly self installing, self-configuring.
There is a fvwm95 debian package which should serve you well. Have you
tried it? Install it using dselect and check
d the "latest" release from the fvwm95 home
page which is supposedly mostly self installing, self-configuring.
Having unpacked the files & running the config programme I run into errors.
The config file creates its own makefile which, when used by make returns
errors.
If you need a copy
d the "latest" release from the fvwm95 home
page which is supposedly mostly self installing, self-configuring.
Having unpacked the files & running the config programme I run into errors.
The config file creates its own makefile which, when used by make returns
errors.
If you need a copy
m. I can use it to spawn new xterms and run
> netscape (which I'm using to send this), but I miss being able to click
> an Icon to run netscape, and the clock, etc. ps shows that fvwm95 is
> running for me. What must I do to restore order. I'm a command-line
> kind of
ape (which I'm using to send this), but I miss being able to click
an Icon to run netscape, and the clock, etc. ps shows that fvwm95 is
running for me. What must I do to restore order. I'm a command-line
kind of guy, I'm afraid I find the X environment a bit daunting. TIA
fo
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have read the documentation on fvwm95 and on FvwmButtons but I am
> still at a loss to decide how I would override definitions of buttons
> in
> /etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm95rc
>
> What I would like to do
I have read the documentation on fvwm95 and on FvwmButtons but I am
still at a loss to decide how I would override definitions of buttons
in
/etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm95rc
What I would like to do is to use rclock rather than xclock for one of
the buttons. (rclock can be
I have installed the new version of FVWM95 (2.0.43b-2)
the FvwmAudio did not work (no sound heard), I had to use
FvwmAudio from an older version that works fine.
Does any one know why or how can I find why?
Thanks
-Oz
Quick question... Where is the configuration information for the initial xterm
window which is opened when xdm starts up fvwm95?
I like the font in the additional xterm windows and the font in the initial
xterm windows is harder to read. Thanks!
--
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek
> Is it a bug?
Looks like it, but I cannot find it.
> I spent a couple of hours the other day learning how to edit the
> config files for fvwm95, and got some nice features working, when...
>
> Lo and behold, I found a NEW version of fvwm95 in hamm...
Hamm is "unstab
Is it a bug?
I spent a couple of hours the other day learning how to edit the
config files for fvwm95, and got some nice features working, when...
Lo and behold, I found a NEW version of fvwm95 in hamm...
When I installed it, it stomped on my newly edited config files. It
didn't ask.
IRC? there is a debian channel? what is it?
joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > I cannot seem to successfully load menu entries in fvwm95 by creating
> > menus files in /usr/lib/menus for the following two apps:
> > xpostit+
> > xdvi
>
> Were you the one on
> I cannot seem to successfully load menu entries in fvwm95 by creating
> menus files in /usr/lib/menus for the following two apps:
> xpostit+
> xdvi
Were you the one on IRC who complained about that too?
Sorry, but you ran away before I could answer you.
> I have tried variation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I cannot seem to successfully load menu entries in fvwm95 by creating
menus files in /usr/lib/menus for the following two apps:
xpostit+
xdvi
and then running update-menus at the prompt
Although I have successfully created for the below listed apps:
zircon
> Greetings! My 1.3 upgrade also wiped out my
> /etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm2rc95 file. A simple link:
>
> system.fvwm2rc95 -> system.fvwm2rc95.orig-dist
>
> though, fixed the problem. Is this a bug?
If two people saw the same thing, then it must be a bug.
It is, howe
Greetings! My 1.3 upgrade also wiped out my
/etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm2rc95 file. A simple link:
system.fvwm2rc95 -> system.fvwm2rc95.orig-dist
though, fixed the problem. Is this a bug?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Camm Magu
-[snip]
:>
:> Anyway, the "old" system.fvwm2rc95 is somewhere in
:/usr/doc/fvwm95//system*
:>
:
:I didn't mean old, old, but my old fvwm2rc95 for menu had the taskbar,
:and
:had decent colors. This new one was black, no taskbar, an
On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
> >
> > What happened to fvwm95, it seems the taskbar is missing, and the color's
> > have been changed to say the least. Does anyone have an old copy of their
> > system.fvwm95 file around, so that I can get fvwm
>
> What happened to fvwm95, it seems the taskbar is missing, and the color's
> have been changed to say the least. Does anyone have an old copy of their
> system.fvwm95 file around, so that I can get fvwm95 back to the way it
> was.
