On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:10:52 +0100
deloptes wrote:
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend)
> Recently I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears looks good, but after installing later firefox when watching
> some YT it slows down and video breaks. even
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 PM, deloptes wrote:
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
> I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears looks good, but after installing later firefox when watching some
> YT it slows down and video breaks. even low
deloptes writes:
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
> I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears looks good, but after installing later firefox when watching some
> YT it slows down and video breaks. even lowering quality to 360 is not ver
On 12/20/2016 11:10 PM, deloptes wrote:
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
> I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears looks good, but after installing later firefox when watching some
> YT it slows down and video breaks. even lowering qual
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Is the browser slow generally or specifically when you watch videos?
>
> If the latter it may, unintuitively, be a problem with your audio
> driver [1] (like some incompatibility with the newer version of firefox
> or some misconfiguration somewhere).
>
> Worth looking at
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:40:52AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
>
>
> anything else?
>
Is the browser slow generally or specifically when you watch videos?
If the latter it may, unintuitively, be a problem with your _audio_
driver [1] (like some incompatibility with the newer version of firefox
or
Nicolas George wrote:
> Don't watch videos in your browser?
>
welll ... thats not an option
> The UI is awful anyways. I always use youtube-dl (which, despite the
> name, can handle many many video sites, including embedded) plus a real
> video player (MPlayer for me, of course). And it has man
Le decadi 30 frimaire, an CCXXV, deloptes a écrit :
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
> I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears looks good, but after installing later firefox when watching some
> YT it slows down and video breaks. even l
I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
glxgears looks good, but after installing later firefox when watching some
YT it slows down and video breaks. even lowering quality to 360 is not very
good.
I installed older ve
On Monday 09 May 2016 23:38:02 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> Therefore openjdk-7-* is not regarded as an
> upgrade (in the Debian packaging sense) over openjdk-6-*. Instead, they
> are different packages, and both can be installed at the same time.
Therein lies the rub - and the explanation. Thank you.
On Monday 09 May 2016 23:38:02 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> The openjdk-6-* packages are now obsolete and unsupported
> (both by Debian and upstream), and will receive no further security
> updates.
Yes, I have discovered that!!!
Lisi
On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2016 22:37:06 Liam O'Toole wrote:
>> On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > It is also a pity that Wheezy LTS appears not to be a truly viable
>> > proposition for the desktop.
>>
>> True. The software versions are obviously quite old, and not al
On Monday 09 May 2016 17:37:06 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > It is also a pity that Wheezy LTS appears not to be a truly viable
> > proposition for the desktop.
>
> True. The software versions are obviously quite old, and not all
> packages are supported[1]. Previous
On Monday 09 May 2016 22:37:06 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > It is also a pity that Wheezy LTS appears not to be a truly viable
> > proposition for the desktop.
>
> True. The software versions are obviously quite old, and not all
> packages are supported[1]. Previous L
On 2016-05-09, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> It is also a pity that Wheezy LTS appears not to be a truly viable
> proposition for the desktop.
True. The software versions are obviously quite old, and not all
packages are supported[1]. Previous LTS releases did not support
graphical web browsers; I don't k
On 05/09/2016 09:18 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote:
what version of Windows could you purchase today that would
operate on an Intel Pentium M 750?
Windows 10 CLAIMS to run on 32 bit computers. I would have to pay £90.00 to
test it, so I don't intend
On Monday 09 May 2016 17:19:33 Brian wrote:
> On Mon 09 May 2016 at 18:51:56 +0300, Piyavkin wrote:
> > On 09.05.2016 17:18, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > >On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> > >>what version of Windows could you purchase today that would
> > >>operate on an Intel Pentiu
On Mon 09 May 2016 at 18:51:56 +0300, Piyavkin wrote:
> On 09.05.2016 17:18, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >>what version of Windows could you purchase today that would
> >>operate on an Intel Pentium M 750?
> >Windows 10 CLAIMS to run on 32 bit comput
On 09.05.2016 17:18, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote:
what version of Windows could you purchase today that would
operate on an Intel Pentium M 750?
Windows 10 CLAIMS to run on 32 bit computers. I would have to pay £90.00 to
test it, so I don't intend to d
On Monday 09 May 2016 13:18:26 Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> what version of Windows could you purchase today that would
> operate on an Intel Pentium M 750?
