On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 08:20:16PM -0500, Michael Procario wrote:
> is the slowpoke and that is not my responsibility. If I could survive with
> g77 I would do so. ABSOFT is not that great advantage over g77 in my case
> except for the fortran structures.
I'm using the Portland Group F90 and H
I have used the Absoft compiler because it supported Vax style fortran
structures which we needed for some code we were porting. It is OK as
a compiler. I needed it to work with g77 since we used several libraries built
with g77 which proved to be very difficult to compile with ABSOFT due to
ma
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have a large application currently running on Dec Alpha 500/500 machines
> which we are investigating porting to a Linux platform. It consist of a
> SmallTalk engine that uses C and Fortran routines to do it's actual work.
> While all the Fortran c
Hi All,
We have a large application currently running on Dec Alpha 500/500 machines
which we are investigating porting to a Linux platform. It consist of a
SmallTalk engine that uses C and Fortran routines to do it's actual work.
While all the Fortran compiles with g77/egcs we have some issues wi
4 matches
Mail list logo
