Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-19 Thread Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar
-> I have ftpd-ssl running, it seems to work very well. -> -> As far as I can tell it just uses port 22, neat, this seems to make the -> problems of ftp, port, firewalls, passive clients etc, go away, just open and -> forward port 22. No. the FTP protocol defines 2 TCP connecti

Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-19 Thread Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar
-> A simple (perhabs stupid) question concerning this topic: Is there a way -> to disable logins over ssh while permitting sftp-access? there is a possibility to give users shell that won't allow them log in, while they will be able to run sftp-server. -- Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:21:59AM +1100, Joyce, Matthew wrote: > Children's Cancer Institute Australia is the only independent medical > research institute in Australia solely devoted to research into the causes, > prevention and cure of childhood cancer. Our vision is to save the lives of > all c

RE: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-16 Thread Joyce, Matthew
> I don't know of a single native Windows or Mac ftp client > that supports it. For that matter, the last time I checked > support in the UNIX world wasn't that great either. Most of > my ftp is through wget or ncftp (in both Linux and Windows) > and I don't think either one supports ssl-ftp.

Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-16 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 06:22:28PM +0100, Burkhard Ritter wrote: > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Michael Heironimus wrote: Hi, > > I think it's partly a chicken-and-egg problem. Why use it when almost no > > software supports it and almost no sites use it? Why enable it on your > > site when almost nobody

Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-16 Thread Burkhard Ritter
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Michael Heironimus wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:09:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote: > > Probably more people would use it if more ftp clients supported it... > > I don't know how well it's supported in MS and Apple worlds... > > I don't know of a single native Windows

Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-15 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:09:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote: > Probably more people would use it if more ftp clients supported it... > I don't know how well it's supported in MS and Apple worlds... I don't know of a single native Windows or Mac ftp client that supports it. For that matter, the

Re: ftpd-ssl

2003-02-15 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 01:52:17AM +, mjoyce wrote: > I have ftpd-ssl running, it seems to work very well. > > As far as I can tell it just uses port 22, neat, this seems to make the > problems of ftp, port, firewalls, passive clients etc, go away, just open and > forward p

ftpd-ssl

2003-02-15 Thread mjoyce
I have ftpd-ssl running, it seems to work very well. As far as I can tell it just uses port 22, neat, this seems to make the problems of ftp, port, firewalls, passive clients etc, go away, just open and forward port 22. Is this right ? if so, i'm surprised more people don;t use it.