Re: fs system for desktop

2006-12-11 Thread Jeff Zhang
On 12/11/06, Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I ran into this. I started with ext2 (the standard) which got corrupted and lost files with power failure. Went to ext3 (ext2 + journal) which was better but __silently__ would lose files. Went to Reiserfs which would get corrupted by rei

Re: fs system for desktop

2006-12-11 Thread Albert Dengg
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:25:47PM +0530, Amit Joshi wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 18:09, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Dec 11 06:16 -0600]: > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > which fs system (jfs, xfs or future ext4)

Re: fs system for desktop

2006-12-11 Thread Amit Joshi
On Monday 11 December 2006 18:09, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Dec 11 06:16 -0600]: > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > which fs system (jfs, xfs or future ext4) will perform better for > > > desktop usage under occasional power

Re: fs system for desktop

2006-12-11 Thread Nate Bargmann
* Douglas Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Dec 11 06:16 -0600]: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > which fs system (jfs, xfs or future ext4) will perform better for desktop > > usage under occasional power failure circumstance? like recover from power > > failure and f

Re: fs system for desktop

2006-12-11 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jeff Zhang wrote: > which fs system (jfs, xfs or future ext4) will perform better for desktop > usage under occasional power failure circumstance? like recover from power > failure and fragment after long time run. > thanks in advance! I ran into this. I

fs system for desktop

2006-12-11 Thread Jeff Zhang
which fs system (jfs, xfs or future ext4) will perform better for desktop usage under occasional power failure circumstance? like recover from power failure and fragment after long time run. thanks in advance!