Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-03 Thread Charlie
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 19:34:48 + Vincent mentioned this: Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > If you open /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook and take a look at the first > few lines, it says that the file is auto-generated (which is the

Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-03 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Charlie wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:47:43 +1000 Charlie sent: > >> >> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: >> Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires >> gvfs). >> >> &

Re: [solved] fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-02 Thread Charlie
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 17:47:43 +1000 Charlie sent: > > On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: > Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires > gvfs). > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie > > wrote: > > >

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-02 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 17:33:43 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: > >

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-10-01 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Charlie wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: > Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires > gvfs). > >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie >> wrote: >> > >&

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-30 Thread Charlie
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:51:41 -0700 Vincent mentioned this: Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: > >

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-29 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Charlie wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: > Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires > gvfs). > >> >> >> Steve Litt writes: >> >> >> >> Becau

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-27 Thread lee
Charlie writes: >> On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: >> >> Please check out [1] --- let me know if it works for you and how you >> like it. >> >> >> [1]: https://github.com/lee-/fvwm > >Hello Lee, > > I've just had a cursory read and you have put a lot of effo

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-27 Thread Charlie
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:20:27 +0200 lee mentioned this: Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs). > > >> Steve Litt writes: > >> > >> Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some > >> documentation o

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-27 Thread lee
>> Steve Litt writes: >> >> Because you use fvwm on a regular basis, you should write some >> documentation on it. Please check out [1] --- let me know if it works for you and how you like it. [1]: https://github.com/lee-/fvwm -- Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power. -- To

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-23 Thread Charlie
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:40:21 +0200 lee sent: > These two functions are described in the man page. > > BTW, either IconMan or IconBox are deprecated --- I don't remember > which one. Thanks Lee, It was ButtonBar for laptop. I removed that entry in my menudefs.hook and it is gone, no longer a wor

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-23 Thread lee
Charlie writes: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent: > >> Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what >> things? > > Lee, > > If I can jump in here re: fvwm. [fvwm 2.6.5] On my desktop I have this > thing. I has two columns of squares which are labelled FileMGR - xv > -gview an

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-23 Thread Charlie
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent: > Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what > things? Sorry for the noise Lee. I found what the thing was called. It was a laptop ButtonBar and I got rid of it. So it's done. Thanks for your help, Charlie -- Registered Linux User:

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-22 Thread Charlie
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:54:43 +0200 lee sent: > Why are things going wrong with it for you, and what > things? Lee, If I can jump in here re: fvwm. [fvwm 2.6.5] On my desktop I have this thing. I has two columns of squares which are labelled FileMGR - xv -gview and all sorts of things. To write

Re: fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-22 Thread lee
Steve Litt writes: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200 > lee wrote: > >> So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more >> flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to >> arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even >> wastes less

fvwm: was i3 sticky/floating windows (brasero requires gvfs)

2014-09-21 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:48:13 +0200 lee wrote: > So i3 doesn't have any advantages for me --- fvwm is much more > flexible and without the utter confusion that arises when you try to > arrange a number of windows in a particular manner with i3. It even > wastes less screen space than i3 because I