Windows 10 CLAIMS to run on 32 bit computers. I would have to pay £90.00 to
test it, so I don't intend to do so. I haven't researched it much.
On Monday 09 May 2016 13:45:39 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux.
>
> Why not? AFAIK my daughter's computer (running 32bit Debian stable) has
> a working flash player (and yes, I'm talking about Adobe's crap plugin,
&
> My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux.
Why not? AFAIK my daughter's computer (running 32bit Debian stable) has
a working flash player (and yes, I'm talking about Adobe's crap plugin,
rather than gnash which sadly seems to have died).
Stefan
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:38:54AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I seem to have hit the following:
> My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists on
> running Flashplayer, she can run an out of date Flashplayer in her current
> Debian system (if I can get
Le primidi 21 floréal, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> It is a sad day when Windows is in any way better for a legacy computer than
> Linux;
It is a sad day when the ability to run crappy and dying proprietary
software is the main criterion to tell which system is better.
Regards,
--
Nicol
Hi,
Lisi wrote:
> In Stable or newer jdk6 would surely have been removed for me by aptitude?
Can you still get jdk6 built from source ? (Possibly a nighmare
of dependencies.)
> It is a sad day when Windows is in any way better for a legacy computer than
> Linux;
Well, talk about concurrent DVD
On Monday 09 May 2016 10:22:57 Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> Lisi Reisz, Mo 09 Mai 2016 10:38:54 CEST:
> > I seem to have hit the following:
> > My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists
> > on running Flashplayer, she can run an out of da
Lisi Reisz, Mo 09 Mai 2016 10:38:54 CEST:
> I seem to have hit the following:
> My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists on
> running Flashplayer, she can run an out of date Flashplayer in her current
> Debian system (if I can get a functional one i
I seem to have hit the following:
My client cannot run an up-to-date Flashplayer on Linux. If she insists on
running Flashplayer, she can run an out of date Flashplayer in her current
Debian system (if I can get a functional one installed) or she can go out,
buy and install Windows. She will
> >
> > Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze.
>
> Hi Lisi,
>
> Instead of setting it up manually, you can install the package
> flashplugin-nonfree, then you don't need to care where its library is
> installed.
>
> Note that when new versions of flashpla
it up manually, you can install the package
flashplugin-nonfree, then you don't need to care where its library is
installed.
Note that when new versions of flashplayer are released you will need
to run, as root,
dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
--
Cheers,
Clive
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Saturday 03 November 2012 21:43:55 Greg Madden wrote:
> On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:47:53 you wrote:
> > If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> > libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I
> > can create it, but I need to know where
On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:47:53 you wrote:
> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I
> can create it, but I need to know where to put it.
>
> Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Saturday 03 November 2012 22:25:18 b.g. white wrote:
> Made the assumption of you using Firefox/Iceweasel, etc.
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:23 PM, b.g. white wrote:
> > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Thank you! :-)
Lisi
> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> If there were a p
Made the assumption of you using Firefox/Iceweasel, etc.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:23 PM, b.g. white wrote:
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
>> libflashplayer.so in it,
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can
> create it, but I need to know where to put it.
>
> Iceweasel 10.0.10, L
If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can
create it, but I need to know where to put it.
Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze.
Thanks,
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
Hi all!
SHORT QUESTION:
Can you see Google Finance graghics *interactively* using
Iceweasel>=15.0 and Shockwave Flash_11.2.r... on Squeeze?
LONG QUESTION:
[using:
flashplayer-mozilla/squeeze uptodate 3:11.2.202.243-dmo3
iceweasel/squeeze-backports uptodate 17.0~a2+20121004042009-1~bpo60+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18.07.2012 13:02, Lisi wrote:
> This time, Flashplayer and Google Chrome both installed fine
I didn't understand do you have package "flashplugin-nonfree". If you
don't, you should install it.
If you cannot find it
endencies with apt-get -f install.
>
> This time, Flashplayer and Google Chrome both installed fine. And both
Chrome
> and Iceweasel have recognised Flashplayer:
>
> Chrome:
>
> Plug-ins
> Plug-ins (4)
> Details
&
I reinstalled Squeeze and I now have Google Chrome installed and mostly
working. I used teh stable deb from Google, ratrher than use the
repositories and install chromium-browser. I used dpkg -i and installed teh
dependencies with apt-get -f install.