Strange. The postinst was changed to de
What happened to fvwm95, it seems the taskbar is missing, and the color's
have been changed to say the least. Does anyone have an old copy of their
system.fvwm95 file around, so that I can get fvwm95 back to the way it
was.
Thanks,
Shaya
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mai
Victor Torrico wrote:
> Thanks for clearing up what's going on. Looking forward to -10.3
> version of fvwm95 window manager.
Will it be based on fvwm95-2.0.43a-Autoconf ?
Peter
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t;
> Now here you are absolutely right. Other people have reported that
> simply rebuilding -10.2 fixed the missing modules, so that's what I
> plan to do when I release 10.3, but why-oh-why they are missing in
> 10.2
> is completely beyond me.
>
> --
> joost wittevee
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 1997, Victor Torrico wrote:
> >
> > > Installing -10.deb version of fvwm95 gives me a taskbar. Installing
> >
> > > -10.2.deb ve
Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 29 Jun 1997, Victor Torrico wrote:
>
> > Installing -10.deb version of fvwm95 gives me a taskbar. Installing
>
> > -10.2.deb version of fvwm95 gives no taskbar.
> >
> > How does one get a taskbar after installing -
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Jun 1997, Victor Torrico wrote:
> Installing -10.deb version of fvwm95 gives me a taskbar. Installing
> -10.2.deb version of fvwm95 gives no taskbar.
>
> How does one get a taskbar after installing -10.2.deb version of fvwm95?
i had the same problem. You can check
Installing -10.deb version of fvwm95 gives me a taskbar. Installing
-10.2.deb version of fvwm95 gives no taskbar.
How does one get a taskbar after installing -10.2.deb version of fvwm95?
Cheers,
Victor
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
In an earlier message, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
>I'm running Debian 1.3 with some packages from unstable (aka hamm),
>eg. libc6, xfree 3.3 and several packages depending on it. I noticed
> the following (minor) problems:
> 1) DOSEmu
> I installed DOSEmu 0.66.6 and when I run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler) wrote:
(about dosemu 0.66.6)
> Well, fdos seems to have problems
> with lredir. I only get garbage on drive d: (which should actually be the
> whole linux fs).
>From the dosemu mailing list, it appears that lredir does not work
with fdos, due to missing f
only get garbage on drive d: (which should actually be the
whole linux fs).
BTW, why does DOSEmu use libm.so.5 AND libm.so.6 (as reported by ldd)? Is
this really normal?
2) fvwm95
I had a problem with fvwm95-2.0.42a-10. It didn't contain the file
system.fvwmrc95 in /etc/X11/fvwm95, so I copied
>>Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm running Debian 1.3 with some packages from unstable (aka hamm),
>eg. libc6, xfree 3.3 and several packages depending on it. I noticed
>the following (minor) problems:
>
>1) DOSEmu
>I installed DOSEmu 0.66.6
[ snip ]
>DOSEmu complains about missing "hdim
> 2) fvwm95
> I had a problem with fvwm95-2.0.42a-10. It didn't contain the file
> system.fvwmrc95 in /etc/X11/fvwm95, so I copied system.fvwmrc95.dpkg-dist.
> Yesterday I installed fvwm95-2.0.42a-10.2 because I thought the bug was
> corrected. But unfortunately after installat
> Just installed it myself, from what I remember there is no default config
> file. You have to rename one of the installed config files to what
> fvwm95-2 is looking for (forgot the name right now).
This appears to be right, indeed (I would suggest that the postinst
of fvwm95-2 cop
Just installed it myself, from what I remember there is no default config
file. You have to rename one of the installed config files to what
fvwm95-2 is looking for (forgot the name right now).
Matthew
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> I don't know what happended, but what I
I don't know what happended, but what I upgraded from fvwm95 to fvwm95-2,
fvwm95-2 doesn't work anymore. I'm not even getting any errors in the
.xsession-errors file or on the console. Did the new installation
wiped-out the default settings or is just not working?
Alberto Ruiz
[
>> Anyway, it runs fine. The only thing is I'm having a difficult time
>> creating a menu item for fvwm95 minding, though, that it executes
>> properly when I just type in "swriter3" in an xterm.
