Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-17 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, William Ono wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: > > > having ALL: ALL in hosts.deny and ALL: 192.168.1.* in hosts.allow worked > > perfectly. hosts.allow was supposed to override hosts.deny. When did this > > change? > > You want "ALL: 192.168.1." withou

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-17 Thread William Ono
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: > having ALL: ALL in hosts.deny and ALL: 192.168.1.* in hosts.allow worked > perfectly. hosts.allow was supposed to override hosts.deny. When did this > change? You want "ALL: 192.168.1." without the star at the end. The behaviour you mention is AFA

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-16 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Bruce Chapman wrote: > >longer ftp or telnet to my machine. ("421 Service not available, remote > >server has closed connection", and "Connection closed by foreign host"). > > In /etc/hosts.deny try commenting out the line ALL: PARANOID The problem was not ALL: PARANOID, it

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-16 Thread Jesse Jacobsen
that hasn't had any of these problems. Maybe it's just not completely updated, or maybe I did something wrong this time. Hope this helps someone, Jesse On 06/16/99 at 12:27:07, Dr. Karl-Wilhelm Schulte wrote concerning "Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade": > On Wed, Jun 16,

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-16 Thread Dr. Karl-Wilhelm Schulte
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 12:03:15PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: > > >longer ftp or telnet to my machine. ("421 Service not available, remote > > >server has closed connection", and "Connection closed by foreign host"). Have you noticed, that some net services have now their own debs in the net

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-16 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
> >longer ftp or telnet to my machine. ("421 Service not available, remote > >server has closed connection", and "Connection closed by foreign host"). > > In /etc/hosts.deny try commenting out the line ALL: PARANOID Thanks. That didn't help with the ftp/telnet problem, but I think it solved anoth

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-16 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
> For the ftp problem, take a look at /etc/inetd.conf and see if the ftp > line has been commented out. If so, remove the octothorpe (#). There > might be more than one of these lines; you should only enable one. These two lines are uncommented in inetd.conf: ftp stream tcp now

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-15 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 03:02:54PM -0400, Chris Flipse wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 08:40:42PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: > > >I have, however, recently run into a problem. Since I upgraded, I can no > >longer ftp or telnet to my machine. ("421 Service not available, remote > >server has

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-15 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
> >I have, however, recently run into a problem. Since I upgraded, I can no > >longer ftp or telnet to my machine. ("421 Service not available, remote > >server has closed connection", and "Connection closed by foreign host"). > >I'm not sure if this started happening when I installed potato, or wh

RE: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-15 Thread David Karlin
; it. You probably need to do the same. Good luck, --David > -Original Message- > From: Hugo van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 12:41 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade > > > Hello!

Re: ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-15 Thread Chris Flipse
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 08:40:42PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: >I have, however, recently run into a problem. Since I upgraded, I can no >longer ftp or telnet to my machine. ("421 Service not available, remote >server has closed connection", and "Connection closed by foreign host"). >I'm not

ftp/telnet fails since upgrade

1999-06-15 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
Hello! I have been using Debian for a while now (before that I used RH5.1). I really prefer Debian, its packaging system, and the fact that it works so nicely from a shell. (You don't need to load X before configuring stuff.) IPMasquerading and the like was a lot easier to set up. I have, however