Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:41:13AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:13:51PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
mount -t hfsplus -w /dev/sda3 /mnt/ipod
Same thing...it's still read-only.
any errors? what if you try t
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:41:13AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:13:51PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> >>Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> >>mount -t hfsplus -w /dev/sda3 /mnt/ipod
> >Same thing...it's still read-only.
>
> any errors? what if you try to
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:13:51PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
Ok, this worked (yay!!) but it is read-only. I found a document which said
the partition may need to be cleaned first on a Mac, but I tried this and
it didn't help.
I didn't have to clean a
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:13:51PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> >Ok, this worked (yay!!) but it is read-only. I found a document which said
> >the partition may need to be cleaned first on a Mac, but I tried this and
> >it didn't help.
>
> I didn't have to clean anything
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:06:41PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
what about sda3? This is what works for me (that's without relying on
/etc/fstab):
mount -t hfsplus /dev/sda3 /mnt/ipod
Ok, this worked (yay!!) but it is read-only. I found a document which said
the partition
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:06:41PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> what about sda3? This is what works for me (that's without relying on
> /etc/fstab):
>
> mount -t hfsplus /dev/sda3 /mnt/ipod
Ok, this worked (yay!!) but it is read-only. I found a document which said
the partition may need to be
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:21:42AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
Erik Steffl wrote:
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
...
smeagol:/mnt 21:28:04 $ mount ipod2
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2,
or too many mounted file systems
what about sda3? This is what work
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:21:42AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Erik Steffl wrote:
> >Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> >...
> >
> >>smeagol:/mnt 21:28:04 $ mount ipod2
> >>mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2,
> >> or too many mounted file systems
> >
> >
> > what about sda3
Erik Steffl wrote:
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
...
smeagol:/mnt 21:28:04 $ mount ipod2
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2,
or too many mounted file systems
what about sda3? This is what works for me (that's without relying on
/etc/fstab):
mount -t hfsplus /dev/s
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:25:44 -0400
Emma Jane Hogbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> emma
> PS Is there any way to have my second email account list-friendly
> without having to receive all of the messages twice? I know that on
> some systems it's possible to set an email account to "nomail" so that
>
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
...
smeagol:/mnt 21:28:04 $ mount ipod2
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2,
or too many mounted file systems
what about sda3? This is what works for me (that's without relying on
/etc/fstab):
mount -t hfsplus /dev/sda3 /mnt/ipod
what
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 08:58:43PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> I'm recompiling again with as much as possible as modules instead of
> compiled directly into the kernel. I'm sure that I'm running the right
> kernel; the iPod is brand new. I can only assume that it is fine. It
> definitely turns
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:18:04PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> that's weird, I'd check:
I'm recompiling again with as much as possible as modules instead of
compiled directly into the kernel. I'm sure that I'm running the right
kernel; the iPod is brand new. I can only assume that it is fine. It
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:20:45AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
are you sure you didn't do any other changes? it looks like you don't
have support for PC partitions. I just checked, the partition support
cannot be compiled as a module (I use 2.6.5), here's what I have in tha
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:20:45AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> are you sure you didn't do any other changes? it looks like you don't
> have support for PC partitions. I just checked, the partition support
> cannot be compiled as a module (I use 2.6.5), here's what I have in that
> section:
Ah
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:23:18PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
that's not it, those are both file systems (in .config: #
Miscellaneous filesystems), you need support for mac style partitions:
# Partition Types
Ouch. Bad idea. I get kernel panics when I try to boot with the
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:23:18PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
that's not it, those are both file systems (in .config: #
Miscellaneous filesystems), you need support for mac style partitions:
# Partition Types
Ahh! Recompiling... Does it really matter for the 2.6.x kernels
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:23:18PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > that's not it, those are both file systems (in .config: #
> > Miscellaneous filesystems), you need support for mac style partitions:
> > # Partition Types
Ouch. Bad idea. I get kernel panics when I try to boot with these two ne
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:23:18PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> that's not it, those are both file systems (in .config: #
> Miscellaneous filesystems), you need support for mac style partitions:
> # Partition Types
Ahh! Recompiling... Does it really matter for the 2.6.x kernels if things
are com
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:05:39PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
note that you need both HFS+ filesytem AND mac style partitions
kernel support to be able to work with the iPod.
I have both...
From File Systems -> Miscellaneous filesystems:
x x<*> Apple Macintos
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:05:39PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> note that you need both HFS+ filesytem AND mac style partitions
> kernel support to be able to work with the iPod.
I have both...
>From File Systems -> Miscellaneous filesystems:
x x<*> Apple Macintosh file system sup
Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 04:44:58PM -0500, James Abella wrote:
When sbp2 can log in, use fdisk to get basic partition info of
/dev/sda. If there are only
sda1 and sda2, it's Win mode. If not, the easiest way to convert it
to Win mode is to install iTune on one Windows box.
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:26:13 -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
>
> (and then nothing)
> My laptop appears to think it's an empty iPod. I guess that means it's
> HFS? Unfortunately I do not have a Windows machine with fire
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 04:44:58PM -0500, James Abella wrote:
> When sbp2 can log in, use fdisk to get basic partition info of
> /dev/sda. If there are only
> sda1 and sda2, it's Win mode. If not, the easiest way to convert it
> to Win mode is to install iTune on one Windows box.
Ok, I'm back to
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:24:03 -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if I try creating a fresh directory I get:
> smeagol:/mnt 17:19:49 $ sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda2 /mnt/ipod2
> mount: special device /dev/sda2 does not exist
When sbp2 can log in, use fdisk to get basic partition
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:10:42PM -0500, James Abella wrote:
> log looks good. Did you try this as root:
> mount -t vfat /dev/sda2 /mnt/ipod
lrwxr-xr-x1 emmajane root 26 Jun 20 00:27 ipod ->
/var/autofs/removable/ipod
smeagol:/home/emmajane# mount -t vfat /dev/sda2 /mnt/ipod
moun
log looks good. Did you try this as root:
mount -t vfat /dev/sda2 /mnt/ipod
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:36:28 -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:06:39PM -0500, James Abella wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:54:25 -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin
> > <[EMAIL P
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:06:39PM -0500, James Abella wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:54:25 -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I just won an iPod (yay!) and I'm trying to get it to mount with the
> > 2.6.6 kernel. I've recompiled to get firewire working and the device is
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:54:25 -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just won an iPod (yay!) and I'm trying to get it to mount with the
> 2.6.6 kernel. I've recompiled to get firewire working and the device is
> recognized when it's plugged in; however, I can't get the device to m
Hi everyone,
I just won an iPod (yay!) and I'm trying to get it to mount with the
2.6.6 kernel. I've recompiled to get firewire working and the device is
recognized when it's plugged in; however, I can't get the device to mount.
I followed the instructions according to the 2.6.6 kernel in:
30 matches
Mail list logo