>>
>> The entry in .fvwm95 I'm using looks l
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Victor Torrico wrote:
>
> Where does one download StarOffice? Is Motif required or does Lesstiff
> do the job?
>
ftp.gwdg.de in /pub/linux/staroffice
Motif, but there is a statically linked binary available.
There are some icons for StarOffice in the contrib directory at
Paul Serice wrote:
>
> Oh boy. I've downloaded and installed StarOffice. I can't believe
> they're giving this away.
>
> Anyway, it runs fine. The only thing is I'm having a difficult time
> creating a menu item for fvwm95 minding, though, that it e
W Paul Mills wrote:
>
> Two things:
> 1. You could include the full path.
> 2. Environment variables. If you are using xdm to start X, you
> can "source sd.sh" (or whatever filename your use) in your
> $HOME/.xsession file to set the environment as you log in.
> Then your menu
;ve downloaded and installed StarOffice. I can't believe
> they're giving this away.
>
> Anyway, it runs fine. The only thing is I'm having a difficult time
> creating a menu item for fvwm95 minding, though, that it executes
> properly when I just type in "swrit
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Paul Serice wrote:
> Oh boy. I've downloaded and installed StarOffice. I can't believe
> they're giving this away.
>
> Anyway, it runs fine. The only thing is I'm having a difficult time
> creating a menu item for fvwm95 minding, though,
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Paul Serice wrote:
> Oh boy. I've downloaded and installed StarOffice. I can't believe
> they're giving this away.
>
> Anyway, it runs fine. The only thing is I'm having a difficult time
> creating a menu item for fvwm95 minding, though,
Oh boy. I've downloaded and installed StarOffice. I can't believe
they're giving this away.
Anyway, it runs fine. The only thing is I'm having a difficult time
creating a menu item for fvwm95 minding, though, that it executes
properly when I just type in "swriter3&qu
ok the full story :-)
I run the svga server with fvwm95-2 as window manager. Since i have a
'belgian' azerty keyboard the XF86config file contains:
Section "Keyboard"
Protocol"Standard"
XkbRules"xfree86"
XkbModel"p
PROTECTED]>
> To: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: FVWM95 Configuration File Wanted
>
> Hi,
>
> Would someone be really kind and eMail me a copy that works well of
> their FVWM95 Window Manager file "fvwm2rc95" aka "system.fvwm2rc95".
&g
Here's another problem from Victor. Can someone give him a hand?
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 15 20:14:12 1996
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 19:12:44 -0500
From: Victor Torrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FVWM95 Configuration File Wanted
H
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ken Gaugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought it would be fun to build fvwm95, so I got the file
>fvwm95-2_0_42a-Autoconf.tar, unpacked it, did the ./configure
>and then the make. I got lots of interesting but not very
>funny
By the way, as for xpm.h missing, I already installed
xpm4.7-3.4g-5.deb, so not sure where this file is supposed
to be. Did a find, and it is not on my machine...
--
Ken Gaugler
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://users.aimnet.com/~keng
"The life of a Repo Man is always INTENSE..."
I thought it would be fun to build fvwm95, so I got the file
fvwm95-2_0_42a-Autoconf.tar, unpacked it, did the ./configure
and then the make. I got lots of interesting but not very
funny messages like:
gcc -o FvwmIconMan FvwmIconMan.o fvwm.o globals.o winlist.o xmanager.o
-L../../libs -L/usr
Klee Dienes wrote:
> There's a preliminary packaging of fvwm95 in
> ftp.sedona.com:/pub/linux/debian.
>
> It works fine, but currently conflicts with the standard fvwm and
> fvwm2. Perhaps you'd be willing to download my copy as a starting
fvwm95 shares many fil
There's a preliminary packaging of fvwm95 in
ftp.sedona.com:/pub/linux/debian.
It works fine, but currently conflicts with the standard fvwm and
fvwm2. Perhaps you'd be willing to download my copy as a starting
point and take over maintenance of the package? You can find
info
I have installed fvwm95, and keep running into the same errors,
-lfvwm95-2 file or directory not found...
X11/xdm.h file or directory not found...
yes, I added . to my PATH, (why my base install did not add it,
I do not know...
I installed fvwm2 on my system and it works, and I have
89 matches
Mail list logo