This time, Flashplayer and Google Chrome
you. I don't believe in mystery files.
;-)
Maybe I should.
>> If you have more than one flashplayer installed on your machine (gnash +
>> flashplugin-nonfree?) then you might have to play with
>
> I haven't. We are obviously crossing wires badly that you have the
> i
hplayer 7 that were ever installed. Nothing is installed. But there
are some residual files. Removing them is something I can try. What else
can I do? There are no relevant packages on my machine.
> If you have more than one flashplayer installed on your machine (gnash +
> flashplugi
et rid of it, as you say,
> (I have already purged it), not install it.
Well, that makes two of us who are lost then.
> I am trying to find any remaining files in order to rm them, in the
> apparently
> vain hope that Flashplayer will actually play!! And Konqueror says that
raid that you have lost me. I am trying to get rid of it, as you say,
(I have already purged it), not install it.
I am trying to find any remaining files in order to rm them, in the apparently
vain hope that Flashplayer will actually play!! And Konqueror says that the
file is libklashpart.so,
On Sunday 03 June 2012 13:59:44 rjc wrote:
> If your locate database is up to date it means that the file is no
> longer there and your plugins registry simply doesn't reflect that.
Erm, yes. But that still means that I can't play Flashplayer!!
As I mentioned earlier, I think t
On Saturday 26 May 2012 21:02:21 hvw59601 wrote:
> Lisi wrote:
> > Is there a solution to the following problem? (See below) I see that the
> > bug was reported two years ago, so I am tempted to go for purge, but that
> > may leave some detritus. :-(
> >
> > And if I were to purge flashplugin-nonf
Lisi wrote:
Is there a solution to the following problem? (See below) I see that the bug
was reported two years ago, so I am tempted to go for purge, but that may
leave some detritus. :-(
And if I were to purge flashplugin-nonfree, what could I install that would
actually work to play flash?
Is there a solution to the following problem? (See below) I see that the bug
was reported two years ago, so I am tempted to go for purge, but that may
leave some detritus. :-(
And if I were to purge flashplugin-nonfree, what could I install that would
actually work to play flash?
Would I do b
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:25:05PM -0600, Shane Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I use flashplayer-mozilla from the debian-multimedia repository. It
> > updates with apt, so you don't need to run a command like
> > update-flashpl
On Thursday 03 May 2012 01:01:57 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 02/05/12 23:36, Lisi wrote:
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > I have been trying to get Flashplayer
[snip]>
> > root@Hercules:/home/peter# update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
> > ERROR: wget failed to download
On 02/05/12 23:36, Lisi wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have been trying to get Flashplayer
>
> Thanks,
> Lisi
>
> root@Hercules:/home/peter# update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
> ERROR: wget failed to download
> http://people.debian.org/~bartm/flashplugin-nonfree/f
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 5:36:35 am Lisi wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have been trying to get Flashplayer going on my husband's computer. When
> the advice on this list and the Debian website failed (as below), i just
> deinstalled the lot and downloaded from the Adobe site. Acc
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:36:35PM +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > I have been trying to get Flashplayer going on my husband's computer.
> When
> > the advice on this list and the Debia
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:36:35PM +0100, Lisi wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have been trying to get Flashplayer going on my husband's computer. When
> the advice on this list and the Debian website failed (as below), i just
> deinstalled the lot and downloaded from the Adobe sit
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:36:35 Lisi wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have been trying to get Flashplayer going on my husband's computer.
Sorry, all. As I read my own post on the list, I realised that there was at
least one more thing that I can try for myself. (I gave up yesterday wh
Hi, all!
I have been trying to get Flashplayer going on my husband's computer. When
the advice on this list and the Debian website failed (as below), i just
deinstalled the lot and downloaded from the Adobe site. According to the
site, the latest version available for Linux is 11, but I
On 01/17/2012 09:47 PM, Lisi wrote:
I am running KDE 3.5.10 on Debian Lenny. I have flashplayer working in
Iceweasel, running, according to it, flashplayer 11, installed with
flashplugin-nonfree. Konqueror, for reasons I cannot fathom says that it is
using both 7 and 11. It is giving the
On 18/01/12 07:47, Lisi wrote:
> I am running KDE 3.5.10 on Debian Lenny. I have flashplayer working in
> Iceweasel, running, according to it, flashplayer 11, installed with
> flashplugin-nonfree. Konqueror, for reasons I cannot fathom says that it is
> using both 7 and 11. It i
I am running KDE 3.5.10 on Debian Lenny. I have flashplayer working in
Iceweasel, running, according to it, flashplayer 11, installed with
flashplugin-nonfree. Konqueror, for reasons I cannot fathom says that it is
using both 7 and 11. It is giving the priority to 7, so flash won't r
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:12:57 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . copy it into
>> the plugins directory (/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins in my case) and set
>> the permissions appropriately.
