Re: for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:53:03PM +0200, Smits Katze wrote: > >What would be the difference to simply saying > > > > sudo -i > > The effect should be the same (and the command is more concise). > > Thanks for pointing it out. Thank you for confirmation & sorry for the nitpick :) Cheers -- t

Re: for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

>What would be the difference to simply saying > > sudo -i The effect should be the same (and the command is more concise). Thanks for pointing it out. -- PGP: FF815935D964B268656B43DCB8037830D522909E

Re: for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:54:40PM +0200, Smits Katze wrote: > Debian wiki describes how to configure a read-only rootfs and how to > run apt and unattended-upgrades in such a filesystem: > https://wiki.debian.org/ReadonlyRoot > > I would like to report that I am having considerable success with t

for the adventurous: apt in readonly rootfs

Debian wiki describes how to configure a read-only rootfs and how to run apt and unattended-upgrades in such a filesystem: https://wiki.debian.org/ReadonlyRoot I would like to report that I am having considerable success with the following simple command sequence: sudo su -l unshare -m # in the n