Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition. very slow. how to tell what is happening?

2008-05-13 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
This is no answer to the question, although it may be of interest: There is an on-going discussion on the linux kernel mailing list about speeding up fsck for ext3, see, e.g. http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/13/3 -- Regards, Jörg-Volker. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-11 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
how much memory it used? If your / fs isn't 1 > > TB, and you have 24 hrs to spend, you could check just that 1 TB > > filesysem with top (or something) running and see. > > I did peak once via ssh while I was running fsck.ext3 (at that > time which was close to hour 20

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-10 Thread Mitchell Laks
T hardware raid. > > I don't suppose you know how much memory it used? If your / fs isn't 1 > TB, and you have 24 hrs to spend, you could check just that 1 TB > filesysem with top (or something) running and see. I did peak once via ssh while I was running fsck.ext3 (at

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-10 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:58:02PM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote: > On 07:24 Fri 09 May , NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > > * From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Does anyone know how much memory fsck needs to check a large filesystem? > In my case, the fsck took about 24 hours -

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-09 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/09/08 17:58, Mitchell Laks wrote: > On 07:24 Fri 09 May , NN_il_Confusionario wrote: >>> * From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Does anyone know how much memory fsck needs to check a large filesystem? >>Linkname: Considera

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-09 Thread Mitchell Laks
On 07:24 Fri 09 May , NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > * From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Does anyone know how much memory fsck needs to check a large filesystem? > >Linkname: Considerations when creating ext3 filesystems - Ext4 > URL: > http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-08 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
> * From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Does anyone know how much memory fsck needs to check a large filesystem? Linkname: Considerations when creating ext3 filesystems - Ext4 URL: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Considerations_when_creating_ext3_filesystems#Memory_n

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition

2008-05-08 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
> * From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Does anyone know how much memory fsck needs to check a large filesystem? some (rather old) information is contained in Linkname: E2fsprogs Release Notes URL: http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs-release.html for example, it s

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition. very slow. how to tell what is happening?

2008-05-08 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
You say its very slow. Does anyone know how much memory fsck needs to check a large filesystem? Does it take more memory for a larger fs in a linear fashion? E.g. OpenBSD needs 1 MB per 1 GB fs size to fsck. If the box has less memory than this, fsck hits swap and really slows down. Is this 1 T

Re: fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition. very slow. how to tell what is happening?

2008-05-08 Thread Ron Johnson
> then nothing > > what to do to get some kind of (ascii :)) graphic or other > feedback as to how it is doing? It just sits there. > > fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 > > the v here is not very verbose :(. $ man fsck [snip] -C [ fd ] Display completion/p

fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 on 1 terabyte partition. very slow. how to tell what is happening?

2008-05-08 Thread Mitchell Laks
. fsck.ext3 -yv /dev/sda1 the v here is not very verbose :(. Thanks, Mitchell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-02-02 15:15:36, schrieb Paul Johnson: > On Feb 2, 2008 11:01 AM, Manon Metten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before I change something, I would like to know the current > > setings. How do I find those? > > I believe the manual page for tune2fs would be able to tell you how to > display th

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Paul Johnson
On Feb 2, 2008 11:01 AM, Manon Metten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Before I change something, I would like to know the current > setings. How do I find those? I believe the manual page for tune2fs would be able to tell you how to display the current filesystem options. -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PRO

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Paul Johnson
On Feb 2, 2008 2:53 AM, Jan Willem Stumpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After converting my file system to ext3, I thought there would be > no more lengthy fsck's every 20 or so boot-ups. But they still > happen. > > Some Googling revealed different opinions; some people say "ext3 > does not need p

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Manon Metten
Hi, On 2/2/08, Sam Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I set mine for 60 days or 100 mounts. > Before I change something, I would like to know the current setings. How do I find those? Greetings, Manon.

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Sam Leon
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: After converting my file system to ext3, I thought there would be no more lengthy fsck's every 20 or so boot-ups. But they still happen. Some Googling revealed different opinions; some people say "ext3 does not need periodic fsck's", others say "even with ext3, it is be

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/08 04:53, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > After converting my file system to ext3, I thought there would be > no more lengthy fsck's every 20 or so boot-ups. But they still > happen. Correct. That's the primary ext4 design goal. The benefit of

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-02-02 11:53 +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > After converting my file system to ext3, I thought there would be > no more lengthy fsck's every 20 or so boot-ups. But they still > happen. You can increase the number of mounts between checks with "tune2fs -c", see tune2fs(8). > Some Googl

Re: fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:53:46 +0100 Jan Willem Stumpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Jan, > After converting my file system to ext3, I thought there would be > no more lengthy fsck's every 20 or so boot-ups. But they still > happen. Even with ext3, I get checks between 30 and 35 boots per part

fsck.ext3

2008-02-02 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
After converting my file system to ext3, I thought there would be no more lengthy fsck's every 20 or so boot-ups. But they still happen. Some Googling revealed different opinions; some people say "ext3 does not need periodic fsck's", others say "even with ext3, it is best to fsck every N boots, be

fstab entries for external USB hard drives led to fsck.ext3 failure on boot, bug?

2006-11-01 Thread Michael Bonert
(thanks David for your comments) I haven't figured-out exactly what the problem is. However, I have narrowed it down and more-or-less resolved it for the time being. On booting my Debian system got something like: - [sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /mnt/mdk] fsck.ext3 -a -C0 /dev/hda11 /d

fsck.ext3 at boot - failure

2005-05-05 Thread Peter Crosbie Stevenson
7 (21-Mar-2005) fsck.ext3: No such device or address while trying to open /dev/sdb6 Possibly non-existent or swap device? fsck.ext3: No such device or address while trying to open /dev/sda6 Possibly non-existent or swap device? fsck failed. Please repair manually. CONTROL-D will exit from this

fsck.ext3, losed files in /dev directory

2003-09-25 Thread Marek Veber
Hi, I have more than one experience with losing some special files from /dev directory after computer pover failure on ext3 filesystem. Is this problem of ext3 filesystem or fsck.ext3? (why the files, which are not changed are corrupted ?) Sorry, but I have no report from this "session