>
> Anyone; where is the appropria
Walter Hurry writes:
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . copy it
> into the plugins directory (/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins in my case)
> and set the permissions appropriately.
Anyone; where is the appropriate plugin directory for konqueror
dpkg -L konqueror|grep plugin
/u
0, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT
>>>>> version --/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
>>>>> HTMLAnchorElement]/
>>>>
>>>> (...)
&g
g when I try to download Ubuntu APT
>>>> version --/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
>>>> HTMLAnchorElement]/
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> Try with the tar.gz file. It is the easiest way to get the plugin
>> from
>
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:49:43 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:21:13 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
>>
>>> Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT
>>> version --/cfusion/downloadcent
Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:21 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
>> Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT
>> version --/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
>> HTMLAnchorElement]/
>
> I am not
Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:21:13 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
>
>> Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT
>> version --/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
>> HTMLAnchorElement]/
>
> (...)
>
>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:21 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT version
> --/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
> HTMLAnchorElement]/
I am not quite sure why you want to install the flash plugin fr
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:21:13 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT
> version --/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
> HTMLAnchorElement]/
(...)
Try with the tar.gz file. It is the easiest way to get t
Konqueror displays the following when I try to download Ubuntu APT version
--/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
HTMLAnchorElement]/
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
/cfusion/downloadcenter/flashplayer/otherversions/[object
HTMLAnchorElement]/
at
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:57:12PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2010-06-16, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Indeed. And if Adobe refuse to maintain the older version there's not
> much anyone else can do about it.
True.
> > After this operation, 124MB of additional disk space will be used.
> > E: Y
libs-libnss3 ia32-libs-libssh2 lib32asound2 lib32gcc1
> lib32ncurses5 lib32stdc++6 lib32z1"
>
> fischer:~# apt-cache show flashplayer-mozilla
> […]
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libfreetype6 (>=
> 2.2), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (&
stdc++6 lib32z1"
fischer:~# apt-cache show flashplayer-mozilla
[…]
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libfreetype6 (>=
2.2), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.8.0), libx11-6,
libxext6, iceweasel | www-browser, nspluginwrapper, ia32-libs-libcurl3,
ia3
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:56:36 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> That looks like 64-bit Debian, right?
Yep, so...?
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On 2010-03-28 13:07, T o n g wrote:
Thanks everyone for the responds.
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:03:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Note, though, which flash player I use. *Not* flashplugin-nonfree.
$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla flashplayer-mozilla:
Installed: 1:10.0.45.2-0.0
Thanks everyone for the responds.
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:03:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Note, though, which flash player I use. *Not* flashplugin-nonfree.
>
> $ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla flashplayer-mozilla:
>Installed: 1:10.0.45.2-0.0
>Candidate:
>
>
> you can get/install flashplugin-nonfree (adobe flash player 10) from debian
> multimedia repo
> http://debian-multimedia.org/
>
Thanks. I received an email with an attachment saying it needed a newer
version and I messed my system up trying to locate a newer version.
With flashplugin-nonf
2009/11/26 Thomas H. George
> Still can't install flashplayer plugin.
>
> I have an AMD 64 Dual Core processor. The system is Squeeze with
> 2.6.30-2-AMD64 kernel.
>
> The 64 bit version of SeaMonkey2.0 is installed:
>
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Li
Still can't install flashplayer plugin.
I have an AMD 64 Dual Core processor. The system is Squeeze with
2.6.30-2-AMD64 kernel.
The 64 bit version of SeaMonkey2.0 is installed:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4)
Gecko/20091027 SeaMonkey/2.0
Ap
On Qui, 04 Jun 2009, lee wrote:
I know that --- but how do I watch the videos then? Why don't the
browsers just convert them to something that can be watched with a
better player?
