Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Unfortunately the new DebianMenu file does not read
> main-menu-pre.hook, so it is not possible to put your own stuff at
> the start of the menu, so my customised menu has my stuff after the
> standard debian stuff now. This I had to do in menudefs.hook where
> I used to
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Stefan Bellon wrote:
> > I don't see how the upstream FVWM mailing lists could help me with a
> > problem of the packaging of the latest Debian FVWM package.
> You know for sure that it is packaging problem and not an upstream
> change?
Yes, of course. It's just the way
Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Once upon a time Stefan Bellon said...
[snip]
> > I copied the old contents of /etx/X11/fvmw/* to my ~/.fvwm so that
> > I maintain the state that I had until two days ago. But somehow
> > this is still unsatisfying.
> I went into /etc/X11/fvwm and copied all the .dpkg
Once upon a time Stefan Bellon said...
>
> Oh, the new version of FVWM has an impressive configuration "wizard".
> It's really not bad. But you cannot configure everything. And the
> configuration files it produces are split over a dozen files in
> ~/.fvwm/. So, if I want to add my more special ch
Stefan Bellon wrote:
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
Stefan Bellon wrote:
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
Unless someone knows this, my only solution is to subscribe to the
mailinglist and ask :-(
Which mailing list?
http://www.fvwm.org/contact/
I don't see how the upstream FVWM mailing lists could
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Stefan Bellon wrote:
> > hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
> >>Unless someone knows this, my only solution is to subscribe to the
> >>mailinglist and ask :-(
> >
> > Which mailing list?
> http://www.fvwm.org/contact/
I don't see how the upstream FVWM mailing lists could h
Stefan Bellon wrote:
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux unstable on my box here. For some
reason I was running fvwm 2.4.16-2 till today (not sure why it
didn't get updated). Just right now there was an update to fvwm
2.5.10-2. The problem now is, that I had m
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Stefan Bellon wrote:
> > I'm running Debian GNU/Linux unstable on my box here. For some
> > reason I was running fvwm 2.4.16-2 till today (not sure why it
> > didn't get updated). Just right now there was an update to fvwm
> > 2.5.10-2. The problem now is, that I had my who
Stefan Bellon wrote:
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux unstable on my box here. For some reason I
was running fvwm 2.4.16-2 till today (not sure why it didn't get
updated). Just right now there was an update to fvwm 2.5.10-2. The
problem now is, that I had my whole configuration in a file
~/.fvwm/post.h
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux unstable on my box here. For some reason I
was running fvwm 2.4.16-2 till today (not sure why it didn't get
updated). Just right now there was an update to fvwm 2.5.10-2. The
problem now is, that I had my whole configuration in a file
~/.fvwm/post.hook which got include
10 matches
Mail list logo
