On 12/20/05, Noah Dain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any fuse filesystem will incur quite a bit of overhead. If you arelooking for high throughput, fuse is not what you want.
ok, i had read about this but anything than smbfs would be better!! ;-)
try using cifs. smbfs is deprecated. Both have their
On 12/19/05, fabrizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi everybody.
> At the moment i'm using smbmount and smbfs utilities, but i'm not satisfied
> with this tool, cause using gnome with nautilus and browsing dirs or shares
> is really slow and not efficient.
> so i&
hi everybody.
At the moment i'm using smbmount and smbfs utilities, but i'm not
satisfied with this tool, cause using gnome with nautilus and browsing
dirs or shares is really slow and not efficient.
so i'm looking at fusefs + smbfs. is someone using it? how are the performances? is
3 matches
Mail list logo