Why should a browser convert a video? A browser is for surfing web
pages, not for transcoding videos.
--
Eduar
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:58:11PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Ter, 02 Jun 2009, lee wrote:
>> Ok, that's what they are saying. How do you know if it's true?
>
> You check the source.
>
> Oh, this is closed-source software. In this case, if you are not willing
> to believe what the com
On Ter, 02 Jun 2009, lee wrote:
Ok, that's what they are saying. How do you know if it's true?
You check the source.
Oh, this is closed-source software. In this case, if you are not
willing to believe what the company behind it says, you should not use
the software.
--
Eduardo M KALINOW
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 04:20:15PM -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
> > http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
> > >
> > > They get a list of sites you
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 09:49:13PM -0500, Jason Dunsmore wrote:
> lee writes:
>
> > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > I'd gladly do that, but how would I watch the videos then?
>
> Check out the mtube greasemonkey script for Firefox. It allows you to
> play y
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:19:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-06-01 02:36 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >>
> >> How about "dpkg --purge flashplugin-nonfree"? If you do not trust
> >> Adobe, stop using their closed-source softwar
lee writes:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> I'd gladly do that, but how would I watch the videos then?
Check out the mtube greasemonkey script for Firefox. It allows you to
play youtube videos in mplayer via mplayerplug-in.
http://raaf.atspace.org/mtube/
-
On 2009-06-01 02:36 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> How about "dpkg --purge flashplugin-nonfree"? If you do not trust
>> Adobe, stop using their closed-source software.
>
> I'd gladly do that, but how would I watch the videos then?
If you
lee wrote:
[big snip]
>> Use Firefox
>> "better privacy" extension, it can wipe the .macromedia content
>> automatically.
>
> Does that work with iceweasel? Even if it does, I keep the browser
> running until the flashplayer crashes.
>
"better
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-05-31 04:14 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:10:58PM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
> >> If you tweak you flashplayer not to cache content locally, just tweak it
> >> back usin
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:44:15AM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
> lee wrote:
> > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:10:58PM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
> >> If you tweak you flashplayer not to cache content locally, just tweak it
> >> back using the setting panel from A
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> lee:
> > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:41:57PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
> >>
> >> Spying?
> >
> > look at
> >
> http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager0
Rich Griffiths wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:50:11 +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
>
>
>> Use Firefox "better privacy"
>> extension, it can wipe the .macromedia content automatically.
>>
>
>> Tom
>
> Thanks for this tip. I've been doing it manually once in a while.
>
> I should spend more t
On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:50:11 +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
> Use Firefox "better privacy"
> extension, it can wipe the .macromedia content automatically.
>
>
> Tom
Thanks for this tip. I've been doing it manually once in a while.
I should spend more time looking over the available add-ons
lee:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:41:57PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
>>
>> Spying?
>
> look at
> http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
>
> They get a list of sites you have visited --- and who knows what else.
No
lee wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:10:58PM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
>> If you tweak you flashplayer not to cache content locally, just tweak it
>> back using the setting panel from Adobe there :
>>
>> http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashpla
On 2009-05-31 04:14 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:10:58PM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
>> If you tweak you flashplayer not to cache content locally, just tweak it
>> back using the setting panel from Adobe there :
>>
>> http://www.macromedia.c
ou get iceweasel (or another browser)
> > > > > to save what otherwise the flashplayer plays?
> > > >
> > > > Try this:
> > > >
> > > > http://clive.sourceforge.net/
> > >
> > > ITYM: aptitude update && ap
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:44:38PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
> lee wrote:
>
> > > http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
> > >
> > > the image in the upper right part of the page is a setting panel, what
> >
lee wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:10:58PM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote:
> > If you tweak you flashplayer not to cache content locally, just tweak it
> > back using the setting panel from Adobe there :
> >
> > http://www.macromedia.com/support/docume
lee wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 07:26:24PM +, s. keeling wrote:
> > JoeHill :
> > > lee wrote:
> > >
> > > > the subject says it all: How do you get iceweasel (or another browser)
> > > > to save what otherwise the flashplayer
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 07:26:24PM +, s. keeling wrote:
> JoeHill :
> > lee wrote:
> >
> > > the subject says it all: How do you get iceweasel (or another browser)
> > > to save what otherwise the flashplayer plays?
> >
> > Try this:
>
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
