On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 21:07:52 +, michael wrote:
[ snip: some initial misunderstandings ]
> I want to be able to use .eps files. But when I run "latex" (which is a
> symlink for pdflatex) it kaputs since it wants a .pdf/.png file.
>
> Thus my question is "is there a way I can have the 'ol
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 19:54 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 18:15:59 +, michael wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > It was more that even running 'latex' the graphicsx won't accept eps
> > files (whereas the older 'latex' (linked to etex on that box) does).
> > Ta,M
>
> Do you spec
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 18:15:59 +, michael wrote:
[...]
> It was more that even running 'latex' the graphicsx won't accept eps
> files (whereas the older 'latex' (linked to etex on that box) does).
> Ta,M
Do you specify the name of the eps file with or without the extension
".eps"? Newer ve
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 19:03 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:44:02 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:15:48PM +, michael wrote:
> > >
> > > All useful info but my main Q was how come one installation uses etex
> > > and the other pdftex. And how be
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:44:02 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:15:48PM +, michael wrote:
> >
> > All useful info but my main Q was how come one installation uses etex
> > and the other pdftex. And how best to 'standardize'? There may have been
> > a question during inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:42:26PM +, michael wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:44 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:15:48PM +, michael wrote:
> > >
> > > All use
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:44 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:15:48PM +, michael wrote:
> >
> > All useful info but my main Q was how come one installation uses etex
> > and the other pdftex. And how best to 'standardize'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:15:48PM +, michael wrote:
>
> All useful info but my main Q was how come one installation uses etex
> and the other pdftex. And how best to 'standardize'? There may have been
> a question during installation about pdflat
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:12 +0100, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> >> I've two Debian boxes. One one (sarge) it appears that `latex` is really
> >> `e-TeX` whereas on the other (unstable) it appears that `latex` is
> >> really `pdfeTex`. It must have been like this for a while an
Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
>> I've two Debian boxes. One one (sarge) it appears that `latex` is really
>> `e-TeX` whereas on the other (unstable) it appears that `latex` is
>> really `pdfeTex`. It must have been like this for a while and I've not
>
>> appears that 'e_TeX' will read in .eps files but
> I've two Debian boxes. One one (sarge) it appears that `latex` is really
> `e-TeX` whereas on the other (unstable) it appears that `latex` is
> really `pdfeTex`. It must have been like this for a while and I've not
> appears that 'e_TeX' will read in .eps files but 'pdfeTex' won't..
> tell me
Sorry to ask what must be a common question, but I can't find the
answer!
I've two Debian boxes. One one (sarge) it appears that `latex` is really
`e-TeX` whereas on the other (unstable) it appears that `latex` is
really `pdfeTex`. It must have been like this for a while and I've not
had any probl
12 matches
Mail list logo
